User talk:Adam

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Coordinators and help needed

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: reason (trust me bro)

Shooting you a reminder

You asked to be given a reminder if you didn't review Tomodachi Life by Saturday. So here I am! :P ▶ GameTriangle (talk 🗨) 23:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Yume Nikki GA nom

I would suggest withdrawing your nomination of Yume Nikki until the page is further improved. GamerTell isn't a reliable source and TIGSource recently got shot down as one at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources#TIGSource. That leaves Kotaku only for reception. Hardcore Gaming 101, Wired and Rock Paper Shotgun could be part of the reception but are only used to provide gameplay info. Suffice it to say it needs further development and I don't think it's ready for GAR at this time. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zxcvbnm Hm, you could be right about that. Thanks for letting me know about those sources; I guess I never did end up improving the reception section as much as I'd liked to. Bluecrystal004 (talk · contribs) 17:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yume Nikki: Dream Diary also needs a separate page. You may be interested in creating it, although if you don't I might at some point. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'll look into splitting it off alongside fixing up the original article. Feel free to if I don't get around to it. Bluecrystal004 (talk · contribs) 01:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For reviewing, and for your tremendous help on getting the article I started Technoblade to GA status, a million thanks! Johnson524 (Talk!) 03:49, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a barnstar

		The Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar
		For your underrecognized work in reviewing and improving many GANs, including and beyond my own!— VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 10:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

Two quick things: 1. Your userpage says that you have no barnstars, which clearly isn't true (see above). 2. I see that you have a Discord-style userbox template. Would you like to join WP:DISCORD? Best, Toadspike (talk) 17:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know about this, I've joined! Bluecrystal004 (talk · contribs) 02:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yume Nikki: Dream Diary has been accepted

Yume Nikki: Dream Diary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DanCherek (talk) 13:39, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Yume Nikki

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yume Nikki you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sparkl -- Sparkl (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:YumeNikkiMangaCover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YumeNikkiMangaCover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Yume Nikki

The article Yume Nikki you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Yume Nikki and Talk:Yume Nikki/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sparkl -- Sparkl (talk) 23:04, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Yume Nikki

The article Yume Nikki you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yume Nikki for comments about the article, and Talk:Yume Nikki/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sparkl -- Sparkl (talk) 19:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

a school with which you have some familiarity

and upon which you've made significant edits is being discussed for deletion. we thought your input would be illuminating. Saintstephen000 (talk)

Thanks for reaching out. I'm actually the one who brought it to AfD, but it was sort of a bold nomination on my part since I'm definitely no expert on applying WP:GNG. I'd probably agree with the Keep !votes. ~Bluecrystal004^{(talk · contribs)} 03:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

heh. Saintstephen000 (talk)

DYK for Yume Nikki

On 12 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yume Nikki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that so little is known about the reclusive developer of Yume Nikki that its publisher Kadokawa Games had to debunk rumors that they had died in the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yume Nikki. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yume Nikki), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For reviewing 3 nominations for a total of 3 points during the June 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby award you this barnstar. Congratulations! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive reminder

The August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive is at the halfway mark, and has seen incredible progress, dropping the backlog from 638 to 359 unreviewed articles -- a 43.7% reduction in only fifteen days! But we still have over two weeks to go, and there are plenty of articles left to review:

We've gone from 14 nominations 270+ days old and 65 nominations 180+ days old to 2 and 0 respectively. No more articles will reach 270+ status during the drive, and only three more will reach 180+ if unreviewed, so this is your last chance to get the higher age bonuses!
We still have plenty of articles in the 90+ range, but the list is shrinking fast.
Some articles need new reviewers, either because they're officially on second opinion or because the original reviews were deleted or invalidated. You can help prevent these articles from waiting longer!
While there are starting to be clear favourites for the Content Review Medal of Merit, the field is still very open. A late entrant can still pull an upset to get the most reviews in the drive!

And remember: if you've done reviews, you should log them at the backlog drive page for points, so they can be tracked towards your awards at the end.

Thanks for signing up for the drive, and I hope to see you reviewing! Vaticidalprophet 02:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have received this message as a participant in the August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive who has logged one or no reviews. This is a one-off massmessage. If you wish to opt out of all massmessages, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: GA backlog drive

Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the GA backlog drive; it runs until the end of March. You are receiving this message because you signed up on the drive page but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Minor Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in the March 2024 GA backlog drive. Your contribution (4 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Bluecrystal004! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 02:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Current Events

Hi there. I was in the middle of amending the information when you removed it entirely without discussion. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 20:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi R9tgokunks, I'm sorry our edits conflicted, but it happens on occasion. I support the event as you've modified it now, and with the source you gave, so thank you for your improvements.

However, understand that I removed a wording which significantly misrepresented the source that was there, and because the source did not mention an announcement of a press conference, so I figured there was no reason for a June 7 entry, only a potential June 8. Cheers! ~Adam^{(talk · contribs)} 21:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editor experience invitation

Hi Adam :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you've clocked me as "experienced" I'll never know, but I appreciate it and answered (kind of late)! ~Adam^{(talk · contribs)} 17:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review

Hi there. I noticed this edit and its summary. Could you please review it and reconsider it in light of WP:OVERLINK and WP:V? I think going by your edit summary you may have been a little hasty. 90.242.60.196 (talk) 20:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly looks like I was hasty. Mostly actually looks fine to me, with the exception of the de-linking of various country names. I don't see why those are a problem, since they aren't duplicate links. Cheers! ~Adam^{(talk · contribs)} 20:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time. OVERLINK recommends against linking countries. 90.242.60.196 (talk) 21:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Yume Nikki: Dream Diary

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yume Nikki: Dream Diary you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 23:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: GA backlog drive

Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the GA backlog drive; it runs until the end of July. You are receiving this message because you signed up on the drive page but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 05:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Yume Nikki: Dream Diary

The article Yume Nikki: Dream Diary you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Yume Nikki: Dream Diary and Talk:Yume Nikki: Dream Diary/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 01:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Yume Nikki: Dream Diary

The article Yume Nikki: Dream Diary you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yume Nikki: Dream Diary for comments about the article, and Talk:Yume Nikki: Dream Diary/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Skyshifter -- Skyshifter (talk) 21:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to access source

Hi Adam, I saw you are a GA mentor so am hoping you could answer my question. I am currently reviewing History of education in Wales before 1701, but cannot access the main source of the article (Jones and Roderick, 2003) anywhere.

I have tried online searching, Wikipedia Library, google books but cannot find a way to access it at all.

Is it allowed to request a copy from the nominator if they have a digital one? Otherwise I see no way I could do this review. It is a wonderful world (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@It is a wonderful world: Your best option would be to choose a few of the citations to spotcheck and ask the nominator to send the pages necessary; if they have a physical copy they can scan them. If somehow they can't, you can ask at WP:RX. Since the book is so heavily referenced in the article, I wouldn't pass the nomination without being able to verify some of its claims.

Of course, you can always purchase the book. Let me know if you have any other questions! ~Adam^{(talk · contribs)} 22:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! It is a wonderful world (talk) 08:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I ended up buying it, as it was pretty cheap :) It is a wonderful world (talk) 08:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]