Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Audit Subcommittee/2013 appointments

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stacking

[edit]

Why are functionaries quizzing candidates, and worse still, expressing support for particular candidates? AUSC is meant to audit the CU/OS teams and thereby provide legitimacy to them. If CU/OS admins stack AUSC with friendly "community representatives", it defeats the purpose of AUSC. --Surturz (talk) 04:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, the purpose of the questions is to make sure that the candidates are familiar with both a) the appropriate policies and b) how the tools are actually used on a daily basis. --Rschen7754 04:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Top should be changed to indicate comment period is closed instead of having a "Please review the candidates and submit your comments." in bold letters at top. NE Ent 01:16, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done King of 09:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]