Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes America/Chicago/User:TonyTheTiger-Photos
Replaced left with center at Chicago Board of Trade Building. Recropped by another on the right.
A good replacement. File:20120929 Chicago Board of Trade Building top recrop.jpg is far superior of an image. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
A good replacement. File:20120929 Chicago Board of Trade Building top recrop.jpg is far superior of an image. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Replaced left with right at One North LaSalle
Good replacement, better angle, but unfortionately the camera's exposure allowed the sun to washout the sunlit top of the building. Better lighting conditions or a HDR image would improve, so room for improvement, but still better than what was previously there. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Good replacement, better angle, but unfortionately the camera's exposure allowed the sun to washout the sunlit top of the building. Better lighting conditions or a HDR image would improve, so room for improvement, but still better than what was previously there. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Replaced left with right at Roanoke Building
Good, needs straightned since it looks wonky, but better than what previously was there. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Good, needs straightned since it looks wonky, but better than what previously was there. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Replaced left with right at Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
I don't agree with this replacement, the image that was there was a good angle good lighting conditions, but a tiny web graphic. The new image is better resolution, not good lighting and I don't think the angle is good. Showing the entire building isn't always necessary, the entrance facad is important and can be a good image. I don't object enough to revert the change, but would consider another photograph if one was availble or could be taken. The new image COULD be ok if lighting was better and care was taken to get directly in the center of the building so it's angled right. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't agree with this replacement, the image that was there was a good angle good lighting conditions, but a tiny web graphic. The new image is better resolution, not good lighting and I don't think the angle is good. Showing the entire building isn't always necessary, the entrance facad is important and can be a good image. I don't object enough to revert the change, but would consider another photograph if one was availble or could be taken. The new image COULD be ok if lighting was better and care was taken to get directly in the center of the building so it's angled right. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- I have restored the original and moved the new image down in the page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:48, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Replaced left with right at Franklin Center (Chicago)
Looks like a hard building to get any good angle on, new is probably better but still dosn't look ideal. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Looks like a hard building to get any good angle on, new is probably better but still dosn't look ideal. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- I have readded old image to the page down below.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:55, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Replaced left with right at Water Tower Place, but move former down in the article.
Don't like either, the first doesn't appear to be best angle, new one is confusing which building is the one that is the focus. Probably an OK replacement, but would seek better angle/picture if possible. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Don't like either, the first doesn't appear to be best angle, new one is confusing which building is the one that is the focus. Probably an OK replacement, but would seek better angle/picture if possible. — raekyt 12:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
