Talk:Cricket (insect)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cricket (insect) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Cricket (insect) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 29, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Placement at Grylloidea (?)

Some rather disappointing comments above, but see no major objections here to the restoration of content at Gryllidae (done): in order to be taxonomically correct and avoid systemic bias. Personally, I am agnostic as to whether "crickets" should be placed at Gryllidea or Grylloidea – but suggest the latter to be consistent with the modern text quoted on this page … Roy Bateman (talk) 04:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

In the Portuguese wiki, Grilo links to the taxonomic name rather than the common name Cricket (insect). I tried to change this but found that there seem to be links already created to other articles for Cricket (insect). I am not sufficiently familiar with the process to figure out how to fix this. Can someone walk me through the process? Vivafelis (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Crickets" as an expression is a misnomer

The "silent nature" sound effect commonly referred to is not actually crickets, but the sound of frogs singing. Shouldn't we document this misnomer somewhere? And a sound file of actual frog singing might make a good addition. JustinTime55 (talk) 15:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"A cricket" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect A cricket has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 14 § A human until a consensus is reached. Skynxnex (talk) 13:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]