User talk:JTdisabilityartsonline

Welcome!

Hello, JTdisabilityartsonline, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RexxS (talk) 00:45, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Great job with Sue Austin and thank you for your contributions. Garchy (talk) 16:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sue Austin

First of all, thank you very much for the work on Sue Austin. I am an editor who is involved in both WikiProject Devon and Did you know? here at Wikipedia. This article is a fantastic opportunity to showcase very interesting facts and to increase our variation on biographical articles. I think the best way to move forward would be to showcase a photograph on Wikipedia's Main Page in the near future. I am a little concerned by File:Portal wikipedia.jpg, as we typically don't allow editors to upload photographs that aren't their own by relying on an email they received themselves. There is a procedure at Commons:Commons:OTRS, which is designed specifically for this kind of situation. If you feel like following this process to get the proper licensing for the image, that would be great. If not, I would like to help out. Do you know who the author is so that I can contact them myself via OTRS. Regards, Jolly Ω Janner 04:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please forward the emails to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . A volunteer (not me personally) will review the emails to ensure that the license holder is freely releasing the media. We do not accept emails that simply state "I allow Wikipedia to reuse my photos". The easiest way is to ask the photograph's copyright owner to send an email copied from Commons:Commons:Email templates. If you don't chose to use the template, make sure the copyright owner knows that you are requesting it be released under Creative Commons 4.0 (maybe send them this URL?). Finally include a link to https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Portal_wikipedia.jpg in the e-mail to make sure the volunteer can find the picture on our system! Thanks. Any questions, let me know. Jolly Ω Janner 10:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sue Austin has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, JTdisabilityartsonline. Sue Austin, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 19:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sue Austin

On 21 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sue Austin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sue Austin, who performed as part of the London 2012 Cultural Olympiad, uses an underwater wheelchair specially modified with scuba diving equipment (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sue Austin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaite Oreilly has been accepted

Kaite Oreilly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jess Thom has been accepted

Jess Thom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your fine work creating Jess Thom and other articles Theroadislong (talk) 21:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamie Beddard has been accepted

Jamie Beddard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Lobel (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Lobel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eddie891 (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! JTdisabilityartsonline, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eddie891 (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unlimited (arts initiative) has been accepted

Unlimited (arts initiative), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 14:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Brian Lobel

Hello, JTdisabilityartsonline. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brian Lobel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 15:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosie Kay (choreographer) has been accepted

Rosie Kay (choreographer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 21:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Rosie Kay

Hi, I'm Rosguill. JTdisabilityartsonline, thanks for creating Rosie Kay!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article's citation style needs to be improved: right now, a lot of claims don't have clear citations attached to them, and other claims have citations attached that have nothing to do with the claim made. Additionally, clumping four or five citations together at the end of a sentence can be really confusing and hard to follow. The content for the most part seems accurate and good to include, but you need to show your work with the references.

Additionally, the article gives disproportionate weight to a few of her performances, to the near exclusion of the others. 5 Soldiers seems to deserve the attention based on its accolades, but it's not clear why MK ULTRA gets so much more attention than There is Hope. Either flesh the history of the other pieces out a bit, or justify why the pieces that are included deserve so much more attention.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Rosguill^talk 04:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosie Kay Dance Company has been accepted

Rosie Kay Dance Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Yaxu (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]