User talk:Arslanteginghazi

Unconstructive edit ?

In this edit :[1] you mentioned a sentence in the reference "Iran: Tricontinental Nexus for Y-Chromosome Driven Migration" . I have the PDF of that article . Please mention the sentence that you have used in your edit . Thank you , --Alborz Fallah (talk) 09:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism ?

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Origin of the Azeris, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Adding false references to an article is a kind of vandalism , please mention the page and paragraph of the references that you claim to use , if not , I will report to Administrator intervention against vandalism. Thank you --Alborz Fallah (talk) 10:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring behavior

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.--Alborz Fallah (talk) 05:08, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Origin of the Azeris. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:10, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 Hours for Disruptive Editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Origin of the Azeris. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:57, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Talk:Origin of the Azeris, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:50, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd really prefer not block you again, but if you can't behave yourself, I won't have much of a choice. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:50, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're being discussed at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard

Just FYI, you're being discussed at the DRN in the context of Origin of the Azeris Hasteur (talk) 15:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.

These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend". Could all Azeri users prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.158.240 (talk) 12:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Workers of the world, unite!

I am looking for that phrase in the Tatar language, using the arab script. As you understand that language, can you type the text here, the banner in the middle, on the right side?--Antemister (talk) 16:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]