User talk:Dmehta81

Rakesh Jhaveri

First, thank you for constructive edits on Rakesh Jhaveri articles. The issue is, at wikipedia, we do not use honorific tags to person name as a policy such as WP:NCIN even though they are refereed widely by that name. Even Lord, Goddesh. Mataji, Pujya words are not allowed in names of religious figures or gods such as Lord Mahavir is simply refereed as Mahavir or Goddess Durga as Durga only. "Pujya Gurudevshri Rakeshbhai" add nothing useful information to encyclopedia. The words are just written to honour that person or in respect. We also have policy of neutrality (WP:Neutrality) which also propagate the same idea. So the honorifics are removed. Hope that clarifies your query. If you want to ask anything, please message on my talk page. Regards, --Nizil (talk) 05:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand your concerns. But Pujya Gurudev is not his name but honours received for respect. Still, if you wanted people searching "Pujya Gurudevshri" to land here, you may create a Redirect page which bring them here. So there will be no Issue of people not finding him. -Nizil (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC) Thank you so much![reply]

First, the Citation Needed is not bad thing. It is meant to attract and notify others to add more helpful references. I issue with references is that Wikipedia values quality of sources rather than number of them. See WP:IRS for better understanding of sources. Here article contains news references and some websites. The news articles are helpful but not as much as scholar articles or books. News may have biased or leaning opinions. Age of sources are also important. Self published sources like his website is not considered reliable as they are biased towards the publisher himself. Websites may/may not be critically reviewed by editors so they are not considered reliable enough. Academic sources are best suited. So even if there are many refs, it still needs better sources. and so the tag. Regards,--Nizil (talk) 11:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ravi Shankar (spiritual leader) has such clear thing along with ref of Yoga Journal (ref No.6) which may be considered somewhat reliable.

The often referenced book Gautier, Francois. The Guru of Joy. New York: Hay House, a book is critical evaluation of him and can be considered as scholarly studies of him. They are just few examples. Regards and Happy Editing.--Nizil (talk) 12:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, you should edit more articles and you will find that Wikipedia editing is very educative and lovely process. I may help you whenever you need. :)--Nizil (talk) 12:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had checked. Apart from his website, not all sources refer him by that name. It is not common name in all sources. So I think redirect is enough. Regards,--Nizil (talk) 07:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Nizil, another point just noticed was that on all books that are written by him the name appears as Pujya Gurudevshri Rakeshbhai. He also just received a U.S. Congressional certificate of recognition with the name Pujya Gurudevshri Rakeshbhai. So even from a search perspective it would make sense to include it within that article. If you see author pages or rapper pages, you will see this trend. You can phrase it on the page yourself so we can be in the clear in that sense. Please let me know. Thanks once again!!Dmehta81 (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added that name to article due to your convincing reference.

As he is credited by that name in his books, I have added note regarding it also. Some small edits in infobox also. Regards--Nizil (talk) 04:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Do you have any image of Rakesh Jhaveri giving lectures? If you fully own its copyright (say you clicked that image), you can upload it to Wikimedia commons so it can be used on this article.--Nizil (talk) 04:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The images on Mission is copyrighted so you can not use them to upload as you do not hold their copyright. The images uploaded on Wikipedia are mostly public domain images or image released under free licenses such as CC_BY_SA. These images are royalty free to use, reuse, modify, download etc. So if you have clicked an image, you own its copyright and you can release it under free license. Just go to Wikimedia Commons and find upload on left side penal/Go step by step. If the Mission want to release their own images than they have to go under some legal procedure letter and email exchanges. (For example, current Profile Pic of Rakesh Jhaveri was sent by Mission) Feel free to ask anything. Regards,--Nizil (talk) 14:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image caption

First, we do not consider other articles as guideline for particular issue so what is written on Ravi Shankar (spiritual leader) should not be considered as a rule/guidelines. We do not prefer honorifics in article and image captions too according to guidelines. But I am open to change it to Rakeshbhai delivering discourse in Dharampur which is correct and also middle path between two; Jhaveri and PGR. :) So what do you think? I am not OK with Pujya Gurudevshri because these are clearly honorifics and will push for change at other places too. I have no problem with Discourse in Dharampur too.--Nizil (talk) 04:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:HONORIFICS

Hello Dmehta81, please do not change links and names to include honorific titles. In rare cases where such titles are commonly used (as apparently discussed in the thread above), you should ask for a rename by moving the main article first. Please note that such a request should be based on an analysis of common usages in reliable published English-language sources. You'll find additional related information about this at Wikipedia:Requested moves (and at WP:COMMONNAME with more general advice). Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 11:31, 27 September 2018 (UTC) Point. It’s.[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dmehta81. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dmehta81. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shrimad rajchandra love and care, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coordinator. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:56, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shrimad rajchandra love and care (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:38, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dmehta81! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:38, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shrimad rajchandra love and care (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 17:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shrimad rajchandra love and care (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 18:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Dmehta81. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 18:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shrimad rajchandra love and care (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Urban Versis 32 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 16:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care. Thanks! Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shrimad rajchandra love and care (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 02:37, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shrimad rajchandra love and care (August 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Slywriter was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: All press releases. Creator has ignored COI notice on user talk page and is not communicating.

Rejecting as this should not waste any more time of reviewers.

If you wish to try again, please review WP:COI and WP:PAID, make the necessary declarations, and then forget everything you know and only use reliable secondary sources.

Slywriter (talk) 02:01, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care

Hello, Dmehta81. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shrimad rajchandra love and care

Hello, Dmehta81. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shrimad rajchandra love and care".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]