User talk:Jonloliverru

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brent David Ruben (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brent David Ruben and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Jonloliverru, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brent David Ruben (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brent David Ruben and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:07, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Brent David Ruben has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Brent David Ruben. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 00:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brent David Ruben (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brent David Ruben and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brent David Ruben (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brent David Ruben and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brent David Ruben has been accepted

Brent David Ruben, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

scope_creep (talk) 14:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Brent David Ruben

Hi @Jonloliverru, I published your article. It was sitting in WP:AFC for too long. The article is not bad. I have cleaned it up a wee bit, fixed the bottom chunk, and put some links and categories. It is mostly completed. Can you add in some categories, and additional references in those areas which don't, e.g. the middle of the article, there is nothing there at all. Coupla chunks of text with no refs. I have also added an auth tag, which will link the article to worlcat. Thanks. Please don't take out the red links. There are needed, so folk can see what needs created. Thanks. scope_creep (talk) 15:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Center for Organizational Development and Leadership

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Center for Organizational Development and Leadership requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 22:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rutgers Leadership Academy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Rutgers Leadership Academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rutgers PreDoctoral Leadership Development Institute

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Rutgers PreDoctoral Leadership Development Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 22:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

OK, thanks very much for all your help. I will make these edits shortly.

Brent David Ruben

Hi Jonloliverru,I see you have substantially expanded the article, and it is now looking pretty decent, but there is a bunch of stuff which I took out, as it was either non notable, or not suitable for biography article. I dont want to copyedit a second time. Information about the grandkids, is not notable. The wife can be mentioned by name, but the qualifications for grandkids and kids, is not notable. Please remove them. The sentence, Ruben enjoys... reads like cv entry. Please take it out. Please take out the ODL section. That is entirely non notable and is nothing to do with the individual in this context, and violates WP:NOTADVERTISING as you are advertising it, by its mere presence. Please take it out. scope_creep (talk) 17:07, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

I see you have tried to create empty articles for the link I created, which have been deleted as they have no content, re: Rutgers PreDoctoral Leadership Development Institute. Can you relink them so future editors known an article is needed for them. Perhaps you can create these articles. Thanks. scope_creep (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Jonloliverru (talk) 19:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Jonloliverru: Thanks very much for all your help. I will make these edits shortly.

Conflict of Interest

Hi Jonloliverru, I see you took that image yourself on the Brent David Ruben page. I would you had a WP:COI conflict of interest. scope_creep (talk) 08:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, thanks very much. I think I did this incorrectly anyway. The photographer turned over ownership to me of this photo. Should I do something differently? Thanks!

September 2021

Your edit to Carol Kuhlthau has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2022

Hello Jonloliverru. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Brent David Ruben, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jonloliverru. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jonloliverru|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DanCherek (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Derek,

Thanks for reaching out. I have nor will I receive any compensation, nor have any financial interest in Brent's Wikipedia page. He is a colleague of mine and asked for my help updating his page.

Best,

Jon Oliver 173.70.127.16 (talk) 20:22, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

The conflict of interest guideline still applies. Please read that carefully. At present, the article is kind of a mess of unsourced and uncited content. COI editors are strongly advised to propose changes to article talk pages rather than directly edit affected articles. DanCherek (talk) 20:38, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Meant to write, I have not, nor will I receive any compensation. Thanks again. Jonloliverru (talk) 16:04, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)