Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Mare Nostrum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

create new page

[edit]

Why was this page deleted? Xyl 54 (talk) 16:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

I've put some compromise sentences here. Can you check if they are OK to bring here? Xyl 54 (talk) 16:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done; are there any changes needed? Or does that cover it? Xyl 54 (talk) 11:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additions proposal

[edit]

(I'm moving these suggestions to here from IMN Talk.Xyl 54 (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]
I also think there's potential for a new section explaining the term's significance relating to the propaganda of Italy, which is covered more generally at Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946)#Culture, propaganda, society, and achievements. Mare Nostrum is pretty empty right now, but I'd think expansion of that article should focus more on the older Roman usage; there's a big difference between the Roman Empire and the Kingdom of Italy. (posted there by JeremyMcCracken (talk) on 20 July 2008
I'd be interested in any connection with Italy's colonial expansion prior to Mussolini. (posted there byXyl 54 (talk) on 25 July 2008.
Xyl 54 (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

there is also this article about italian mare nostrum, Mussolini's Mare Nostrum... probably a copy of an article appeared on simple english wiki --Melaen (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this back again? I've proposed it for deletion, again. Xyl 54 (talk) 01:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

[edit]

Following an AfD on another article, there is a merge discussion here. Comments are invited. Xyl 54 (talk) 17:21, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image a bit off

[edit]

Some wag is using an image of the Roman Empire in Latin that doesn't include the namespace term. Might want to get one that actually says "Mare Nostrum" instead of "Mare Internum." — LlywelynII 07:51, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mare Nostrum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

re: Expand template

[edit]

I've deleted the Expand template that was here: The corresponding page on the Italian WP is problematic, as it contains material copied from the Simple wiki article, which was copied from the Italian Mare Nostrum/Mussolini's Mare Nostrum pages, which were the work of banned editor Bruno d’Ambrosio (as himself or as one of his innumerable sock-puppets). The issue has been raised at the Italian articles talk page; there is an archive of an interminable discussion here. Xyl 54 (talk) 18:33, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mare Nostrum Vs. Lebensraum

[edit]

I have a quibble with the section describing the use of Mare Nostrum during Italy's Fascist period. Comparing the strategy of Mare Nostrum to the ideology of Lebensraum is factually incorrect. To make a better comparison would be to compare Fascist Italy's Spazio Vitale to Fascist Germany's Lebensraum. Mare Nostrum was merely a strategy to retain control of the Med, not for the aquisition of living space (Lebensraum) - one can't exactly permanently live on the sea during the interwar period! Just as Lebensraum was a core part of German Facsist ideology, so was Italian Spazio Vitale. Spazio Vitale was the "product" of Mare Nostrum itself. For Reference see Kallis, A.A., Fascist Ideology: Territory and Expansionism in Italy and Germany, 1922-1945 (London, 2000), pp. 50-51. 90.200.208.124 (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]