User talk:ChocoLite007

This is ChocoLite007's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: R Ramprabhu (November 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Harshil169 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the references used are primary sources and works of him which are not enough to pass GNG. Refer to WP:PRIMARY, WP:GNG and WP:RS. Regards,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:R Ramprabhu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:R Ramprabhu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Harshil ^{want to talk?} 02:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChocoLite007! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Harshil ^{want to talk?} 02:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jayanthi Sivaswamy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jayanthi Sivaswamy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 08:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:R Ramprabhu[edit]

Hello, ChocoLite007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "R Ramprabhu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jayanthi Sivaswamy[edit]

Hello, ChocoLite007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jayanthi Sivaswamy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, ChocoLite007. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Jayanthi Sivaswamy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jeraxmoira,

Thank you for your response. Dr Jayanthi Sivaswamy was a professor at IIIT Hyderabad where I previously studied. I believe this connection should not negate the merits of documenting their significant contributions.

Dr Sivaswamy is a pioneer in the field of medical image processing and analysis in India. Her research includes publications in highly regarded conferences in the field, demonstrably supported by high citation counts. Furthermore, she stands as a leading computer vision researcher in the country, recognized by both industry and academia. Notably, she served two terms as Dean of IIIT Hyderabad, a leadership position rarely held by women in top Indian universities. To ensure objectivity, the proposed article relies solely on verifiable sources. These sources support the facts presented and avoid any personal bias. Currently, no Wikipedia article documents Dr. Sivaswamy's impactful contributions. Therefore, the inclusion of a well-referenced article on Dr. Sivaswamy's achievements would enrich Wikipedia by documenting a notable figure in Indian computer science and medical imaging research.

Thank you for considering this argument on its merits. ChocoLite007 (talk) 08:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not rejected or declined. COI needs to be disclosed on your user page or on the article's talk page. Disclosing your COI lets the reviewer check for undue bias in the article. This issue has nothing to do with Jayanthi Sivaswamy's work. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]