User talk:Bloodoftheancients

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Bloodoftheancients, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Brian werking, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Vianello (Talk) 19:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brian werking

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Brian werking requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Exxolon (talk) 16:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent edits

The reason that the material you have been adding keeps getting removed is that you have not demonstrated the notability of the bands that you're adding to other articles. A core policy of Wikipedia is notability, and with regard to bands and musicians the specific guideline is WP:MUSIC. I had a quick look into Exmortis, and it seems that they never managed more than a few demos and a lone EP... that's not looking promising for passing WP:MUSIC, as demo bands are generally not enecyclopedia-worthy. However, if you could find some reliable sources, i.e. some books or print magazines (not webzines, as anyone with an Internet connection can set up one of those), talking about the legendary status of this band, in at a little bit of detail (not just name-checked in a list of other bands) then it might be worth creating an article for them. However, without an article, just adding them into, say, the death metal article alongside established genre figures is just name-dropping. Worse, you're adding the band members to other lists... most members of even notable bands aren't themselves notable beyond their own article, so have no place on those lists. If I can be of any further help, please let me know, but be aware that further edits similar those you've made recently are likely to be reverted by one or other editor. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 17:43, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exmortis (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Exmortis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Exmortis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 10:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bloodoftheancients! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 10:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Exmortis

Hello, Bloodoftheancients. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Exmortis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 13:49, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]