User talk:DoshNomad

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi FelixtheNomad! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 12:43, Thursday, January 30, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kontoor Brands (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kontoor Brands and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kontoor Brands, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 22:41, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Electa Allen has been accepted

Mary Electa Allen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 09:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@MurielMary:, thanks for reviewing the article and publishing it. I am definitely new to editing and creating on Wikipedia, still trying to figure things out and learn as much as I can. This was one of my first major articles and there are more to come. Once again, thank you! FelixtheNomad (talk) 10:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamlin Grange (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

User might be notable, but first all claims in article need to be backed with inline ciations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hamlin Grange and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hamlin Grange, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FelixtheNomad! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 03:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kontoor Brands (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources seem to be all WP:ROUTINE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kontoor Brands and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kontoor Brands, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamlin Grange (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You have not added one single reliable source since the last time this was declined. Please see WP:RS and take anything you do not understand about it to the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hamlin Grange and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hamlin Grange, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 22:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jack London

Generally, Wikipedia editors are not allowed to use a commercial site as a source. I was so gratified that you found a source, however, that I'm letting your edit stand. Thanks, and I hope it's not reverted.--Quisqualis (talk) 21:46, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm glad I could help. I thought that since it is about a person who died almost a century ago, a minor citation from a commercial source shouldn't be an issue. I really hope that it isn't. FelixtheNomad (talk) 13:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pearl of Peace EV

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pearl of Peace EV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl of Peace EV. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS ^💬 13:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @GSS:, I've posted a response to the tag by contesting the deletion request. FelixtheNomad (talk) 14:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi FelixtheNomad! You created a thread called Need help with an article's references at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello FelixtheNomad. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:FelixtheNomad. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=FelixtheNomad|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. John from Idegon (talk) 21:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @John from Idegon:, I am only trying to follow the instructions and suggestions in reviews/discussions provided by editors such as yourself. That is the nature of my edits. Beyond this, I use the Community Portal, WikiProjects, and my personal research and ideas for articles and edits - which sometimes result in already existing articles to which I make edits as and when I find them. None of this is a conflict of interest as per WP:COI. Hope this clarifies. FelixtheNomad (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you didn't answer the question. Please state clearly whether you are being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly, unequivocally, and disambiguously - no, I am not receiving any compensation from any person or company in any way. All of my edits are voluntary. FelixtheNomad (talk) 09:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

elcome to Wikipedia DoshNomad, from WikiProject Editor Retention
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talk page of the article. Please take a minute to view a number of quick start pages for an overview of how to work within these guidelines and more information to help you better understand the practices and procedures editors are using. These include: The Newcomers Manual and User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia. Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask me for assistance! Or, better yet, visit The Teahouse where veteran editors are waiting to assist you.
	Policies, guidelines and peer assistance	Help and Tutorials
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.	Tutorial. Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.	How to start a page. If you want to create a new article
	Style Guide. The complete guide to how articles should look.	Help. The complete help guide
	Copyright. Addressing copyright concerns.	Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance	Your user pages and your sandbox. Editing in your own "personal" space
	Adoption program. Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.	Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking in the editing interface toolbox, located just above the editing window (when editing). You won't need to sign your contributions to articles themselves; you only need to when using talk pages. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance.

Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 01:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kontoor Brands has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kontoor Brands. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Robert McClenon:, thank you so much for your message and updating me on this. I didn't know. Can you please, then, review and publish the draft? Much appreciated. FelixtheNomad (talk) 18:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kontoor Brands (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft is a request to spin out an article. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article, unless the draft satisfies a special notability guide. If the draft satisfies a special notability guide, please identify the notability criterion with a reliable source. This does not mean that the draft should be spun out, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun out. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article and does not satisfy a special notability guide, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.) Discuss at Talk:VF Corporation. Since Kontoor Brands is a publicly traded corporation itself, it almost certainly satisfies corporate notability, but, since it was previously redirected to the former parent, it should be discussed at the talk page of the former parent. This draft may be resubmitted after such discussion. Do not resubmit it without discussing it at the (former) parent talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kontoor Brands and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kontoor Brands, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Robert McClenon:, thanks for notifying me. I shall do as you suggest. FelixtheNomad (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael J. Stolarczyk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael J. Stolarczyk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J. Stolarczyk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 01:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m doing my best..

Hello @FelixtheNomad:, I’m doing my best to get the article which was deleted, restored. I’m getting help from another user and I’ve tried talking to the original deleter. Everythings going well, I hope we can get your article back. Regards, Rodrigo Valequez (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I might be able to get the admin to share the deleted article with you, still working on it. Regards, Rodrigo Valequez (talk) 21:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi {{ping|Rodrigo Valequez]], thank you so much for all your help. I read the discussion at the tea house and at the original deleter's talk page. Let's hope for the best. Anything I can do in the meantime? FelixtheNomad (talk) 00:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again @FelixtheNomad:.I don’t need anything done at the moment but thanks for the offer! I’ve contacted the original deleter twice (at his talk page), waiting for a reply. Also, would you like me to make you an edit log like I have in my user page? It’s a log where you keep track of your edits and contributions (I update mine daily). I could make one for you if you would like. If you need help on anything else feel free to ask! Regards, Rodrigo Valequez (talk) 20:47, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Upadate 26/02/2020: The admin still has not replied to me yet. Regards, Rodrigo Valequez (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update 01/03/2020: The admin seems to be taking a Wikibreak, he still won’t reply to me.. Still waiting, Rodrigo Valequez (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Rodrigo Valequez

{{{2}}}

, thanks for the updates and taking care of this. I guess, we'll have to wait until the admin is back. FelixtheNomad (talk) 05:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Bare moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nick Bare, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @FelixtheNomad:, would you like me to find more sources for this article? Regards, Rodrigo Valequez (talk) 21:10, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi FelixtheNomad! You created a thread called General Understanding at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi FelixtheNomad! You created a thread called Need attention here! at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kontoor Brands has been accepted

Kontoor Brands, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great Job! Rodrigo Valequez (talk) 13:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey Felix, Always use the curling brackets {} when trying to ping anyoneElricFullMetal (talk) 11:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi FelixtheNomad! You created a thread called Article for review at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question for you

Hey @FelixtheNomad:, I was going to ask you if you’d like to be adopted? I could possibly adopt you, this account isn’t that old but I could share my experience with you. If you don’t think that’s necessary, I’m completely fine with that. I’ll continue helping you in any way I possibly can. Regards, Rodrigo Valequez (talk) 19:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodrigo Valequez: Haha, I believe you're referring to this adoption. I'd love it if you do. FelixtheNomad (talk) 20:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All right then, I’ll look into it. Regards, Rodrigo Valequez (talk) 03:32, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi FelixtheNomad! You created a thread called Quick question at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PAID article tag -

Hi Felixthe Normad, Good day. I saw you place 4 articles, including Artem Lobov and Andre Fili, with WP:PAID tag, including Artem Lobov and Andre Fili and I have removed them. Please note you need to have reason/evident to place the tag. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 22:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CASSIOPEIA:, I have provided my reason here at the COIN. FelixtheNomad (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, pls provide the "title message" cCON? or provide hist diff. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This is your CON title message "Olive Writing Hub" and this is your hist diff here. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:13, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have added the PAID site at both of the article - see here 2 and here 3. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:16, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it seems like experienced editors are taking care of this issue. I did what I thought was best. Thank you for looking into it. FelixtheNomad (talk) 00:19, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi FelixtheNomad! You created a thread called Recreating deleted pages at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. MER-C 19:03, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Special:Permanentlink/945891343#Boomerang. MER-C 19:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DoshNomad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I have read and I understand the Wikipedia policies on all possible COI's. I do not understand why this block has been placed without any discussion with me or providing me with any objective reason. Can you please provide one? As far as I can see, some user claimed that I am a sockpuppet for creating an article about the band Vandalye. Is it a conflict of interest if I listen to a band's music if I am creating its Wikipedia page? I recently requested to change my username, so that my actual name isn't part of it anymore, because I had recently received a couple of messages on my LinkedIn regarding Wikipedia - I mentioned this clearly in my username change request. I also read the noticeboard entry here and it makes no sense. DoshNomad^(talk) 10:38, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not actually address the reason for your block. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:58, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lauren Wesley Wilson moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lauren Wesley Wilson, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KartikeyaS (talk) 19:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help

Hi @Rodrigo Valequez:, thanks for speaking on my behalf and helping me out. I can't even seem to get a word in edgewise elsewhere. I'd like to explain something here and if you can see what should be done based on that.

This is the entirety of the reason why I was initially blocked - here. Some user named BatdaCat.M had apparently previously created a page for the band Vandalye, but it was deleted for covert advertising. When I created the page for the band, I was blocked under suspicion that I am a sockpuppet of this BatdaCat person. I don't even know who that is.

Usually if you are creating a page that was deleted once before, a notice shows up on the screen with the details. It had happened twice before - once for Pearl of Peace, the page was deleted for lack of notability, but I thought that with enough sources I can create a draft for it - it was deleted and the draft was never restored. It was also part of the discussion in the Equine project. It happened once more after that, so I didn't create a page for the subject. There was no point.

For Vandalye, there was no notice. Only a redirect. So, I found enough sources to create a draft and establish notability, and published it. Until MrClog mentioned it to MER-C, I didn't even know that the page was created and deleted before. There was no COI, nobody asked me or paid me to make this or any other page, so I can't admit to it. I listen to the band, I looked up if they have a page, found a redirect, found sources, wrote a draft, and published it by removing the redirect. That's all there is to it.

Can you please get an admin to see this? Much appreciated. DoshNomad^(talk) 17:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is not "the entirety of the reason" you were blocked – the rationale is explained in the block notice, and there is a link to the actual discussion (not the minimal exchange of comments in the discussion you linked) just below the block notice, as well. I am not an administrator, but I predict that you won't be unblocked unless you actually address the reason you were blocked and convince the admin reviewing your request that you will not continue with the same type of editing behaviour. --bonadea contributions talk 20:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bonadea:, thanks for the response. However, the discussion was posted after I was blocked. In any case, I've mentioned it before that the discussion doesn't make any sense. Let me break it down as I understand it:

I created several pages, some of which were edited by accounts that were eventually deleted for being sockpuppets (I think it means abuse of multiple accounts by the same user, but I don't see how that applies to me). This is the only account I have and use. - If I am wrong about this point, please correct me.
Some of the pages I edited were also edited by accounts that were blocked at some point. Again, I see pages that are edited by dozens and hundred of people, but I fail to see what does that have to do with me.
There is a Refspam for adding a source to an article about Jigsaw puzzles. A) Why would I reference spam an article about jigsaw puzzles? B) I thought that reference was absolutely fine. C) There was a 'citation needed' tag there to begin with. D) If the reference I added wasn't right, shouldn't the proper approach was to mention in the edit reversal why the citation was invalid?
There was no discussion with me prior to the block. I am being asked to 'confess' to something I haven't done, i.e., admit to being a paid editor. I am not one, why or how should I do that?

I submitted a UTRS appeal to the block a couple of days ago and received an email that I should post the request on my talk page. Not a single admin has discussed the issue with me. DoshNomad^(talk) 14:42, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit by a newie at Draft talk:Rakesh Wahi tells a different story. GSS ^💬 16:00, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hamlin Grange concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hamlin Grange, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nick Bare concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nick Bare, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hamlin Grange

Hello, DoshNomad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hamlin Grange".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.