Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Zhang Zuolin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Source for beginning career as a "bandit"

[edit]

http://books.google.com/books?id=PNJOxyP0SqEC&pg=PA103#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 00:04, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your featured picture is a picture of Zhang Xueliang, not Zhang Zuolin.Walt 45805 (talk) 15:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 02 October 2014

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus that the move from Zhang Zuolin to Chang Tso-lin was warranted; therefore, the page has been returned to Zhang Zuolin. Dekimasuよ! 22:01, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Chang Tso-linZhang Zuolin – The page was moved recently without discussion or consensus. The move contradicts WP:COMMONNAME, which is why the page was moved from "Chang Tsolin" to "Zhang Zuolin" in 2005. – Ferox Seneca (talk) 00:46, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:05, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment there's no discussion on the talk page, nor did the 2005 edit comment say anything about being the common name. Being a historical figure during the Republican Era, one would think he would be frequently appearing using the Wade-Giles version, as the internationalism of the world during this era was greater. -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 04:37, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment "(cur | prev) 09:25, 8 December 2005‎ Yug (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (2,098 bytes) (0)‎ . . (moved Chang Tso-lin to Zhang Zuolin) (undo)" -- your link isn't accessible to me, but the eidt history says this. -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 07:10, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How is Wade-Giles is more accurate? Every WG transliteration can be converted to pinyin and vice versa. There is no difference in accuracy. Pinyin has been an ISO standard since the 1980s, and most modern scholarly works (since the 1990s) use pinyin. -Zanhe (talk) 03:43, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:36, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]