Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Statistics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main page Talk page Members Templates Resources
WikiProject iconStatistics Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Should R not be listed as of top importance?[edit]

I see some statistics software (e.g. Minitab) has an importance of mid-importance, but there's nothing for R, which I don't think reflects the importance R does have. Drkirkby (talk) 15:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of John H. Wolfe[edit]

The article John H. Wolfe has gone through a PROD, but still has issues as it is based on one secondary textbook claim that his work on model-based clustering matters. It was created directly by a novice editor (Stat3472 33 edits). The article model-based clustering supports him as the inventor, but whether this is big enough for notability is unclear. Comments on the talk page please, perhaps better than AfD. Ldm1954 (talk) 09:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multilevel regression with poststratification[edit]

Can we please have some actual mathematical detail in the Multilevel regression with poststratification article as to the various models used, the techniques used to estimate their parameters, and analysis of the power of those methods in increasing accuracy? At the moment, the article's all talk and no math. — The Anome (talk) 11:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]