User talk:Het666

Edit summary

Hi, thanks for your help in improving the constituency pages. Please do not forget to add a short WP:EDITSUMMARY of what changes you have done. Venkat TL (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Het666! Your additions to Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 16:09, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Arvind Kejriwal into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 13:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Netball at the 2022 National Games of India

Hi. Currently the article (Netball at the 2022 National Games of India) says that games were played between October 26 and 30, but it's currently the 1st; how is this possible? Ovinus (talk) 03:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's from Oficial site of national which shows it was concluded on 30th September, that's was right too. Check Oficial website. Het666 (talk) 04:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? The article says Netball events were held from 26 October 2022 to 30 October 2022. Is that a typo? Ovinus (talk) 04:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh it's my mistake Het666 (talk) 07:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, thanks for fixing it. Also in the future, please use more edit summaries; it really helps others understand what you're doing, even if you think it's relatively simple. For example, "fixing dates" might have been a good edit summary for Special:Diff/1113590806. Cheers. Ovinus (talk) 18:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adhering to copuright policy

You have been previously warned about copying text, and yet have done it again. Adhering to copyright policy is not optional. Whpq (talk) 13:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2023 National Games of India moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023 National Games of India, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 19:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why Gautam Adani is shown as Narendra Modi's ally? On 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election Het666 (talk) 09:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Venkat TL (talk) 09:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have put that on talk page for consensus so don't add wrong information there Het666 (talk) 09:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus process is not complete. You cannot add controversial content, before a consensus is reached. Venkat TL (talk) 10:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Surat district, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed places are not in Surat District at all. Unai and Dandi are in Navsari District and Tithal being in Valsad District while Vansda National Park is situated in Navsari District thus it is not rated Surat District there for deleted Het666 (talk) 17:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Surat district does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Venkat TL (talk) 18:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Het, instead of explaining this in the talk page, you should have used the edit summary option to say that. Venkat TL (talk) 18:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your support Het666 (talk) 18:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia as a source

Venkat TL(talk) hey please help, can we use other Wikipedia s page as source?

Het666, no, You cannot use just a wikipedia page link as a reference. However you are free to use the text and the reference from that wikipedia page and copy it while clearly mentioning the source in edit summary. You should use this exact phrase "Copied content from 14th Gujarat Assembly; see that page's history for attribution" . So that way you can recycle content from Wikipedia. But if the page you want to use has no source for the content you want to copy, then you should not copy. Venkat TL (talk) 18:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok again thank you Het666 (talk) 04:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Venkat TL (talk) 09:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have only put sourced data and also has given description about my edit does it against Wikipedia policies Het666 (talk) 09:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Het666 reported by User:Venkat TL (Result: ). Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 10:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BRD

Hi, Are you familiar with the WP:BRD process. If you add something and it gets removed by another user, you should not add it until a consensus is achieved according to the WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION methods.

Right now both articles are protected and have been reverted to a version that is not mine and is a version before the recent edit warring disputes. I need your support and cooperation to prevent any further edit warring on the election pages. Or else the admins will protect the page and it cannot be updated anymore. If WP:BRD is violated and a second revert is made, those should be reported. I have said more on Talk:2022_Himachal_Pradesh_Legislative_Assembly_election#Status_Quo_version_of_5_October_restored and Talk:2022_Gujarat_Legislative_Assembly_election#Status_Quo_version_of_11_October_restored. Venkat TL (talk) 11:41, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indent

Please read Help:Talk pages#Indentation and correctly WP:INDENT your comments on Talk pages. You can also use the DiscussionTools to make it easier. Venkat TL (talk) 14:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please indent correctly. Venkat TL (talk) 11:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please indent your post on talk page. Venkat TL (talk) 14:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey i mnot having pc now there for it is not quite possible for me to code nor i have earlier done this Help if u can Het666 (talk) 14:30, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Het it is not complicated. All you have to do is to add as many Colon ":", as the number of comments above yours. for example in this comment I am adding 4 colons since there are 4 coments above this line. --Venkat TL (talk) 16:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Het666 (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for helps Het666 (talk) 16:50, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Colon need to be put before the comment, not above the comment. See example given on Help:Talk_pages#Indentation Venkat TL (talk) 17:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please type colons before typing your comment. Venkat TL (talk) 08:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you refuse to put colons before your comments, it is not possible to understand to whom you are replying to. So I have decided I will not reply to any comment from you that has no indentation. Venkat TL (talk) 09:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kinnaur district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalpa. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great Nicobar Development Plan

An article you recently created, Great Nicobar Development Plan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Contingent Share

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Contingent Share requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/contingent-shares.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not from site mentioned but it's from other sources and I have written a concept from Ind AS 33 an accounting standard this site is just an example of it , Het666 (talk) 18:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help me for this *Contest this speedy deletion* Het666 (talk) 18:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election, you may be blocked from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:25, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again it's on your side above rule applies to you in fact If you have any doubt regarding that information talk on page otherwise don't Het666 (talk) 08:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Het666 That's not how wikipedia works. You have to justify your addition to the article to get consensus. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again I m saying it's on your side your are making Wikipedia:Edit warring page is not edited according to you see what has happened to Venkat TL Het666 (talk) 08:54, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely because of further copyright violations (most recently inserting this image, uploaded by yourself, into India) despite a number of serious warnings, some of which you have removed from this page. I'm sorry it takes a block to show you that Wikipedia takes copyright seriously. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 18:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Het666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey As i already said that my intension was not to break copyrights and earlier when i added images such notice is not given and also I was unaware of copyright policy of Wikipedia i was doing that same with Wikipedia:Assume good faith I thought Copyright is not attracted to Wikipedia sites and after knowing copyright issue and also i didn't know how delete it I am assuring you that this will never happen again Please i request you to unblock me User:Bishonen Het666 (talk) 02:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You got four warnings, so you have no reasonable excuse not to know about our copyright policy. In addition, your unblock request fails to demonstrate the necessary proficiency in written English needed to contribute constructively. MER-C 11:08, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also I have uploaded two images recently to check whether they in Line with policies of Wikipedia Het666 (talk) 02:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also requesting User:Abecedare and User:Mdaniels5757 Without knowledge of Wikipedia Copyright policy i added images without knowing Copyright and also added screenshot(as my own) in absence of authorHet666 (talk) 02:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page has four sections where people provided information/warnings about copyright:

Wikipedia and copyright

September 2022

Speedy deletion nomination of 2023 National Games of India

Adhering to copuright policy

In addition, an earlier version (21 October 2022) warned about copyright at "Problems with upload of File:Gonda lasoda fruit.jpeg". Johnuniq (talk) 04:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) with Johnuniq, sorry if there's some overlap, but I think it may be useful to have both our commentary. Het666, how could you be unaware of Wikipedia's copyright policies after the warnings and the information you have repeatedly received about them? See here, near the top of this page, here, and here. On Commons, where they are deleting your copyrighted images as we speak, you said yesterday you thought specifically images were free.[1] But how could you think that? The copyvio warnings you have received in the last few months on this page are indeed most of them directly about text, but they usually mention images as well. Here's one from August: "We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images"... "To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse". And one from October: "For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites". Another from October: "For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted...... Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing" (bold in the original.) Also, in May you received this warning, specifically concerning the copyright status of an image (now deleted as a copyright violation), where you were urged to read the Image use policy as well as Wikipedia:File copyright tags. (You have removed this warning, but that does not mean it ceases to exist.) People have gone out of their way to warn you and advise you about copyright on Wikipedia, seriously, repeatedly, and in detail, and you're expected to read these things. There comes a point where "I didn't know" fails to convince. Bishonen | tålk 04:21, 5 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Het666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Earlier when first pic got deleted and warning given , i wasn't extended user and thereafter I became Extended user and I uploaded other images too thereafter and it's was successfully uploaded without any warning so I thought that I was now Extended user and can do it's my mistake that I haven't read Policy of Wikipedia #About Draft:2023 National Games of India I don't think that violates any copyright simply it's just 4-5 lines which is generally used for creating sporting event #For September 2022 it's was Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and User: Venkat TL has falsely accused for edit warring and this was one of his tool for that he was blocked thereafter #Adhering to Copyright policy it's was same with Dancherek warning #for first point mentioned is about MoHUA in that i have added information about ministry which is closely related and i have just referenced gov. s website and that page has also used [mohua.gov.in] website too and i thought ok #hey please unblock me I also edit in Gujarati Wikipedia and want to contribute more and again assuring that any copyright violation will not come from me #for 2023 national Games of India it was just 6-7 line article and that is just describing the future event what extent I can change else and same with MoHUA where I mentioned that earlier name of that ministry was ---- and so what can I change in that too #I m also editor on Gujarati Wikipedia and want expand it further

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. What you do or want to do in Gujarati Wikipedia has no bearing here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was not able not able give reference for above it is clearly saying. Again I'm saying that this will never happen again I m sure that I will adhere Wikipedia Copyright policy , as an immature User Forgive me and I am assuring all User:Bishonen User:Abecedare User:Mdaniels5757 User:Johnuniq any issue regarding this will never happen again Hope my pleads will be heard
See my page Het666 how i started my journey on Wikipedia Het666 (talk) 04:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Het666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Bishonen # three point out of four mentioned by Johnuniq doesn't not have much impact i m assuring you that there will be no silly or anything which may affect Wikipedia # in those three point , the information i have added were general in sense
also those were just four-five lines and obviously not copied at all #i accept the rest #dont block me indefinitely and atleast give me some time to understand all Wikipedia policies so I can do my best and want to grow more
(•^•) (°∆°) !!! Het666 (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry but the comments on this page show that the copy violations were probably due to a low level of English and are therefore likely to continue. It is not reasonable to hope that other editors will perpetually monitor everything. Johnuniq (talk) 23:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have decided not to make further 'unblock' request, but i will continue my Wikipedia journey on other Languages and I am always a reader of Wikipedia
Thanks a lot Het666 (talk) 15:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2023 National Games of India

Hello, Het666. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 National Games of India, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2023 National Games of India

Hello, Het666. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 National Games of India".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]