User talk:Cahlin29

December 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Shining (film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 00:33, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Lewis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Current Inmates at San Quentin Rehabilitation Center has been accepted

List of Current Inmates at San Quentin Rehabilitation Center, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 18:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing articles

Hello. In case you're not aware, one of the main things to keep in mind when categorizing articles is that our goal is to place them in the most specific categories possible. That means an article should not be in a category and its subcategory. Articles about newspapers don't belong in state-level categories if they're already in city-level ones. Please consider reverting your edits like this one. Thank you! - Eureka Lott 15:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I will revert them. Cahlin29 (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - Eureka Lott 22:12, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RE: NEVENT

You've made several articles that make me worry about your understanding of NEVENT. A crime article usually must pass WP:NEVENT - usually this means having long term, sustained coverage and retrospective analysis, or having a significant impact on something, like law. Citing entirely breaking news sources does not show notability. Medford was actually notable (and I added sources showing that), but your published version did not. Neosho *already had* an article on the perpetrator, and your article was a shorter stub about the same topic that did not evidence its long term notability, so I redirected it. 2013 Radda airstrike doesn't particularly evidence its notability either. Build an article off of later sources instead of ones immediately after the event PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thanks for your feedback, it's cool to meet someone that has an interest in similar topics as I do.

I'll be more mindful, I guess I was focusing on what's covered by lots of Reliable Sources (obviously a crime talked about by just one news outlet doesn't warrant a Wikipedia page) instead of long-term coverage.

Regards Cahlin29 (talk) 00:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of youngest killers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Killing of Michael Mohn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killing of Michael Mohn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Michael Mohn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 07:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]