User talk:Lemabeta

Sockpuppet Investigation

Greetings, I have opened a sockpuppet investigation Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Əzərbəyəniləri for a user named User talk:Frankish Human with which you have been engaged in an edit dispute on the Matzoon page [1]. I believe the user's behavior is suspicious and should be examined.

If you also have concerns about the user's behavior feel free to make a comment under the investigation in the provided space (or not, up to you)

Cheers,

- Creffel (talk) 15:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the user was indeed a sockpuppet, thanks for your input.

- Creffel (talk) 00:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Lemabeta! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! > Tesseractic: talk? ✎ 20:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jruchi I Gospel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jruchi I Gospel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SuperMightyBoy (talk) 15:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jruchi I Gospel

I moved the Jruchi I Gospel to Draft space because the page is not ready for article. Your recent article creation submission to my recently draft moved page Draft:Jruchi I Gospel, may be reviewed under 4 months or more time. Please wait, and thank you for submitting. SuperMightyBoy (talk) 15:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what was the reason of it? what needs to be improved? Lemabeta (talk) 16:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission has declined by New Page Reviewer- Safari Scribe, please add more references i think 90, you only added 5 ref. and re submit the Afc submission. SuperMightyBoy (talk) 17:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jruchi I Gospel (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jruchi I Gospel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lemabeta! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Lemabeta. Thank you for your work on Alaverdi Gospels. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article. I enjoyed learning about this old Georgian manuscript.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 08:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words <3 Lemabeta (talk) 09:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chechil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

POV pushing

There is so much POV in your edits, and some are just blatant POV push with disregard of sources, WP:OR changes of sourced content, or picking and choosing what to use or not use despite it being sourced by the same source. I've already made my points clear in the talk page and edit summaries, but I can reiterate here if need be specifically which edits I'm talking about. If you keep engaging in this form of WP:TENDENTIOUS and WP:OR pov pushing, you'll be reported to the arbitration comitee. And keep in mind, the rules involving Armenia (and Azerbaijan too) articles are much more strict than most other topics (see contentious topics link above), you'll likely get blocked or topic-banned if reported so please be mindful of the policies I listed and the way you're editing - it can't continue like this, you need to know you shouldn't be doing what you're doing right now in several articles. Vanezi (talk) 10:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are pushing your own POV. Removing everything Georgian even sourced. And none of my edits were involving Armenian Azerbaijan conflict. Lemabeta (talk) 08:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like instead of editing in adherence to Wikipedia policies, you continued the problematic editing and also made baseless accusations of me POV pushing. See you in WP:AE. Vanezi (talk) 10:21, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think you really comprehend what policies are and that you can’t keep saying things based on just your opinions, you actually need to talk with policies in mind, which I showed you several times on talk and you keep ignoring them like when you're using subpar sources that don’t pass WP:RS or WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:UNDUE POV pushing, etc. You also keep edit-warring on those same baseless opinions and ignoring comments with policy grounds on talk. I guess it’s far past the time talking to you patiently and it’s time to allow the admins to judge your behavior in AE and what you do on a daily basis here. Until then, don’t tell me you’ll open a DRN or anything of that sort [2], I won’t participate in a DRN with somebody who’s in the process of being reported and possibly blocked/topic-banned from Armenia-Georgia articles, this just doesn’t make sense. I will wait and see the verdict of AE before participating in any DRNs with you, so at the current time, don’t post anything in dispute resolution that involves me. Vanezi (talk) 05:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. Thank you. Vanezi (talk) 10:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

The following topic ban now applies to you:

indefinitely topic-banned from the history of the Caucasus and its cultural heritage, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:40, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jruchi I Gospel has been accepted

Jruchi I Gospel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 12:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]