User talk:ESKCheung

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ESKCheung, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nat Gertler (talk) 08:42, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Storming Robots. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 08:43, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot[edit]

Hi ESKCheung! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 13 November[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Storming Robots page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Located the ref error. Hope this has fixed it.

Improvement on minimizing issues on Storming Robots Page?[edit]

I finally got the time to come back to review the possibility of improving this:

issue 1) The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations. (November 2013) issue 2) This article relies largely or entirely upon a single source. (November 2013) issue 3) This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. (November 2013) issue 4) This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. (November 2013)

I think I have put in the changes in order to resolve issue 2 and 4. Please review and evaluate.

About issue 1: Not sure how I could possibility fix that as the education facility is only a 7-8 years old institution.

About issue 3: "other articles" Do you mean wikipedia articles, or others.

Advise?

=================================[edit]

Dec 16th : Another try to minimize the "Issues" that you have listed. I tried to improve the article and put in the proper references from other websites. If still not good enough, please advise.

Proposed deletion of Storming Robots[edit]

The article Storming Robots has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no indication that the subject meets our notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]