Jump to content

User talk:DoIHaveToExplainThis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi DoIHaveToExplainThis! I noticed your contributions to Azrou and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 22:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Fez, Morocco. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 12:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DoIHaveToExplainThis (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not entirely sure what to say here. I'm not a sockpuppet. I've sometimes made an edit while not logged in, which might explain any edits from my IP not being connected to this account. I'm not sure why I was blocked, but I'm requesting the block be reviewed on the grounds that I simply wasn't and haven't been a sockpuppeter, and I don't even have any accounts.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CU evidence is  Inconclusive here. It would help to know what other accounts or IP addresses were involved. --Yamla (talk) 00:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None. I've only ever used this account. I have a VPN, so I can't vouch for how that affects things with respect to my IP address, and I've made some edits while not logged in, but never in anyway was I sockpuppeting, and I've not used another account. DoIHaveToExplainThis (talk) 02:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]