User talk:EncyclopediaEagle

User pages[edit]

User pages should not have Infoboxes, as that is article formatting. See WP:UP for what does and does not belong on a User page. David notMD (talk) 19:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, to be picky, claiming a photograph as "Own work" means you took the photograph. If that is you in silhouette, did you use a camera with a timer? David notMD (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My Photo is taken by someone (My friend) from my camera, Should I remove that photo ? EncyclopediaEagle (talk) 01:39, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given that it is a silhouette, can let that go, but keep in mind for future that "Own work" means you or a camera with a timer. David notMD (talk) 02:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello EncyclopediaEagle! Your additions to Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:09, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, EncyclopediaEagle. Thank you for your work on Aloda, Rajasthan. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please find a ref from the official census site of the indian government.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:45, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Niranjan Kumar Arya (IAS) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Niranjan Kumar Arya (IAS). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niranjan Kumar Arya (IAS) (May 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Appointment news and primary sources do not establish notability per WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niranjan Kumar Arya (IAS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EncyclopediaEagle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nirmal Choudhary moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Nirmal Choudhary. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nirmal Choudhary (May 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nirmal Choudhary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Abhaybeniwalreengus per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhaybeniwalreengus. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:37, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EncyclopediaEagle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to appeal the indefinite block placed on my account as a suspected sockpuppet of User:Abhaybeniwalreengus. While I understand that my account has similarities in editing behavior, I assure you that I am not a sockpuppet of the claimed user.

I would like to clarify that I am from Sikar district in Rajasthan and I know Mahadev Singh Khandela as he is the MLA of my constituency. I edited his page because of my personal knowledge about him. Additionally, I am a current student at Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, which is why I edited the page for that institution.Furthermore, I have edited articles such as Dinesh Kumar and Central University of Gujarat because I found a notable persons section on the Wikipedia page of my own district, and I wanted to add information about individuals who are relevant to my community. I have also edited articles about nearby districts such as Ajmer, Churu, and Bikaner.I hope this information provides clarification about my editing behavior and shows that I am a legitimate user of Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.I hope this information provides clarification about my editing behavior and shows that I am a legitimate user of Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. EncyclopediaEagle (talk) 13:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC) EncyclopediaEagle (talk) 13:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.