Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Brazilian Anti-Corruption Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Brazilian Anti-Corruption Act
National Congress
  • Law No. 12,846 of 1 August 2013
CitationPL 6826/2010
Territorial extentWorldwide
Passed byChamber of Deputies
Passed19 June 2013
Passed byFederal Senate
Passed4 July 2013
Signed byPresident Dilma Rousseff
Signed1 August 2013
Commenced28 January 2014
Legislative history
First chamber: Chamber of Deputies
Bill titleLaw Project 6826/2010
Bill citationPL 6826/2010
Introduced byExecutive Power
Introduced18 February 2010
First reading26 February 2010
Second reading27 May 2013
Second chamber: Federal Senate
Bill titleChamber Law Project 39/2013
First reading19 June 2013
Summary
Provides for the administrative and civil liability of legal entities for the practice of acts against the public administration, national or foreign, and makes other provisions.
Keywords
Anti-corruption, administrative law
Status: In force

The Brazilian Anti-Corruption Act (Portuguese: Lei anticorrupção), officially Law No. 12,846 of 1 August 2013 and commonly known as the Clean Company Act (Lei da Empresa Limpa), is a Brazilian law enacted in 2013 targeting corrupt practices among legal entities doing business in Brazil. It defines civil and administrative penalties, as well as the possibility of reduction in penalties for cooperation with law enforcement under a written leniency agreement signed and agreed to between the companies and the government.

The law is directed only at juridical persons which includes corporations and other institutions, but not individuals,[1] who are covered by other laws.

The Act has been invoked numerous times, resulting in leniency agreements returning billions of reals to the Brazilian Treasury, notably the agreement with Odebrecht S.A., which by itself was responsible for twelve billion reals.[2]

History

[edit]

The anti-corruption law is directed at legal entities (pessoas jurídicas) only. This includes corporations and other institutions, but not individuals (pessoas físicas).[1] Under this law, corporations are administratively and civilly liable for acts of corruption. Criminal liability in Brazil due to acts of corruption applies only to individuals, so there is no possibility of criminal liability for a corporation. Corruption and other criminal acts by a company or other business organization can result in criminal sanctions only for its employees, partners or other natural persons who have committed the acts, and the public prosecutor may decide to charge them with criminal acts punishable by prison, but that is a separate juridical procedure targeting a "natural person".[1]

To avoid more serious penalties resulting from corruption investigations, companies may decide to cooperate with the investigation voluntarily, and enter into a leniency agreement [pt] as prescribed by the law. This may reduce their fines by up to two thirds. Other advantages to self-disclosure and signing a leniency agreement include exemption from other provisions of the Clean Company Act which otherwise requires publication of the legal decision imposing the fines, a prohibition from receiving grants from public institutions, and restrictions on taking part in bids on public projects.[3]

The law was amended in 2015 to make certain improvements based on experience up to that point. Provisional Measure 703/2015 made it easier for companies to apply for the benefits of a leniency agreement, and also changed the nature of the benefits. The previous cap for reduction in penalties was 2/3, and this law changed the cap to 100%. Formerly, only the first company to apply for leniency were permitted, and only before a lawsuit had commenced. These provisions were removed. The amendment also established a compliance, audit, and reporting requirement which was added to the law.[4][5]

Leniency agreements

[edit]

Leniency agreements (Acordo de Leniência) are defined under the Brazilian Anti-corruption Act in article 16.[6] They target Brazilian companies and foreign companies with a presence in Brazil who are involved in corruption investigations. Under the law, companies are responsible for corruption and can face heavy penalties, a restriction on participation in future bids, confiscation of their assets, suspension of business activity, or dissolution.[3]

[edit]

Brazilian companies have been involved in corruption investigations in countries outside Brazil, some in collaboration with Brazilian justice, and have paid fines in agreements reached in such procedures. The most notable case was the investigation of Brazilian construction corporation Odebrecht carried out by the United States and Switzerland with the cooperation of the Brazilian government. As a result of the investigation into kickbacks paid to hundreds of politicians, including presidential candidates, as well as to judges on the Supreme Federal Court, Odebrecht agreed to pay a record fine of R$ 6 billion ($1.5 billion) in a leniency agreement.[7] in a case described by attorney general Deltan Dallagnol as the "largest damages agreement in the history of the world".[8][9]

Examples

[edit]

Some leniency agreements signed by July 2018 include:[10]

Comparison with plea bargains

[edit]

Clean Company leniency agreements in Brazil apply exclusively to juridical persons, i.e., corporations or other business entities, but not individuals,[1] and are not the same as plea bargain agreements (colaboração premiada[a]) which apply only to natural persons, i.e., people. Plea bargain agreements may be reached with executives or employees of those corporations to avoid personal fines or prison time.[11]

Individuals accused of involvement in corruption schemes may enter into plea bargains with the Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) on their own. These individual agreements are known commonly as Portuguese: colaboração premiada, lit.'rewarded collaboration',[3] and officially as Portuguese: delação premiada, lit.'rewarded whistleblowing'[b].

Although leniency agreements and plea bargains under Brazilian law are similar in the sense that they both have legally defined reductions in penalties, monetary on the one hand, monetary or prison time on the other, their differences under Portuguese law is clear: the acordo de leniência is civil and administrative, and applies exclusively to juridical persons (business entities); the colaboração premiada (a.k.a. delação premiada) are for people only. They are covered by different laws. Some English sources which translate these terms observe the distinction,[12][13] and others may be more lax, and confuse the two; they may use the term plea bargain (or plea deal) for both.[14]

The first page of the affidavit between the United States Department of Justice and Odebrecht was filed in District Court in New York, and names it as a "plea agreement" (number 16-643), with the parties involved in the agreement named as "United States of America" and "Odebrecht, S.A., defendant", in which it specified a 25% reduction in penalties in exchange for the investigation assistance already provided and other remedies.[15][16]

[edit]

Other important anti-corruption laws passed in Brazil include laws such as Law No. 12,527 of 18 November 2011 (Freedom of Information Act), Law No. 12,813 of 16 May 2013 (Conflict of Interests Act; Conflito de Interesses), Law No. 12,850 of 2 August 2013 (Organized Crime Act; Lei das organizações criminosas), and Law No. 12,683 of 9 July 2012 (amended the Money Laundering Act)[c][1][17]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Colaboração premiada – literally, "rewarded collaboration"; the common name for the legal process known as delação premiada[b] in Brazil; which is a type of plea bargain involving informing or collaborating with investigations in return for specific reductions in sentence prescribed by the law.
  2. ^ a b Delação premiada – literally, "rewarded whistleblowing" (or, "informing). A legal process by which a suspect is offered a specific reduced sentence prescribed by law, in return for turning in accomplices, or aiding in investigations. The common name for it in Brazil is colaboração premiada ("rewarded collaboration"). The concept is similar to a plea bargain, in return for investigative assistance.
  3. ^ For Money Laundering Act, see pt:Compliance#Compliance no Brasil

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e Antonio Carlos Vasconcellos Nóbrega (19 August 2019). "Understanding Leniency Agreements in Brazil". Global Investigations Review. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  2. ^ Bedinelli, Talita (21 December 2016). "Odebrecht e Braskem pagarão a maior multa por corrupção da história" [Odebrecht and Braskem to pay the highest fine for corruption in history]. El País (in Portuguese). Retrieved 23 January 2020.
  3. ^ a b c Hogan Lovells (15 September 2017). "Brazil's new guidelines for leniency agreements in corruption investigations". Lexology. Law Business Research. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  4. ^ Mayer Brown (11 January 2016), "Changes in the Rules Applicable to Leniency Agreements May Change the Mergers and Acquisitions Landscape in Brazil", Mayer Brown, retrieved 23 January 2020
  5. ^ Glassman, Guillermo; Ewerton, Pereira Rodrigues (17 June 2016). "Acordo de leniência na lei anticorrupção. Os efeitos da efêmera MP n° 703/2015" [Leniency agreement in anti-corruption law. The effects of provisional measure no. 703/2015]. Jus.com.br (in Portuguese). Retrieved 23 January 2020.
  6. ^ Lobo & Ibeas (1 August 2013). "V Leniency Agreement". Brazilian Anti-Corruption Act (Federal Law 12,846/2013) (PDF). Lobo & Ibeas Attorneys. p. 11. Retrieved 20 January 2020. (bilingual pt/en)
  7. ^ Paraguassu, Lisandra (December 2016). "Brazil's Odebrecht signs $2 billion leniency deal in graft case: Sources". Reuters.
  8. ^ Brandt, Ricardo; Affonso, Julia; Macedo, Fausto (21 December 2016). "'O maior ressarcimento na história mundial', afirma Deltan nas redes" ['The greatest repayment in world history,' says Deltan in the networks]. Uol. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  9. ^ Da redação (8 November 2016). "Odebrecht negocia maior acordo de leniência do mundo" [Odebrecht negotiates biggest leniency agreement in the world]. Veja (in Portuguese). Editora Abril. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  10. ^ DLA Piper (5 December 2018). "Five years of the Brazilian Clean Companies Act: lessons learned". Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  11. ^ "The Role of Plea Bargains in the Fight Against Corruption: A Presentation by Brazil's Attorney General, Rodrigo Janot". Brazil Institute. Wilson Center. 20 July 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  12. ^ Paraguassu, Lisandra (1 December 2016). "Brazil's Odebrecht signs $2 billion leniency deal in graft case: sources". Reuters. Retrieved 21 January 2020. Engineering firm Odebrecht SA signed a roughly 6.7 billion real ($1.94 billion) leniency deal on Thursday with prosecutors in Brazil's biggest graft case while nearly 80 employees of the company signed plea bargains, sources said.
  13. ^ Reuters Editorial (30 January 2017). "Brazil Supreme Court approves Odebrecht graft plea deal testimony". Reuters. Retrieved 21 January 2020. The president of Brazil's Supreme Court, Carmen Lucia Rocha, approved plea bargain statements from 77 executives of engineering conglomerate Odebrecht [ODBES.UL] under investigation for paying bribes in the country's biggest graft scandal, the court said on Monday. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  14. ^ Machado, Arthur Pinheiro (12 December 2016). "Odebrecht and The Plea Bargain That May Change Brazil". Forbes. Retrieved 21 January 2020. Odebrecht, which conducts business in Brazil, the United States and several African countries, is involved in a plea bargain of absolutely overwhelming – almost nuclear – potential.
  15. ^ U.S. Department of Justice (December 2017). "Odebrecht Plea Agreement". Justice.gov. pp. 1–5. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  16. ^ "Case Information United States of America v. Odebrecht S.A." Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Clearinghouse, Stanford Law School. Stanford University. On December 21, the company entered into a plea agreement with the DOJ. Under the terms of the agreement, Odebrecht plead guilty to the conspiracy charge, agreed to pay a criminal fine of $2.6 billion, and agreed to appoint an independent compliance monitor for a term of three years.
  17. ^ Lei Nº 12.683/2012 http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12683.htm
[edit]