User talk:Jimbonator

Mediation

Informal mediation has begun for the Zodiac killer entry. Your version of events would be greatly appreciated. Please go to Zodiac killer Mediation section as soon as possible. Thanks. Labyrinth13 20:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal message

In the section provided for you, please add your comments on the dispute involving link placement in Zodic killer entry in the section titled, "Statements by editors previously involved in dispute" at: Talk:Zodiac killer#Request_for_Comment:_Link_placement_in_Zodic_killer_entry. Thanks. Labyrinth13 20:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

I have volunteered to mediate in Talk:Zodiac killer#Mediation. Yuser31415 20:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That Cryptogram addition of Heath's

I saw you deleted it, as have I. It seems like original research, and doesn't look like a reliable source to me. If you agree, which I think you do, perhaps you will want to post to that effect on the talk page. I just did a moment ago. Thanks. Jeffpw 20:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help?

Jimbo: If you are so inclined, could you please visit this discussion and offer your opinion? Thanks. Labyrinth13 03:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be interested in joining the Wikipedia Crime Project?

I have seen that you like to contribute to serial killer articles I am trying to organize a task force on this subject under Wikipedia:WikiProject Criminal Biography. If you would be interested in joining contact me. Thanks, Jmm6f488 20:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I added your name, every little bit helps, Jmm6f488 04:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serial killer task force userbox

Here is the userbox for the taskforce:

add this {{User Serial Killer Task Force}}

for this

This user is a participant in the Serial Killer task force.

Thanks, Jmm6f488 02:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misspellings

How on earth can people possibly miss your explicit warnings on the Zodiac decipher????? You place it both above and below the text, for God's sake! It's things like that that make me question the mental development and competence of those drawn to this project. <sigh> Jeffpw 04:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Physician

I'm having a little trouble pointing out on this page that physicians are the most likely profession to be a serial killer (5 sources cited in favour of this point. including the British Medical Journal) - the medics there don't want to accept this bit of info. Could you take a look and comment if you feel so inclined? Thanks:) Malick78 08:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Christie (murderer)

Hello there. I've requested a peer review for the article on John Christie (murderer) and I'm looking for feedback from people interested in serial killers. John Christie was a British serial killer from the 1940s and 50s who murdered a number of women but was also controversially involved in another murder trial, where he gave what's now considered perjured evidence against a fellow tenant. The case generated a lot of controversy in the UK. I'm hoping to turn the article into a featured article, so I'm looking for any comments about potential problems or if there's anything that needs improving. The peer review is available here. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers,

Wcp07 (talk) 09:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The simple art of murder pocket books.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The simple art of murder pocket books.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disappearance of Maura Murray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haverhill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disappearance of Maura Murray

Thanks for the update of Disappearance of Maura Murray, and rescuing some of the broken links. I noticed James Renner's blog, mauramurray.blogspot.com, was removed from the external links, though by an IP and not your account. As Renner is a notable reporter his blog will probably be of interested to many readers and isn't 'spam' as the edit summary claimed, but I'm not insistent on adding it back - what do you think? Fences&Windows 21:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jimbonator. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jimbonator. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jimbonator. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]