User talk:Charliephere

This is Charliephere's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Santiago (Internet Meme) (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Santiago (Internet Meme) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Charliephere! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Santiago (Internet Meme)

Hello, Charliephere. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Santiago (Internet Meme), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GBStudio moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to GBStudio. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GrabUp - Talk 14:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im unsure how i can detail it's features without sounding promotional Charliephere (talk) 15:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Santiago (meme character) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Santiago (meme character). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Angloscript

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Angloscript requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://github.com/Lowena-Cove/AngloScript-Docs/tree/main. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 18:18, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Charliephere. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Angloscript, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Based on your message at Talk:Angloscript where you say that you created Lowena Cove (the organization/team behind the Angloscript language), which seems credible given that the GitHub repo for the AngloScript documentation already contains a link to the just-created Wikipedia article. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 18:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing in the article that is biased or self-promotive, it is purely to document an overview of the language inside the world's encyclopedia, it is not advertising, people arent going to find it unless they are searching for something like it.

Also, you may feel free to modify the page, but it is definitely not worth deletion. Charliephere (talk) 18:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Santiago (meme character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santiago (meme character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santiago (meme character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too much effort put in to warrant deletion Charliephere (talk) 23:19, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Tenconi

Hello, I'm Woodroar. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Nick Tenconi, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Woodroar (talk) 00:10, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Martin (artist)

I've started a discussion about the notability of Greg Martin (artist) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Greg Martin (artist). You're welcome to join the discussion there. Woodroar (talk) 00:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok Charliephere (talk) 00:37, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning - article creations

Hello, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've created 3-4 articles today, all deeply flawed and facing deletion at various venues for various reasons. You need to stop until you better understand Wikipedia's policies and standards. WP:WIKIPEDIAADVENTURE and WP:5P are good starts for learning information, while creating WP:DRAFTs and asking for review at WP:AFC are better ways to start articles as a beginner. But don't keep at it as you've been doing today, or you'll find your account temporarily blocked from editing. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 01:29, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Angloscript

Hi Charliephere, and welcome to Wikipedia. Please note that articles on Wikipedia must be about topics that have attained notability. For example, a programming language must meet the general notability guideline before an article on Wikipedia can be created about it. As a language that has not yet been covered in independent reliable sources, Angloscript does not meet the general notability guideline and a Wikipedia article about Angloscript would not be appropriate at this time.

Additionally, since you are associated with Angloscript, please keep in mind that it is best to avoid writing about topics on Wikipedia for which you have a conflict of interest. If Angloscript becomes notable in the future, it is likely that someone else will eventually write an article about it without your involvement. At that point, please note that content from a source code repository without a Wikipedia-compatible license cannot be copied into Wikipedia in a way that would not be considered fair use. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 03:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Charliephere! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Newslinger talk 03:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PKHeX for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PKHeX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PKHeX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]