User talk:Gossamers

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear Gossamers: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!

--Geneb1955^Talk/_CVU 03:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC01122.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:DSC01122.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Go to Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion#June_20 and find the listing for your image. The reason for deletion says OR which is an abbreviation for Orphan. Wikipedia policy at WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files states that images must be presented in an encyclopedic context, which an orphan image is not. So you need to add the image to a Wikipedia article for it to remain on Wikipedia. An alternative is to upload the image to Wikimedia Commons. If you upload to the Commons, I recommend using a more descriptive name. Hope this helps -Nv8200p talk 23:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection

When you type your search word into the search box, click Go and it takes you to a search reply page. It will say at the top "No page with that title exists.", then a line that says "You can create this article or request it. Click on the link "create this article". It takes you to a page with the Search entry as the article title. In the edit box type #REDIRECT [[article name]] and Save page. That will do it. I set up embden to redirect to Embden, Maine already. Click -> embden and see. Under the article title where it says Redirected from Embden. Click there to take you to the redirecting page and you can see what I did. -Nv8200p talk 01:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Johann Pachelbel

Hello! Please do not add that particular image to the article. We've had a discussion about it at the article's talk page; there is no proof that the image is of Pachelbel (the date says 1748, while he died in 1706; the text goes "Johann Christoph Pachelbel" while he didn't have a middle name, etc.). By all means do re-add it if you can cite a source that lists this particular image as an authentic portrait; otherwise please don't :) Jashiin 08:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use

Please do not add copyrighted images to articles without providing a detailed fair-use rationale for their use and without following the license. This is a copyright violation. --Yamla 03:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out Nortom --Bandurist (talk) 01:25, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please share your opinion

Since you recently edited the Robin van Persie article would you mind commenting on another editing issue at [Talk:Robin van Persie#Nazi salute]]? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Hanging" hyphen

See Hyphen#Usage_in_English or books. Dicklyon (talk) 05:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. When you recently edited Mr. Brainwash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vilanova / Roura

Hi there RAUDYS, AL from Portugal here,

please don't remove the player position of these two (now) managers in their intro. It's more additional info. Their current situation (with the health issues and all) is very well explained in the body of article proper.

Happy editing - --AL (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Santi Cazorla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castellón (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Richardson (television presenter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rodrigo y Gabriela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aluko's nationality

Hello, and thanks for asking. The history of the lead of this article went as follows: Up until he played for Nigeria, the opening sentence did read "is an English footballer". Once he played for them, it was changed to the rather messy form "is an English-born Nigerian international footballer", and then, to fit in with the relevant bit of the Manual of Style, that says "previous nationalities or the country of birth should not be mentioned in the opening sentence unless they are relevant to the subject's notability", changed again some five years ago to the current form, which has been stable ever since, with no nationality in the opening sentence but with his birthplace and change of international representation simply explained lower down the lead section.

The point is, if a subject is born in Fooland, and their only nationality and citizenship is of Fooland, and they've only ever represented Fooland at football, then there's no problem with declaring them in the opening sentence to be a Foolandish footballer. However, Mr Aluko was born in England and represented England at youth level, but later chose to represent Nigeria at full international level, so it'd be misleading to the reader to declare him unequivocally English. He's British by birth-nationality, "English" by youth-representation and "Nigerian" by senior-representation. It'd be just as accurate and just as misleading to declare him Nigerian, as people have tried to in the past and which has also been reverted, e.g. here.

Hope this clarifies the matter. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Louis van Gaal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Manchester United: Louis van Gaal confirmed as new manager"/> Louis Van Gaal has named [Ryan Giggs]] as his assistant manager, [[Marcel Bout]] as assistant coach, specialising in oppositional

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lionel Messi

The guy's full name is Lionel Andrés Messi Cuccittini, according to the official 2014 FIFA World Cup players' list published by FIFA. I don't get why you keep reverting this. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 21:24, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It makes sense anyway since his father's name is Jorge Messi and his mother's name is Celia Cuccittini. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 21:27, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kolarov picture

Please look at this picture, as you can see it is a copyrighted UEFA-sanctioned picture, from 2011 (so in fact it is older than the picture you reverted). The tags on Wikimedia Commons were false and it will very likely get deleted. That is why the other picture from 2012 was returned to the article. Zastavafan76 (talk) 21:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heights

Why are you removing referenced and valid content? What is the relevant Wikipedia policy which states that heights must be sourced to an 'official' reference? Giant Snowman 18:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Diff 1, Diff 2, Diff 3, Diff 4 - all showing you removing referenced and valid content. Giant Snowman 09:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protecting pages

Hi, I hope you dont mind but I saw in your edit summary at Aaron Ramsey that you did not know how to protect pages so I thought I might help. Only administrators can protect pages but anyone can ask for a page to get protected. To ask for a page protection, you go to WP:RPP (Request for Page Protection) and follow instructions on that page. If you have any more questions or need any help you just let me know and I will do what I can to try and help. QED237 (talk) 11:17, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

thanx for the great work on wiki. I'm just now looking around to see how everything works. if u have any suggestions on where I should really start let me know and thanx again Areddesign (talk) 13:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 FA Community Shield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

missing edit summaries

Hi, gossamers if you could be so kind, can you toss in a small edit summary when you edit? I have nothing against your edits on cerebral palsy which I contribute to too, but an edit summary would facilitate working through my watch list a lot. It's a simple form of paying respect to others!--Wuerzele (talk) 15:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ethiopia

Reverted you as you may know, what in the world was that meant to be? Doug Weller (talk) 20:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, total mistake. I was trying to fix the formatting mistake (an unnecessary space between the 2015 population estimate and the reference) by doing control+f to find the population section (hence the "pop"), and must have accidentally typed that without noticing it when I did the control+f. I will now fix the original formatting error that you also can see in your reversion. Thanks!

Gossamers (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, sorry I missed the formatting mistake! That sort of thing is all too easy to do. Doug Weller (talk) 05:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph-Armand Bombardier

On the article Joseph-Armand Bombardier, you made this edit where you removed "known_for = Founder of Bombardier" from the infobox. You did not leave an edit summary. Why did you make this edit? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominative determinism

Thank you for getting involved in the nominative determinism article. You mentioned with your edit of the lead where you removed the Splatt & Weedon example "Humourous but not necessary or appropriate." What do you think if we replace the Trench example in the next sentence with Splatt & Weedon? I think the Splatt & Weedon example is so often referenced, in the various news articles, that it probably should be in the lead. Being a double case it's also stronger than Trench. So it could be something like this:

Nominative determinism is the hypothesis that people tend to gravitate towards areas of work that fit their name. The term nominative determinism was first used in the popular science magazine New Scientist in 1994, after a series of observations of recent studies done by researchers with remarkably fitting surnames, including a book on polar explorations by Daniel Snowman and a urology article by Splatt and Weedon, raised suspicion of the existence of a psychological effect.

What do you think? Edwininlondon (talk) 07:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gossamers. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Professional footballer

Once again, can someone please add the word professional in front of footballer in the main page of Cristiano Ronaldo. It now reads: Cristiano Ronaldo dos Santos Aveiro, ComM, GOIH (Portuguese pronunciation: [kɾiʃ'tjɐnu ʁuˈnaɫdu], born 5 February 1985) is a Portuguese footballer for Spanish club Real Madrid and the Portugal national team. It should read: Cristiano Ronaldo dos Santos Aveiro, ComM, GOIH (Portuguese pronunciation: [kɾiʃ'tjɐnu ʁuˈnaɫdu], born 5 February 1985) is a Portuguese professional footballer for Spanish club Real Madrid and the Portugal national team.

It was there before and it was removed, which is not consistent with other players wiki pages. Here are some to name a few:

Lionel Messi: Lionel Andrés "Leo" Messi[note 1] (Spanish pronunciation: [ljoˈnel anˈdɾes ˈmesi] ( listen); born 24 June 1987) is an Argentine professional footballer who plays as a forward for Spanish club FC Barcelona and the Argentina national team.

Sergio Ramos: Sergio Ramos García (Spanish pronunciation: [ˈserxjo ˈramos ɣarˈθi.a]; born 30 March 1986) is a Spanish professional footballer who plays for and captains both, Real Madrid and the Spain national football team.

Neymar da Silva Santos Júnior (Portuguese pronunciation: [nejˈmaʁ dɐ ˈsiwvɐ ˈsɐ̃tus ˈʒũɲoʁ]; born 5 February 1992), commonly known as Neymar or Neymar Jr., is a Brazilian professional footballer who plays as a forward for Spanish club FC Barcelona and the Brazil national team.

All these contain the word "professional" in front of footballer. Please someone add that word. I wish I could do it but I am new to Wikipedia and don't have the authority to do so.

Vilypetkov (talk) 23:50, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gossamers. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI

That's your third revert on Taylor Swift in under an hour. If you make a fourth in the next 24 hours, you risk being blocked for violating the three-revert rule. I won't revert again, but somebody else might and if you make a fourth revert I will ask for an uninvolved admin to intervene. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

👍

Penny for your thoughts? 14:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gossamers. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Defining and non-defining relative clauses

Hi. A non-defining relative clause is used to add information that is not essential to know who or what is being spoken about. Let's say I have two brothers. 'My brother who is an EFL teacher is 35.' 'My brother who is a fireman is 32'. You need the information 'who is a fireman' to know which brother I am referring to. Now let's assume I have one brother. 'My brother, who is an EFL teacher, is 35.' Seeing as I only have one, the information 'My brother', is sufficient to understand who is being referred to. The information as to his career is additional, non-essential information. So a non-defining relative clause, which is separated by commas, is used. Michael Bisping is an actor and mixed martial artist. That is enough to define who we are speaking about. The fact that he competed in the UFC is not essential information. It would be if there were another Michael Bisping who were an actor and martial artist who didn't compete in the UFC middleweight division. In order for you to be right you would need to point out that another man with the same name and jobs existed who did NOT compete in the UFC middleweight division, which would make the fact that this Michael Bisping did essential. I teach this stuff every day. It is not a grammatical error. Please don't revert again without discussion. NEDOCHAN (talk) 12:06, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case you'd prefer an official explanation: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/relative-clauses-defining-and-non-defining NEDOCHAN (talk) 12:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prodigy Education moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Prodigy Education, has too many promotional elements as written to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's guidelines and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 00:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prodigy Education (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prodigy Education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Prodigy Education, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 20:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gossamers! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 20:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ochs error

Thanks for catching those 99999s - I don't know how I managed to do that. And I agree the sentence about his friends is redundant. Tvoz/talk 02:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Prodigy Education

Hello, Gossamers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prodigy Education, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Prodigy Education

Hello, Gossamers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Prodigy Education".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lead sentences of a BLP

Please see Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Sam_Bankman-Fried_and_"fraudster". This is relevant to Harvey Weinstein's page. It is certainly a tone issue to try to list someone based on their criminal conviction before noting what they're actually notable for. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]