User talk:Jacemonty

September 2022

Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Granite have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 09:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jacobitism. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jacobitism was changed by Jacemonty (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887666 on 2022-09-19T10:09:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:09, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nuremberg trials. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 12:50, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Petersfield, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 12:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

About your edits ...

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I've looked at a number of your recent edits, beginning with the changes you made to Casanova, since reverted by another editor. Many of your changes to grammar and punctuation are valid and helpful, but equally, many are not. Please slow down and read carefully to understand the effects of your edits on the meaning of the text. It's rarely a good idea to "correct" quoted material without checking the original quoted source. Also, changes such as the ones you made to Wannsee Conference, Nuremberg trials, and Granite are really unhelpful.

I hope you have a fruitful and productive time here. Best wishes,

Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 11:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)