User talk:Justin Dwyer

NFC[edit]

Hi. I know all this is a lot to take in, and I'm sorry, but please read WP:NFC. File:Riskalyze.png and File:Riskalyze2.png can't be kept here unless your draft article becomes an article in mainspace within 7 days.

You also can't use a non-free file in your draft, so I'm going to have to comment that usage out of the sandbox draft. See Wikipedia:Drafts#Preparing drafts, which explains - "Non-free content cannot be included in draft articles per Wikipedia's policy on where non-free media is allowed. Any desired non-free content should be added to the article once it has been moved to the mainspace."

If the files do get deleted and the article is subsequently moved to mainspace you could, at that time, request reinstatement of one of the files at WP:REFUND.

I also note from your user page that you are employed by this company, so you should additionally read WP:Conflict of interest which gives advice on editing in that situation. -- Begoon 14:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Begoon. I intend to publish the article to the mainspace today. I updated my user page for COI. I believe I've remained neutral in the article, but unbiased eyes are welcome, so please point out if anything goes against WP expectations. Justin Dwyer (talk) 18:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing that. I moved {{Connected contributor}} to the draft article talk page because that's where they usually go, and altered your user page usage to a userbox. Cheers. -- Begoon 10:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Riskalyze (December 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jack Frost was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Riskalyze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jack Frost (talk) 22:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Justin Dwyer, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jack Frost (talk) 22:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Riskalyze[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Riskalyze, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TJH2018 talk 18:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TJH2018, thanks for reviewing this draft, and sorry the content wasn't appropriate here. I don't plan to resubmit it any time soon, but I potentially will in the future if it seems like enough new sources to establish notability have emerged (with help from unbiased eyes to eliminate self-promotion). With that in mind, could I retrieve the content of the deleted article draft? --Justin Dwyer (talk) 18:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User page template[edit]

Hello Justin. I see that you have properly declared on the talk page of your draft article that you are employed by Riskalyze, so thanks for that. However, on your user page, I see you have used the {{UserboxCOI}} template. In this case you should actually use the {{paid}} template because you are receiving compensation. In the case of a conflict of interest without a paid relationship, then UserboxCOI would be appropriate. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Drm310, I've updated it to be correct, I think. Let me know if it's not quite right. --Justin Dwyer (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. You can remove the {{UserboxCOI}}, since it's redundant. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:12, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Riskalyze has been accepted[edit]

Riskalyze, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 02:54, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]