User talk:27century

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by employers for his contributions to Wikipedia.

Welcome!

Hello, 27century, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to RENZ GmbH. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 13:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 21:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Women

I've been noticing your edits today on the various women's halls of fame. Thought you might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Women. — Maile (talk) 20:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Microtrac (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Microtrac and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 00:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 27century, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RadioFan (talk) 00:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frederick Achom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BoomBox

This template is almost entirely redlinks, and therefore pointless, since the purpose of navigational boxes is to navigate between articles. Please therefore create new articles as matter of urgency. If editors cannot see someone making an effort to create the (currently non-existent) articles linked from this navbox, it is likely to be deleted. Regards, NSH002 (talk) 02:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Will be done within a month. Thank you! --27century (talk) 19:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Microtrac has been accepted

Microtrac, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Devopam (talk) 18:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Jeff G.. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added a redirection

Hello, 27century. On your recent article Martine Warmann, I noticed that she is also sometimes known as "Martine George". So I created a redirection from Martine George to "Martine Warmann" - this way, if a reader looks for that name they will be taken straight to your article. Just thought you might like to know... --Gronk Oz (talk) 08:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gronk Oz: thank you, so much)--27century (talk) 08:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oralkhan Bokeev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herdsmen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental rollback

Hi 27century - just a very quick note in case you got the notification and were confused - a slip of the mouse reviewing the history on WP:Articles for deletion/Sean Zarinegar - immediately fixed Olly^{say hi} 21:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Olly150: Hi) yes, i see. thanks. --27century (talk) 22:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of YogaSlackers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on YogaSlackers, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 01:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of YogaSlackers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YogaSlackers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YogaSlackers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 13:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:YogaSlackers (logo).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YogaSlackers (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hi 27century. As we've raised before, it is very apparent that you are working for a number of clients in doing paid editing of Wikipedia. This is allowed, even though it is very strongly discouraged. However, under Wikipedia's Terms of Use you are required to disclose the articles which you are paid to edit and who has hired you to do so. There are a few options as to how, but the easiest might be for you to use Template:Paid, which will help you to place a note on your user page.

Importantly, if you continue to engage in undisclosed paid editing you will be blocked. Disclosure is an important part of the Terms of Use. - Bilby (talk) 15:13, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bilby: — Done. Thank you for your help!

I'm a bit confused. When you said that this was done, were did you post your disclosures? - Bilby (talk) 08:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the top of this page :)--27century (talk) 08:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a disclosure that you engage in paid editing, which is good to see. But what is needed by the Terms of Use are individual disclosure statements for each page you have been paid to edit. - Bilby (talk) 08:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. But, how can I do that?--27century (talk) 08:52, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, one way to do that individual disclosure would be to add a {{Connected contributor (paid)}} template to the talk pages of those articles you've been paid to work on. The link in that previous sentence explains the various parameters that should be filled out. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 18:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiae: — Done! 5 pages. You can check. Also, can i delete this template on the buttom of my talk page("This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by employers for their contributions to Wikipedia.")? And, can I remove this template "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject."? (in some of my articles) Thanks again.--27century (talk) 18:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think this is almost sufficient to meet the Terms of Use. (They say that you must make disclosure in "at least one" of three ways—a statement on the user page, a statement on the talk pages of all articles, or a statement in the edit summaries; I think the talk page disclosures are enough.) However, I believe you must also fill in the client names or the name of the hiring company/employer. /wiae /tlk 20:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's great, but i don't know their real names :)communication was via email. And thanks for your help!--27century (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Devil's Walk (Apparat album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apparat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Studypool logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Studypool logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hootan Ahmadi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1B. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deskera

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deskera, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HyperGaruda (talk) 18:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Spec Property. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lemongirl942: Thank you for you repsonse. I removed this template because it looks like vandalism: the user Aksnahar nominated only my articles for the deletion. My last 6 articles. Without any good reasons. Whereas these articles have already been reviewed. You can check it here.--27century (talk) 15:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 27century. An article being reviewed doesn't mean it is notable. Articles can be nominated for deletion at any time. If the article is truly notable, it will usually be kept. Don't worry about that! I want to clear one things though. Are you being paid to edit the article? (Because I couldn't see a disclosure on your user page --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

a few articles. You can see the relevant template on the top of this page. And on a talk pages of these articles: Martine Warmann, Deskera, V05 (band), Vikram Solar Pvt. Ltd, Preparis Inc. --27century (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lemongirl942: This user (Aksnahar) was marked as sockpuppet 1--27century (talk) 16:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected but not confirmed. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Studypool

Hi. Sorry, this is specifically for Studypool. Have you been paid to edit this? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lemongirl :) No I haven't!--27century (talk) 14:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK no worries. I will however have to walk you though the guidelines on paid editing. Many of the article you have created are extremely promotional. For example the article about V05 (band) would probably be deleted if someone tagged it with a G11. 2 important things - first, for creating any article, I suggest you go through AfC. Second, for editing any article you are paid for, use a request edit template and do not edit it yourself. In addition, you need to declare who is paying you for editing the article which you don't seem to have done. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can have a look at WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY. In addition, if you are using any alternate accounts, it is preferable that you let us know as well. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any alternate accounts. And I explained (just above on this page) that i don't know their real names. Communication was via email. And I don't agree with "Many of the article you have created are extremely promotional". Yes sure, the article about V05 (band) has some promotional text. I'll rewrite this article. It's only one article. But can you explain which exactly my advertising articles are? Because I don't understand. Thanks!--27century (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if that is per policy. The way I understand, both "the entity paying you" and the "actual client" need to be disclosed. I can ask on the conflict of interest notice board for opinion by others though. My own understanding is that both need to be disclosed. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:19, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Deskera-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deskera-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Urban Legend (comics).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Urban Legend (comics).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Studypool for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Studypool is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studypool until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SimilarTech, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Studypool logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Studypool logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Christopher Mark Theodore

Hello, 27century. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Christopher Mark Theodore".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 20:24, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deskera

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deskera, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Steel1943 (talk) 13:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nominations by User:Aksnahar

Greetings. I ran across Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spec Property via a list of various month-old nominations and thereby stumbled on to the other AfD nominations by the same user. While the behavior seems rather odd and they obviously did not follow the full nomination procedures, there doesn't appear to be any vandalism involved, I don't believe that it was appropriate to remove the AfD tags from the other articles out of hand. The discussion pages are still out there, but because they were not transcluded to a daily log page for viewing by the folks who track AfD nominations in general, it's likely that nobody ever saw them.

I decided to operate under the assumption that these nominations were made in good faith--based on this, I've restored the AfD tags to the other three nominated articles, and fixed things so that all four discussion pages (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andriy Khlyvnyuk, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hootan Ahmadi, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preparis Inc in addition to the above) have been made visible to the active editors who evaluate these things. You are of course welcome to add your own comments. If I have any opinions of my own, I'll add them later--my purpose in doing all of the above was in the interest of maintenance, general cleanup and proper following of procedures rather than a judgement on the articles themselves. Feel free to ask me further questions if you have them. Thank you for your time. --Finngall ^talk 18:03, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Amen / Paid editing

As you disclose above, you are paid for editing Wikipedia. This seems readily apparent from the nature of the edits you recently made to the Daniel Amen article. Where have you made the required detailed disclosure of this? Please see WP:PAID for further information. Alexbrn (talk) 18:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 27century. I have spoken to you before. You have to declare your client and who you are being paid by. Otherwise this is a violation of our terms of service and this will likely get you banned from Wikipedia. It would be best if you clarify right now. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

27century you are continuing to edit the Daniel Amen page (with dubious edits) and have not made a declaration. You must identify your "employer, client, and affiliation" as set out in WP:PAID or you are in breach of WMF terms. Alexbrn (talk) 00:41, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COIN

I have raised a query about your editing at WP:COIN. Alexbrn (talk) 01:13, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

thanks a lot!--27century (talk) 01:13, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of V05 (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article V05 (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V05 (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 18:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. SmartSE (talk) 11:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear from your contributions that you are often not disclosing all of your edits that are paid for as is required by the terms of use. Even if you do disclose that you are paid, it is no excuse for adding promotional content. Please disclose all your past and present paid edits and in future use WP:AFC so that your edits can be reviewed before being moved to mainspace. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 11:12, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

okay. I'll fix it! thanks ;)--27century (talk) 10:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:V05 (band).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:V05 (band).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deskera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deskera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deskera (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexbrn (talk) 10:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Spec Property logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spec Property logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Philly Shipyard logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Philly Shipyard logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:53, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Preparis, Inc. logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Preparis, Inc. logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Deskera-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deskera-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Microtrac-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Microtrac-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks

Hi. I've blocked two accounts, but I'm not going to block this one, as I'm hoping you can return to just using this. I understand the difficulties you face, but they need to be overcome within policy through using a single account. - Bilby (talk) 08:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 27century. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bilby (talk) 00:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vikram Solar Pvt. Ltd logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vikram Solar Pvt. Ltd logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:American Housing Income Trust (logo).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American Housing Income Trust (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:M2 (Ukraine).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:M2 (Ukraine).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Judeo-nazarenism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judeo-nazarenism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judeo-nazarenism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Veverve (talk) 17:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alexander Mijares

Hello, 27century. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alexander Mijares, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SimilarTech

The article SimilarTech has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparent promotional page for company with no evidence for notability. WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of passing WP:CORP, WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG; coverage appears promotional

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 20:53, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SimilarTech.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SimilarTech.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alexander Mijares

Hello, 27century. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alexander Mijares".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Spec Property logo.jpg

The file File:Spec Property logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused logo of non-notable company; article about subject was deleted (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spec Property)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:18, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Edge (Malaysia) logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Edge (Malaysia) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]