User talk:Bwark

I am a retired journalism professor who lives in New Brunswick..
Bwark 13:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bwark,

I am a bit lost in the Wikipedia editing business. I believe you wrote the original article on Harold Innis. Subsequently, a part was moved to its own page--The Cod Fisheries: The History of an International Industry. I am not sure whether it was you who wrote: "...the cod fished for centuries off the eastern coasts of North America, especially the Grand Banks of Newfoundland." We, at Distributed Proofreaders Canada, are currently in process of digitizing this book for upload to Faded Page. My concern is with the phrase singling out the Grand Bank Fishery. As I understand it, going through the book, Innis addresses all the east coast fisheries, but spends some fair amount of time on the fishery prosecuted by resident fishermen. That was the inshore fishery, and not the Grand Banks fishery. A minor point, perhaps.

Regards,

Kate Dagg

katenewdagg@gmail.com 72.39.94.235 (talk) 19:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have removed the reference to the Grand Banks. Bwark (talk) 14:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

/Archive 1 To Feb. 1 2009

Ursula Franklin FAC

Thank for the note on my talk page about Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ursula Franklin/archive1; your disappointment is justified. Historically, I've aimed to keep the number of listings at the FAC page manageable by allowing longer time for candidates to gain support when there are few listings, while shortening the time frame to two weeks if the page is becoming overloaded. The page usually runs between 30 and 35 candidates, but it has crept above 50 recently because of lack of reviews, leading me to archive those that have outstanding Opposes. Ursula Franklin had been running almost three weeks without gaining any Support, and with one Oppose. Looking anew, I see that the Oppose should perhaps have been struck (as you quickly addressed those issues), and that there were no outstanding MoS, image, or sourcing concerns. It does appear that the only issue was lack of review and that archiving was not warranted. Would you like for me resubmit the FAC on your behalf? Alternately, please feel free to resubmit it at your convenience. I apologize for your disappointment, although I'm unsure how the overall situation can be remedied without more active reviewers. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your kind note. While I was disappointed that my nomination was archived, I can appreciate your concern about lack of active reviewers. I would be grateful if you would resubmit the article on my behalf for FA review, unless of course, you feel it would put too much strain on the system. If so, I could wait for awhile before submitting it. I do genuinely feel that it meets FA standards. Bwark (talk) 12:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will resubmit it now, over a note from me; once again, my apologies for the premature archival and the slowness affecting all of FAC. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ursula Franklin. Good luck! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ursula Franklin

Hello there. Congratulations on working on Ursula Franklin to FA level!!! Featured articles don't need to go through the nomination process they just pop right on in. So it has been added directly onto the Portal:Canada as selected article Number 43. All articles rotate through randomly. To see the layout see...Portal:Canada/Selected article I can let you know the process of box portals if you wish to do so yourself at some time. Again good job. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 01:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing![reply]

Hi, Just a note to thank you for the work you have put into the excellent article on the main page today -- makes me want to learn more about her ideas! Taam (talk) 00:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Amasa Walker

I have recently finished writing up the article on Francis Amasa Walker and submitting it for GA. Given the quality of your contributions to another political economist, Harold Innis, I would like to solicit your feedback on how to go about improving the article in preparation for submission to WP:FAC. I'll look for your suggestions on Talk:Francis Amasa Walker. Madcoverboy (talk) 18:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muriel Duckworth portrait.jpg

You can note that you requested an OTRS and other concerns on the file talk page, the administrator who reviews the file will see it. Hekerui (talk) 21:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Muriel Duckworth portrait.jpg

File:Muriel Duckworth portrait.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Muriel Duckworth.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Muriel Duckworth.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muriel Duckworth Coast cover.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Muriel Duckworth Coast cover.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Percy Paris MLA.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Percy Paris MLA.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:59, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi, I nominated File:Muriel Duckworth Coast cover.jpg, File:Tommy Douglas 1961.jpg, File:Savage5.jpg, File:Savage1.jpg, File:Joe Howe1.JPG, File:Angus l provincial liberal book.jpg, File:Percy Paris MLA.jpg, File:Otterville Train Station (final).jpg for deletion. Regards Hekerui (talk) 15:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have forwarded formal permission from the copyright holder for use of the Muriel Duckworth image to permissions-en. I have e-mailed evidence for the unrestricted status of the Tommy Douglas photo to permissions-en. My spouse, Laura Landon, took the Percy Paris photo. I will get her to send an e-mail to permissions-en when she comes home from work. This photo has been part of the Percy Paris Wikipedia entry for more than a year-and-a-half with no one questioning its copyright status. Why schedule it for deletion next week without at least asking me to explain its status? Your action shows a definite lack of courtesy. Most of the other photos are orphaned and should be deleted. I have spent hundreds of hours improving Wikipedia entries and have achieved featured article status for three of them: Harold Innis, Angus Lewis Macdonald and Ursula Franklin. I have never been found to be in violation of Wikipedia copyright policies and no copyright-holder has ever complained about my work. I find the ongoing harassment over the copyright for photos extremely discouraging, especially since I have never uploaded a photo without permission from the copyright holder. I also find Wikipedia copyright policies and the upload page needlessly confusing. Are contributors now required to get formal clearance from permissions-en before they upload an image for which they have permission from the copyright holder? Bwark (talk) 17:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are upset that I nominated images for deletion, don't be. This is simply a matter of process, because images not taken by you need permission. Some of them lack them, but with proper permission these pictures are clear to be used for other language Wikipedia projects, too. This is just making sure everything's legal and there's no bad intent. You can comment on the deletion discussions I opened, where I provided a detailed rationale you can dispute, and nothing gets deleted just like that, but there is a timeline per Wikipedia guideline and you can of course respond, as you said you will, and as is outlined on the individual pages. Best wishes Hekerui (talk) 18:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't tell me it's "simply a matter of process." I uploaded the Muriel Duckworth Coast image today and the Tommy Douglas photo yesterday. In both cases, I had already e-mailed permissions-en before you nominated these images for deletion. So what am I supposed to do? Permissions-en can be quite slow to reach a decision and in the meantime, a perfectly legal image is threatened with deletion. In future, please ask me about the status of an image you're nominating for deletion. In every case, we can resolve any apparent legal problems, because as I say, I never upload images without having permission from the copyright holder. Bwark (talk) 18:28, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't go through your history to check whether you are "legit", I looked at the images. And you photographed a billboard saying the photo of the advertisement is free to be used by anyone with only the restrictions of the free license you put on it. I contend that's not correct. I don't inquire into how you are related or how you know the people whose photos you upload, I just think that the issue of uploading pictures by others needs to be resolved well. A bookcover is not normally something released for free, possibly commercial use, because authors don't like their work being freely copied. In case of File:Muriel Duckworth Coast cover.jpg etc. you can use Template:OTRS pending to note a permission is pending. Administrators check every nomination for deletion, there is no automatic deletion, so there's no need to get upset. Hekerui (talk) 18:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I agree the book cover photo should be deleted because it is orphaned. I decided not to use it. The book publisher's agent had granted permission, then he retired. His replacement re-opened the issue, saying I would have to get formal permission from the copyright holder for the photo on the cover. So, I removed the book cover photo from the entry as I was having trouble getting that second permission and I decided the book cover photo wasn't worth all the trouble anyway. Had you notified me, I could have told you that and I would have realized that I should have asked for the book cover photo to be deleted myself. You are right about the Joe Howe photo which I took myself. I realize now that it is derivative. If you had raised the issue with me, I would have agreed to deletion. However, I am not a copyright lawyer. I'm a faithful Wikipedia contributor who tries to observe the rather arcane rules regarding copyright and Wikipedia's rather confusing policies. It's a learning process. In future therefore, please don't nominate my photos for deletion without notifying me first. I appreciate your advice on adding the template OTRS ticket pending. I'll follow that advice in future. Sorry, to seem out of sorts, but I feel you are not respecting the fact that Wikipedia works best when there is collaboration and consultation. Bwark (talk) 19:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy you're not upset anymore. All the best Hekerui (talk) 06:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bwark, I notice you said you sent this info to OTRS some weeks ago, but it seems no OTRS volunteer has so far confirmed receipt at File:Tommy Douglas 1961.jpg. Could you please let me know the OTRS ticket number you got in response to your mail, so I can check up on it with the OTRS people? Thanks, -- Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:19, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fut. Perf. I received this message from Permissions with Ticket#2009091610049421: "I did look at the website in question, but it appears that based on <http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/notices/016-200-e.html#c> there still is a need for written permission to be obtained from the library when they hold the copyright." I then e-mailed the Library and Archives Canada people, but have heard nothing since. Thanks for the reminder. I'll phone them next week to follow up. Bwark (talk) 18:17, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:34, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Isabella Clark Macdonald.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Isabella Clark Macdonald.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great work editing the Randal Marlin article. : )

Great work editing the Randal Marlin article. : ) Prowsej (talk) 07:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Main page appearance

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on July 1, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 1, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John A. Macdonald (1815–91) was the first Prime Minister of Canada. The dominant figure of Canadian Confederation, his political career spanned almost half a century, including almost 19 years as prime minister. Macdonald was born in Scotland; his family emigrated to Kingston, Upper Canada (today in eastern Ontario) when he was a boy. He served in the legislature of the colonial Province of Canada and by 1857 had become premier under its unstable political system. When in 1864 no party proved capable of governing for long, Macdonald agreed to a proposal from his political rival, George Brown, that the parties unite in a Great Coalition to seek federation and political reform. A series of conferences resulted in the British North America Act and the birth of Canada as a nation on 1 July 1867. Macdonald became the first prime minister of the new nation, and served in that capacity for most of the remainder of his life, losing office for only five years in the 1870s over the Pacific Scandal, involving bribery in the financing of the Canadian Pacific Railway. After regaining his position, he saw the railroad through to completion in 1885, a means of transportation and freight conveyance which helped unite Canada as one nation. (more...)

It was re-scheduled per WP:ANI. I'll notify you when it is selected again. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Steven Ross Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Four Horsemen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Photo of American artist Lillian Burke taken at Beinn Bhreagh, the Alexander Graham Bell estate in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Photo of American artist Lillian Burke taken at Beinn Bhreagh, the Alexander Graham Bell estate in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to My Lai Massacre may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

p.139. Cited in Oliver, Kendrick. (2006) ''The My Lai Massacre in American History and Memory'', (Manchester: Manchester University Press, p.112.</ref> [[United States Secretary of the Army|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:13, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CFRB, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Angus l macdonald library resize.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bwark. You have new messages at TCMemoire's talk page.
Message added 06:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

You're welcome! :) – T C Memoire 06:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alistair MacLeod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cape Breton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alistair MacLeod picture

Kudos to you for your fine contributions to the Alistair MacLeod, especially at this sad time. Is it permissible to use the picture provided on this page on other public online tributes? If so, can you advise how best to credit it? Thank you! VickiZ (talk) 21:18, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alistair MacLeod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaelic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alistair MacLeod may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

literary legend Alistair MacLeod|author=Travis Fauteux|publisher=The Lance|accessdate=2014-04-28}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marshall Poe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Princeton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eldon George, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ONS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from the team at Featured article review!

We are preparing to take a closer look at Featured articles promoted in 2004–2010 that may need a review. We started with a script-compiled list of older FAs that have not had a recent formal review. The next step is to prune the list by removing articles that are still actively maintained, up-to-date, and believed to meet current standards. We know that many of you personally maintain articles that you nominated, so we'd appreciate your help in winnowing the list where appropriate.

Please take a look at the sandbox list, check over the FAs listed by your name, and indicate on the sandbox talk page your assessment of their current status. Likewise, if you have taken on the maintenance of any listed FAs that were originally nominated by a departed editor, please indicate their status. BLPs should be given especially careful consideration.

Thanks for your help! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond at Wikipedia talk:Unreviewed featured articles/sandbox#Pinging next round; thanks! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hugh john macdonald.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hugh john macdonald.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Howe1.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joe Howe1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 05:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bwark. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Sackville United Church, Sackville, New Brunswick, 2014.jpg

Hello, Bwark. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Sackville United Church, Sackville, New Brunswick, 2014.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bwark. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bwark. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Education of Everett Richardson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Education of Everett Richardson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 22:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Education of Everett Richardson

The article The Education of Everett Richardson you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Education of Everett Richardson for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 01:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Silver Donald Cameron

On 2 June 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Silver Donald Cameron, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Angus and princess resized.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Angus and princess resized.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Marjorie Simmins

Hello, Bwark,

Thank you for creating Marjorie Simmins.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

try to avoid sources that come directly from the author.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CollectiveSolidarity}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also on that note, I think the page feels a bit promotional in its current state. It reads like one of the "About the Author" sections at the back of a book. Could you make it read a little less promotional if possible? Thanks, CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 22:47, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you didn't look very carefully at my citations. Yes, there is one to the author's website. I'll replace that tomorrow when I get a chance. The page is a work in progress and will include several sections which I couldn't do all at once. I have been contributing to Wikipedia since 2007 and have several featured articles to my credit. Before you come down so hard with your tags you should check the editing record, which in my case, is exemplary. I'm experienced enough not to be bothered too much by your tags, but I fear they would be excessively discouraging to someone who is just a beginner. As I'm sure you know, creating articles from scratch is extremely stressful and difficult. Getting copyright clearance for the photo alone --- which I have done --- is a real hassle. This will be the last time I create a new entry. Bwark (talk) 23:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry. I’m obviously very inept at this. I am going to resign as a patroller because I am unsuited for the job. Once again, I am sorry. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 01:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Harold Innis

I have nominated Harold Innis for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]