A fact from Olca-Paruma appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 January 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that despite fumarolic activity and earthquakes near the Olca-Paruma volcanoes, none of them appear to be hazardous?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
This article was copy edited by Corinne, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 26 May 2017.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoliviaWikipedia:WikiProject BoliviaTemplate:WikiProject BoliviaBolivia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
First dead link remedied (but other SERNAGEOMIN links need checking, I can't do so right now), I can't find the second one. Dropped YBP. The date is apparently not a typo strangely enough, but I notice that the third date apparently is -80,000 years in the past not 80,000 years in the past; asking a second opinion here before fixing that. Footnote and links remedied. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Christie: That link works for me? Anyhow, the thing with the dates is that radiometric dates sometimes have uncertainties larger than the actual value or that they show negative dates. Now that I look at the article again I am not sure that -80,000± 40,000 years ago makes a lot of sense, perhaps I should add an explanatory note but that won't work before tomorrow ... apparently most discussion on this topic is by creationist websites. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You sure? It's hard to infer view angle from there, although I think it's going to be difficult to get a photo that has both Olca-Paruma and Aucanquilcha. I'll ask the photographer. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure. Check the terrain layer is turn on in the layers panel of Google Earth. Press the shift key
and scrolling to tilt the view. By the way, I have cropped a photo by the same author where is shown part of the volcanic complex. Regretfully, the summit of Olca is not shown and the summit of Paruma is shown shrouded in clouds. Jespinos (talk) 16:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
.JPG){kind=link}