Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:Gonjabear

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Baker City, Oregon, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Thriftycat TalkContribs 15:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Baker City, Oregon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Splatterxltalk 15:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to delete this information because it does not reflect the historical accuracy of the true history of baker, it is liable and not credible information. The fact that someone who does not belong to the community at large and has no true connection to baker should mind there own business Gonjabear (talk) 15:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Information icon Hi Gonjabear! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Baker City, Oregon several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Baker City, Oregon, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Splatterxltalk 15:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to delete this information because it does not reflect the historical accuracy of the true history of baker, it is liable and not credible information. The fact that someone who does not belong to the community at large and has no true connection to baker should mind there own business Gonjabear (talk) 15:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You've already been asked to stop edit warring once. Please stop. Rusty4321 talk contribs 15:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to delete this information because it does not reflect the historical accuracy of the true history of baker, it is liable and not credible information. The fact that someone who does not belong to the community at large and has no true connection to baker should mind there own business Gonjabear (talk) 15:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please keep in mind that your doings violate Wikipedia's policies on edit warring and you may actually find yourself blocked, like many others. Rusty4321 talk contribs 15:51, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will continue to delete this information because it does not reflect the historical accuracy of the true history of baker, it is liable and not credible information. The fact that someone who does not belong to the community at large and has no true connection to baker should mind there own business Gonjabear (talk) 15:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in mind that Wikipedia does not allow original research and we require most text to be backed up by verifiable, reliable, sources. Rusty4321 talk contribs 16:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You do not live in baker, I am a member of the community, this information is not relevant to the actual history of this town, if the liable information must be placed there I suggest it be put in the government section not the actual history of this town. Your insistence on publishing this liable and biased information is threating the civility in our community and is bigoted and homophobic. Gonjabear (talk) 16:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your homophobia and bigotry is dully noted Gonjabear (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Rusty4321 talk contribs 15:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You do not live in baker, I am a member of the community, this information is not relevant to the actual history of this town, if the liable information must be placed there I suggest it be put in the government section not the actual history of this town. Your insistence on publishing this liable and biased information is threating the civility in our community and is bigoted and homophobic. Gonjabear (talk) 16:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your homophobia and bigotry is dully noted Gonjabear (talk) 16:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your homophobia and bigotry is dully noted Gonjabear (talk) 18:23, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]