User talk:Catfanaticmeow

Hi Catfanaticmeow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Bompanigcc (talk) 03:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Catfanaticmeow (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Livre Officiel des Origines Félines (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs secondary sources with in depth coverage of the topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Livre Officiel des Origines Félines and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 06:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Catfanaticmeow! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 06:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppeting concern

@SMcCandlish Hello there, I came here to enquire about you accusing me of Sockpuppeting. The IP editor in question was not me, however, I don't exactly know how I'm supposed to prove this? (If I even need to?) I really wouldn't want to risk loosing my ability to contribute to Wikipedia over something that could possibly be sorted out, as I greatly enjoy it.

When I made the edit on the Supreme Cat Show I was just intending to leave it how it had been left before, as I wasn't quite sure at the time if the 'TBA' part was appropriate or not. I feel I must say I do appreciate you having corrected on that, as I now know better. Catfanaticmeow (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't worry about it. If potential sock concerns look like something to address, they get addressed at WP:SPI with a bunch of evidence diffs and such. A one-off edit that looks kind of fishy isn't cause for that level of drama. If you say you're not the same person as the IP editor, I'm inclined to believe you, and nothing further is likely to come of this. But an IP re-injecting the same unhelpful "TBA" stuff, shortly after it was reverted for good cause already, would be along WP:MEATPUPPET lines, which is part of the same page (WP:Sockpuppetry), so that page needed to be cited anyway. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you a lot for the response and explanation. It's well appreciated. Catfanaticmeow (talk) 22:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hey there @Catfanaticmeow, would you like to be adopted? I'd love to help you out! Please reply with a ping (@Mseingth2133444) if yes. Mseingth2133444 (talk/contribs) 00:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Livre Officiel des Origines Félines

Hello, Catfanaticmeow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Livre Officiel des Origines Félines, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Livre Officiel des Origines Félines

Hello, Catfanaticmeow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Livre Officiel des Origines Félines".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]