Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee/2013 appointments

Stacking[edit]

Why are functionaries quizzing candidates, and worse still, expressing support for particular candidates? AUSC is meant to audit the CU/OS teams and thereby provide legitimacy to them. If CU/OS admins stack AUSC with friendly "community representatives", it defeats the purpose of AUSC. --Surturz (talk) 04:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, the purpose of the questions is to make sure that the candidates are familiar with both a) the appropriate policies and b) how the tools are actually used on a daily basis. --Rs chen 7754 04:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Top should be changed to indicate comment period is closed instead of having a "Please review the candidates and submit your comments." in bold letters at top. NE Ent 01:16, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]