Talk:Disney+ Day

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Disney+ Day article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Television: American Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American television task force.

Reception

If someone could dig up some positive reviews on last year's event, that would be much appreciated, because I searched for them online but was unable to find any. I would think that at least one reliable source has something good to say about Disney+ Day. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: What is purpose of standalone article? Seems like a paragraph or two at best in Disney+ article would be appropriate.

Slywriter (talk) 15:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Slywriter: This event has been widely discussed by reliable sources, thus meeting notability requirements for a standalone article. It is also a recurring event akin to DC FanDome, so the article will likely expand significantly in the future. The Disney+ article is also rather long, so I don't think it's beneficial to add another section there. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:43, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And as Disney+ grows, so does notability of events such as this CreecregofLife (talk) 17:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with InfiniteNexus' and CreecregofLife's assessments on this, especially as it is similar to DC FanDome and will have more content and coverage to discuss as it occurs each year on. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s almost like an upfront, but the most public. The fact that Investor Day presentations are practically public doesn’t detract from this, it’s another place to post progress on content development. Something that might have been close to reveal at SDCC on a D23 off year (specified because D+ Day this year is placed as D23 Day 0 this year) could get its reveal on D+ Day. Okay maybe that’s a little Crystal but not status-damaging; it’s still positioned as an important celebratory content reveal and packed release event. And FanDome, even if it doesn’t survive the formation of Warner Bros Discovery, is still notable despite being only existent for two years CreecregofLife (talk) 05:03, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]