Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:2019 China Championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2019 China Championship has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2019 China Championship is part of the 2019–20 snooker season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 5, 2019Good article nomineeListed
October 13, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 20, 2019.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that at the 2019 China Championship, Judd Trump's fifteen-match and six-month winning streak was broken when he was defeated by Joe Perry?
Current status: Good article
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 05:49, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Lee Vilenski (talk). Self-nominated at 22:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

  • Nice expansion! Article is new enough, long enough, neutral, and well referenced. Hook is interesting and supported by inline reference. No copyvio detected. Awaiting QPQ. -Zanhe (talk) 21:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding the QPQ. I do feel that if Bengal famine of 1943 survives GA review, it should be deemed eligible for DYK. I trust that you will complete the review if that happens. Good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 00:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2019 China Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 19:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will review this article. MWright96 (talk) 19:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Tournament format

[edit]

Prize fund

[edit]

Early rounds (first–fourth round)

[edit]

Later rounds (quarter-final–final)

[edit]

Main stage centuries

[edit]
  • The World Snooker source says there were 58 century breaks rather than 55 as stated in the article. The three missing century breaks should be included and the figure updated to the correct amount

Qualifying stage centuries

[edit]
  • The World Snooker source does not say that Mark Selby complied a break of 137 and a 108 or Judd Trump's 109. An additional source is required or if the information does not exist it will have to be deleted

References

[edit]

There are some issues in the article, some minor and some major. The minor issues concern the way the sentences are written and some instances of editorialising and the lack of an author and publication date that should be clearly stated in several references. One of the main issues concerns multiple statements contained in the article which are not backed up by the sources they are attached to. Will put the review on hold. MWright96 (talk) 12:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]