Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:2006 Saroma tornado

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information source

[edit]

http://ams.allenpress.com/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1175%2F1520-0442(1997)010%3C1730:ASSOTA%3E2.0.CO%3B2#figures

A good source to link to for a study of Tornado effects in Japan through 1993.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  06:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that is one of the best references available. The article confirms the Mobara tornado as violent and highly damaging, but not the death toll. The Grazulis source was misread, fatalities were actually injuries. Sanoma was indeed was the deadliest tornado in Japanese history. I've had difficulty finding sources for the Kyushu event. Hopefully someone can find something, it certainly warrants mention as well. Evolauxia 22:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


You find more information about this tornado at

www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/20061108TDY01004.htm

www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/20061109TDY03002.htm

The event occurred at 1:25 p.m. The Meteorological Agency estimated the tornado at F2 intensity.

145.254.52.187 10:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Saroma tornado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Saroma tornado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]