Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Jaeckel Hotel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 22 August 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Consensus is not building for the move after relisting. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 03:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Jaeckel HotelStatesboro City Hall and Drummers' Building – I suggest moving the article to "Statesboro City Hall and Drummers' Building" for reasons that a) this reflects the fact that the article (and the NRHP nomination) cover the Drummers' Building as well as the Jaeckel Hotel building, and b) this reflects the "City Hall" common current name for the Jaeckel Hotel building.

The city hall/former hotel building is labelled "Statesboro City Hall" on its front, as can be seen in this photo.

The lede would be revised to include a bolded "Jaeckel Hotel"; Jaeckel Hotel would remain as a redirect. Common usage of both "City Hall" and "Drummers' Building" is shown in the City of Statesboro's webpage "Boards & Commissions" and "City Council", which are both now used as sources in the article. The "History" source does use "Jaeckel Hotel", I acknowledge, but in that context it is given as a historical name. For where to go to a meeting, citizens are directed to go to the City Hall or to the Drummers' Building, which is technically on a separate property. Note this naming would parallel naming of a separate article Statesboro City Hall and Fire Station that covers a former city hall. doncram 09:55, 22 August 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Omni Flames (talk) 07:57, 31 August 2016 (UTC) --Relisting.Sam Sailor 01:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)>[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
 Relisted - please add new comments below this notice. — Sam Sailor 01:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.