Talk:St David's, Cardiff

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cardiff High‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cardiff, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cardiff-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CardiffWikipedia:WikiProject CardiffTemplate:WikiProject CardiffCardiff articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Confirmed Stores SD2

Someone keeps deleting the stores known to be confirmed by other sources (e.g. planning records, company websites etc) but not officially announce by SD2 themselves. This is quite annoying. Please stop doing it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.66.89.109 (talk) 10:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of tenants - unencyclopedic

There's a long list of stores in this article - editors may wish to have a look at WP:ANC, which advises that articles on shopping centres should not include lists of tenants (as per WP:NOTDIR), "unless such tenants are noteworthy in the context of that particular shopping centre". I'll leave it up to editors who've been active on this page to make any revisions they see fit.--Pondle (talk) 21:34, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was casting vote move to St. David's Centre, Cardiff, as there is a shopping center with a similar name in Swansea, and in the world many other things named after St.David. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
St. David's Centre → St. David's, Cardiff

The name of the shopping centre appears to be simply St David's, not St. David's Centre. The official website has also changed from www.stdavids-shopping.co.uk/ to www.stdavidscardiff.com/ to reflect the change. Seth Whales (talk) 21:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe without the comma? - St. David's Cardiff. Welshleprechaun (talk) 21:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"St. David's" by itself sounds like a church, whih it is not. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have WP:RS referring to it as such? 81.111.114.131 (talk) 01:55, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Sorry, where is this casting vote? Welshleprechaun (talk) 13:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IAR. Requested moves are not strict binary, straight up/down votes. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 00:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The idea of the move was that the shopping centre is no longer called St. David's Centre, it is simple St. David's. There is absolutely no need to disambiguate St. David's Centre to St. David's Centre, Cardiff. I have moved this article to St. David's (Cardiff), as this makes sense, it has been moved back again to St. David's Centre, Cardiff, which does not. I agree with Welshleprechaun, where was the casting vote from? And this is now not an uncontroversial move. Seth Whales (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts of non-consensus moves are treated in the same way as uncontroversial moves, and the template at WP:RM generates the edit summary automatically. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was no consensus for this move, nor does it make sense. I suggest Anthony Appleyard moves it back so we can resume talks on an appropriate name. Welshleprechaun (talk) 16:53, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to 81.111.114.131, we have already gone through WP:RM, see above. Again I have to agree with the suggestion by Welshleprechaun, i.e. move it back, so we can resume talks on an appropriate name. Seth Whales (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have moved it to St. David's (Cardiff). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Eastside, Cardiff here?

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was merge

I think that the Eastside, Cardiff article should be merged and redirected to here. The collection of restaurants and cafes doesn't have any notability of it's own, its just a part of the shopping centre. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 01:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per nominator. It is not a different part of the city centre, but a wing of the centre, although under its own branding. Welshleprechaun 14:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Agreed....not notable. Seth Whales (talk) 08:28, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Needs reworking

This page needs a bit of a rework for encyclopaedic tone and peacock phrasing, I think. No time to work on it now, but I've tagged it. Vashti (talk) 00:57, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help required

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I'm having problems with the bottom of the Article. For some reason the "References", "Externals links" etc are being squashed. Can you help. SethWhales^talk 20:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Whales, you didn't properly close the blockquote. I've turned it into a quote template. Primefac (talk) 21:08, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on St. David's (Cardiff). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071026193448/http://www.talkdirect.com/tpl.php?c=4 to http://www.talkdirect.com/tpl.php?c=4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St David's, Cardiff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929000000/http://pirate.cardiffschools.net/index1.htm to http://pirate.cardiffschools.net/index1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]