Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Pakistani cinema task force

	Film portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Pakistani cinema task force.

Pakistan

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Youlin Magazine

This website has come up in a few deletion discussions in the past and I thought it was already discussed but cannot find anything here. Checking on the reliability of Youlin Magazine. Their about page has no mention of editorial guidelines. Their FAQ page says they accept guest posts and that contributors are reviewed by the editorial board but no information about what the "editorial board" is. Gmail address is the main point of contact. Wondering about it being used to verify non controversial information and/or use for notability purposes. CNMall41 (talk) 01:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Chinese-English-language website and I usually find their bylined reviews generally less formulaic and better than most cultural or entertainment sites. Infos about them: https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/931643.shtml https://www.kjis.org/journal/view.html?uid=281&&vmd=Full Maybe it's not enough to establish notability if it all there is but I would not class them as not usable nor plainly unreliable if the reviewer of any given production can be judged expert on the topic they are dealing with. Especially when it comes to Pakistan-China relations I would consider them at least usable; for reviews of cultural items, the usual precautions should be taken (bylined or not? tone? is the content copy-paste of other sources or PR sheets). Thank you. -Mushy Yank. 21:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So if my opinion is of use, I would rather consider them OK for non-controversial information and verification, with additional considerations applying when it comes to establish notability. -Mushy Yank. 22:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]