User talk:Ddball

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, Ddball, and welcome to Wikipedia! Wikipedia is one of the world's fastest growing internet sites. We aim to build the biggest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world. To date we have over four million articles in a host of languages. The English language Wikipedia alone has over one million articles! But we still need more! Please feel free to contribute your knowledge and expertise to our site.

If you need help see:

Help contents - the main help page.
Cheatsheet - a listing of the main editing commands.

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using three tildes (~~~), or four (~~~~) if you want date stamp; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. {{{1}}} Again, welcome! Herostratus 06:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC) |}[reply]

Initial response

...to your comments on my Talk page; even this brief acknowledgement is tardy, due to enormous work pressures I face at present. Please be assured that I'll get back to you here with responses to all your points, even if in episodic fashion. I greatly appreciate your clarifications and want to assure you that (and what) I understand, plus reciprocate with what may be helpful information. -- Deborahjay 23:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC) Excellent! I figured you would know somebody that knew somebody ;) DDB 00:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have courage

Please see your new subpage at User talk:Ddball/1. Note the "1". You can create more such subpages for all the articles you wish to create but for some reason others feel they are not ready to be put into the main space. If the contents are questionable in some way - defamatory or copyright issues - then blank the page while you are not editing it so no defamation or copyright content problem is live. The content is then always available for editing from the history. WAS 4.250 15:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and anything already deleted can be recovered by an admin and placed on a subpage in your user space. Just ask nice on WP:AN and reasonable people will help with reasonable requests. WAS 4.250 15:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC) Thank you. I really appreciate this DDB 04:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with James_Royce_Shannon

Hello. Concerning your contribution, ... However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Diletante 22:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have also done the same for Murray Print because of this page. -- Diletante 22:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diletante, I note your recent attempt to provide misleading advice on the reference desk. It is wrong to involve yourself in this way when you have personalised the issues. Plaigarism is not what you seem to think, but then I think you know that. Had I provided a more original (not paraphrased and concatenated) material, your ambit claim to speedy delete would have been on the equally thin grounds of original research. Asking you to involve others when exercising judgement in future would only encourage you to patsy. I wish you would involve yourself with improving the encyclopedia, and not bully.

I have not personalized any issue on wikipedia. I have never knowingly provided misleading advice on the ref desk. My interest is only in improving wikipedia. Plagiarism/copyvio is a very serious issue, I will continue to watch for it and add speedy delete templates to infringing articles. I am sorry if you feel you are being bullied I assure you that my only intention is to improve wikipedia. Thanks. -- Diletante 15:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom murder, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.Shoessss ^talk

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom murder.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]}

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 08:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC).

Too Ra Loo Ra Loo Ral and Care Bears

I was looking at the page for Too Ra Loo Ra Loo Ral, and I noticed that there was a reference to Care Bears in it that you added a while back. There is no other reference to them on that page, nor is there (as far as I can see) any reference to the Irish Lullaby on the Care bear page. Not being overly fzmiliar with those bears, could you please explain what the link is between the two? Thanks. StephenBuxton 22:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the heads up, it was a while ago for me, and I was learning how to work in wiki. The Care Bears did a cover of this song on their 'nighty night' CD of 2005, and possibly elesewhere. I didn't, at the time, know how to show the actual reference, so I sent the reference to Care Bears .. I did so in response to an editor who wished to delete any page I made, sometimes profferring the reason "Not notable" and other times "Original research."[reply]

I really don't wish to have notable pages deleted because I was involved with them. So I'm a little timid, but I'll make some adjustments. DDB 23:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I didn't want to delete the link without checking first. The adjustment looks fine. Thanks! StephenBuxton 09:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mak Sai Ying

I think two of the categories you added at Mak Sai Ying don't exist. Badagnani 23:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might be right, but they should .. maybe I've not written them correctly? DDB 15:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Botany Bay (Song)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Botany Bay (Song), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.traditionalmusic.co.uk/song-midis/Botany_Bay_(3).htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This works well. The song/writing is public domain. The reference is acknowledged per standard operating procedure. DDB (talk) 00:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to mention particular songs from shows in composers' bios, like Botany Bay in Henry Pottinger Stephens, and this is inconsistent with other bios for composers of shows. The list of songs should go in the article for the show. Why on earth is this song notable anyway? -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it to be notable as it is considered an Australian classic. I have no particular affection or fondness for the number, other than it being a folk song I was introduced to through schooling in Sydney. It appears in lists of music collaborations of Australian Folk music, and it was on one such item that I recently was reminded of the song. As to the placement in the bio, the song's fame is such that the author probably should have it noted on their page. However I understand that that might seem strange to someone who is unaware of its local impact. I have no desire to get into a dispute over it, however, but I might note that it would have been courteous were you to have expanded on your reasoning at your initial removal. Had you explained the pro forma to me I would not have assumed that you eliminated the reference solely because of my error in date. However, no harm done.

Thanks for the message. I suggest that you explain all this in the article Botany Bay (Song) so that readers can understand the significance of the song outside of it simply being one of the songs in a forgotten burlesque. Since there are so many google hits about the song, then there must be a lot of interesting published information about it that should be described in its article, like if it had very signicant sales, or is published in numerous collections, or is frequently sung on the radio or other media or events, etc. Wikipedia depends on references to published information. See: WP:RS. Merely saying that this is a song from this show, and then giving the lyrics, does not adequately establish its notability. In the article, you should list the references where you get the information from. See WP:CITE. If you can do all this and establish the fame of this song using references, then I agree that something about how it has become famous could be said in both the show's article and the composer's. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

talk: climate change fixes

Hi Ddball. I've edited your latest contribution to remove one accidental tag, improve readability, and add an references section.[1] I hope you don't mind. If you do, please revert. I'll continue the substantial discussion there. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 16:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Albert Henry Ross

A tag has been placed on Albert Henry Ross requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Anna Lincoln 11:28, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, David. I removed the deletion proposal and have done some work on Albert Henry Ross. If you have access to any other facts about the man, it could do with a bit more detail of his life. I did read http://books.google.com/books?id=fvL6OF-rVwQC&pg=PA86&lpg=PA86&dq=%22Albert+Henry+Ross%22&source=bl&ots=tPti7SaCT-&sig=CZTjSij0CtPWonGNy8gAVwRNU0c&hl=en&ei=Y3psS6fgAseQjAf52uXqBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CBcQ6AEwBjgU#v=onepage&q=%22Albert%20Henry%20Ross%22&f=false but the information is markedly different from every other source (eg his death in 1983, his law degree). Do you have any definitive primary sources we can use to weigh up conflicting claims? Regards -- Hebrides (talk) 23:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All I know is what I read in the book. I felt it well written, looked up the author and Thought wiki could do with the guy. There would be something out there, and my source for his death and birth is not perfect. DDB (talk) 01:38, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll keep searching too… -- Hebrides (talk) 07:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Circus consensus

For a small sample of discussion about this topic, please see User:Viriditas/Circus_consensus. There has never been any consensus /for/ inclusion. Currently, we have a link in the see also section as a compromise. If you wish to challenge this consensus, feel free to keep contributing to the talk page. For more recent consensus on the subject (outside the RfC), please see: Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#The Circus (film) - Time Traveler ??? (part 2) Aside from one editor, there has never been any agreement to add this material to the article. Viriditas (talk) 02:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because this has nothing to do with the topic, I've brought it here for your clarification:

You linked it to a place that didn't exist.

Clearly, User:Viriditas/Circus consensus does exist. I apologize if the "User" was truncated.

you posted on my user page and linked to your user page where there was majority support.

There is no "majority support" for inclusion in any discussion on this topic. There is, however, no consensus for inclusion. Does that make sense to you?

Then you linked it to an obscure wiki editor site where Charley Chaplin was misspelled.

I have no idea what you mean, but if you are referring to the originator of the meme, George Clarke, that is, in fact, how he spelled it.

But the reference is not about the reality of time travel but the issue of perception focused on a shot that didn't make the film, but is included in the extras.

Actually, no. George Clarke viewed the extras and uploaded a YouTube video commenting on the extras. The "extras" on the DVD are about the film's premiere and have nothing to do with George Clarke or his silly time travel promotional campaign. In fact, there isn't a single reliable source about the film and George Clarke. Not one. Viriditas (talk) 02:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your modification of my user page which broke the table and added nothing of substance.[2] In case you haven't noticed, the page is for representing arguments for and against, not merely "yes" and "no" votes, which I haven't recorded at all. Viriditas (talk) 02:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Viriditas

I've initiated a Wikiquette Alert (WQA) regarding Viriditas' editing behavior, and you have been noted in the alert as well. That alert can be found here. I wanted to advise you of its existence, so you could act according to your wishes. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits in regards to the living person Craig Thompson

Talk:Craig_Thomson_affair#User:Ddball.7CDDB

Please comment there thanks - Youreallycan 23:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Liberal Party propaganda follows below. 121.216.230.139 (talk) 15:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have no idea

Just saw your comments about me on Sydney Conservative (via Pete/Skyring's Talk page). ALP Supporter? LOL. As the title suggests, you have no idea. HiLo48 (talk) 21:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Too Ra Loo Ra Loo Ral

The article Too Ra Loo Ra Loo Ral has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:GNG as well as WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 198.23.5.73 (talk) 00:30, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney University women

Hi Ddball. You might be interested in an editathon this Friday: Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/University of Sydney Wikibomb. --99of9 (talk) 00:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Walter O'Brien

As someone who has been active on the talk page, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter O'Brien. --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC) thank you[reply]

Carl Emil Schorske

Hi, you undid my revision on Carl Emil Schorske removing his membership from the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. I removed it as the information is currently unsourced and can't find him one of the three possible lists he could be on: https://www.knaw.nl/nl/leden/leden#b_start=0&c3=S https://www.knaw.nl/nl/leden/buitenlandse-leden#b_start=0&c3=S https://www.knaw.nl/nl/leden/correspondenten#b_start=0&c3=S If you do think he for some reason is member please provide a source. Crispulop (talk) 07:51, 14 July 2015 (UTC) As I stated on the source age I have contacted the academy and will act on their advice .. as should you have before deciding you knew what you were doing with basic research. DDB (talk) 03:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ddball. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ddball. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ddball. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ddball. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacques Jacobs (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacques Jacobs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jacques Jacobs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:04, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ddball! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:04, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jacques Jacobs concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jacques Jacobs, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jacques Jacobs

Hello, Ddball. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jacques Jacobs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]