Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:2020 World Grand Prix (2019–20 season)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2020 World Grand Prix (2019–20 season) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2020 World Grand Prix (2019–20 season) is part of the 2019–20 snooker season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 4, 2020Good article nomineeListed
October 13, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 28, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Mark Williams won a snooker match at the 2020 World Grand Prix despite suffering from gout?
Current status: Good article
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk06:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

5x expansion by Lee Vilenski (talk). Self-nominated at 12:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Officially launched into mainspace (from draft) on 1st February. Nominated within the deadline as noted above.
  • Prose length is fine at well over 7KB.
  • Sourcing is fine: article uses all the usual reliable sources for snooker tournament articles (Worldsnooker.com, Sporting Life, BBC Sport and Eurosport websites). SnookerHQ.com, which could appear unreliable from a WP perspective at first glance, is known to be acceptable for snooker articles.
  • Prose is fine and neutrally written throughout, with any quotations correctly identified; the article follows the usual format for snooker tournaments; and it is comprehensive.
  • No copyvio, close paraphrasing or plagiarism noted.
  • The hook fact is verified and suitably interesting. It could only happen to Mark Williams!!!
  • QPQ review done.
  • Lee Vilenski I'm going to have to be annoyingly pedantic and say the source added doesn't support the sentence that he has missed several ranking events this season: it only refers to the non-ranking Masters. This article from World Snooker would be better, so if you could swap it in I'll go ahead and mark as verified.
Cheers – good to go. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 22:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of rollback

[edit]

I copyedited the Tournament draw section in accordance with MOS:FLAGCRUFT; all players were identified by country in the table above. 86.42.85.52, with a history of edit-warring on snooker articles, rolled back my edits; rollback is intended to revert vandalism, not for a content dispute, and I don't have time to make the same edits twice. Miniapolis 01:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you don't have the time to make the same edits twice, but there's no need to get upset. I edited the article as it wasn't with conformity to previous seasons, I should've put that as the reason. Nevertheless, as I look at the article this morning, the "tournament draw" section is a complete mess, so that'll definitely have to be fixed. Thanks for your report. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.85.52 (talk) 08:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SOFIXIT; I'm now working on another article, which is probably not being watched by edit-warriors. Before you revert edits next time, read the edit summary. Miniapolis 14:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did fix it. I considered myself more of an editor, than an "edit-warrior", but that's okay if you need to debate like that. I did read the edit summary, and I reverted bad edits. Thanks again for all your help, appreciate it.

Making note of debutants

[edit]

I think this is a noteworthy addition to this event, but ol' Vilenski disagrees as he is frequently wont to do. Can I get a big CONSENSUS up in here, or what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:BB6:1AE4:D658:9D4C:73D2:6695:FF2 (talk) 22:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dooks, I've told you thousands of times, please log in to your account. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong again, Vilenski, I am not that user and I have no registered account to log in to. West Bishes, ...me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:BB6:1AE4:D658:DDC8:47BF:95EB:70C6 (talk) 14:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]