Talk:2024 Estlink 2 incident
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2024 Estlink 2 incident article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the Main Page in the "In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from reliable news sources to include recent events. Notice date: 26 December 2024. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Expand topic?
[edit]Should this be expanded to cover more than just the Estlink 2 breakage? At the moment C-Lion1 is confirmed down and there's also three different submarine data cables that are disrupted. It also seems that some sanctions violations might be at play too. Hamuko (talk) 13:18, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- We've got 2024 Baltic Sea submarine cable disruptions. NotAGenious (talk) 14:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Ankkurit eivät olleet paikallaan [The anchors were not in place].
[edit]Citation No. 8, that. Tankers have more than one anchor... Are (main) anchors embossed with the name of the ship, or are they generic? For that matter, are there regulations concerning the loss of such equipment? kencf0618 (talk) 14:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Remove the year disambiguator from the name?
[edit]If there have been no other significant incidents related to Estlink 2, the article's title could drop the year disambiguator "2024" by renaming the article to Estlink 2 incident. 196.197.28.142 (talk) 15:02, 28 December 2024 (UTC)