Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Record Labels/Assessment

I think that we should give importance to to articles. My proposal:

Top priority: Those record labels which are internationally known, and have had a profound impact on the history of recorded sound. Examples: RCA Victor, Columbia, His Masters Voice.

High priority: Those record labels which are generally well known, having a long history of strong sales and musical and/or industry influence. Examples: Warner Brothers, Edison, Parlophone, Arista.

Mid priority: Those record labels having numerous hits or having a profound impact on a particular field of music. Examples: Rounder, Aladdin, Banner (1920s)

Low priority: All other notable labels.

Additional input appreciated! 78.26 (talk) 01:47, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will do! Devin Davis (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

seeing no discussion since, I'm moving this to the project page. Further ideas welcome (and needed!) 78.26 (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Rajmuzik Studio

Hi plz review my Draft Rajmuzik Studio . If changes required plz suggest me . I wil try to give my best. I love music . 1234prifixer (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Aztec Records

Hi, I would like to find people who want to collaborate in the extension of the Draft Aztec Records. There is a great list of references in the talk page, thanks--RafiUbeda (talk) 10:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]