User talk:MW691
MW691, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi MW691! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 4 July 2020 (UTC) |
Welcome
[edit]
|
Disambiguation link notification for October 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kerry Burke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geoffrey Palmer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Edit summaries
[edit]I just want to commend you on your edit summaries. Top marks. That is exemplary work. Schwede66 03:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! I worry that they're too wordy and rambling sometimes (good thing there's a character limit), but I think it's helpful to set out my thinking so that others can easily understand my intentions.MW691 (talk) 05:13, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- You say: "Hope it's all right for me to re-rate this myself. It's clearly no longer a stub, and list seems to be the obvious classification." Yes, it's absolutely fine for you to re-rate an article that you have improved. Unless you get very experienced in rating, anything below B-class is fine for you to rate yourself. Once you've done a lot of rating, you can even do your own B-class. Anything above B-class must always be rated by other editors. Schwede66 00:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, much appreciated. MW691 (talk) 03:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- You say: "Hope it's all right for me to re-rate this myself. It's clearly no longer a stub, and list seems to be the obvious classification." Yes, it's absolutely fine for you to re-rate an article that you have improved. Unless you get very experienced in rating, anything below B-class is fine for you to rate yourself. Once you've done a lot of rating, you can even do your own B-class. Anything above B-class must always be rated by other editors. Schwede66 00:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Barbara Edmonds
[edit]You say in your edit summary: "A different Barbara Edmonds now qualifies for an article, as she has just been elected to the New Zealand Parliament. Have copied onto the page the draft prepared by the WikiProject New Zealand politics taskforce, as it can't be moved directly to an existing page name" Unfortunately, that's not the correct way to go about it as this constitutes a cut-and-paste move. And with that, the history of the draft goes missing. That is a problem because, for legal reasons, a page history must be maintained. The correct thing to do is to ask for help; there are users who can move over existing pages. I'll fix it now via a history merge. Schwede66 21:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I was worried that I was doing the wrong thing there. I had a brief look at the pages on moves and couldn't see anything about this sort of case or where to ask for help, and I was in a rush to get the content in the right place as the page was already being linked to. I should have taken more time and care, and I apologise. MW691 (talk) 07:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, "moving a page" is a rather long set of instructions. Your case is covered under WP:MOR. Those things tend to happen quickly; there is no backlog with technical move requests. You can also see whether you spot an admin who is currently active and shoulder-tap them. Schwede66 23:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deputy Prime Minister of New Zealand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kelvin Davis.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thanks for Feedback
[edit]Kia ora and thank you so much for all of your helpful feedback! I'll definitely take it on board if (and when) I do my next one :-) It's nice to have helpful/non-passive aggressive feedback, as it seems very common in some parts of wikipedia! Nauseous Man (talk) 07:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! It's very kind of you to say so. And thank you for doing the hard work of actually putting a table together. I've always been too worried about getting the numbers wrong to give it a try, much as I'd like to see the electorate articles all be up to date. It's much easier to follow along and check up on other people's contributions!
- It is sadly common to see negatively phrased feedback. I haven't had much personally, but I've been an intermittent observer of Wikipedia politics for many years, and seeing how unpleasant it can get is probably partly why I only stopped lurking last year. On the other hand, positive interactions like this one are very encouraging! MW691 (talk) 10:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- In terms of getting the numbers right, I made a spreadsheet of the 2017 election and 2020 numbers and did the math through formula. I wonder if it would be useful for me to upload the template with the formulae built into it somewhere, so that others can just plug in the raw data and everything comes out good. Have a good day! Nauseous Man (talk) 20:28, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- That sounds a very good way of doing things! If you did want to upload that - maybe on the Politics taskforce page? - I'm sure it would very helpful to users. I've just added the Rangitata numbers, and as my spreadsheet skills are minimal, I did the individual calculations, which was a very slow process. If you have time at some point, you would be most welcome to check them - but only if you want to! MW691 (talk) 09:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- In terms of getting the numbers right, I made a spreadsheet of the 2017 election and 2020 numbers and did the math through formula. I wonder if it would be useful for me to upload the template with the formulae built into it somewhere, so that others can just plug in the raw data and everything comes out good. Have a good day! Nauseous Man (talk) 20:28, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Stylistic changes
[edit]I changed the layout of the infobox value on 52nd New Zealand Parliament because having it in reverse chronological order is a bit confusing especially when there are three other people that don't get clear term dates in the infobox. I'm not going to change all previous years because those ones mostly only have two people in the cell, max, and the current format works for that. In cases where there are a lot of people in that role, my layout is easier to work out. Nixinova T C 20:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting in touch. I can certainly see the merits of the style you've used here, and I'm in no way attached to the previous practice - doing it in reverse reads rather oddly, and if I were the one creating all these articles initially, I don't think I would have adopted it. It's just the consistency between articles that bothers me. There are actually quite a few Parliaments where cells have three or more people in them. Just starting from the beginning, the 3rd and 5th Parliaments each have six different ministries. Even with some of those being led from the Legislative Council (and hence having a separate cell) they have five and four ministries in the one cell, respectively. The 15th Parliament has six Speakers of the Council listed. There are numerous Parliaments in the 19th and early 20th centuries with one or more cells containing three people. Things have admittedly calmed down since the start of the two-party system (while acknowledging the recent National situation that started this conversation) but as recently as the 80s you have first National and then Labour having three leaders in one term.
- I realise there's no ideal way of doing this, especially in the early days with the constant changes of government and the leaders of those governments serving in both chambers, but I would like to see consistent practice across articles, whatever it may be. If we can reach a consensus I'm happy to go through and make changes myself. MW691 (talk) 03:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dail Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Donnelly.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Mike Butterick
[edit]
On 11 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mike Butterick, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a third of the MPs elected in the 2023 New Zealand election were new to Parliament, including Carlos Cheung, Grant McCallum, Suze Redmayne, Dana Kirkpatrick, Ryan Hamilton, James Meager, Greg Fleming, Vanessa Weenink, Mike Butterick, Katie Nimon, David MacLeod, Miles Anderson, Carl Bates, Rima Nakhle, Nancy Lu, Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, Reuben Davidson, Scott Willis, Darleen Tana, Takutai Moana Kemp (all pictured), Kahurangi Carter, Todd Stephenson, Laura Trask, Cameron Luxton, Tākuta Ferris, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, Casey Costello, Jamie Arbuckle, and Tanya Unkovich? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vanessa Weenink. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mike Butterick), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 00:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Rima Nakhle
[edit]On 11 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rima Nakhle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a third of the MPs elected in the 2023 New Zealand election were new to Parliament, including Carlos Cheung, Grant McCallum, Suze Redmayne, Dana Kirkpatrick, Ryan Hamilton, James Meager, Greg Fleming, Vanessa Weenink, Mike Butterick, Katie Nimon, David MacLeod, Miles Anderson, Carl Bates, Rima Nakhle, Nancy Lu, Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, Reuben Davidson, Scott Willis, Darleen Tana, Takutai Moana Kemp (all pictured), Kahurangi Carter, Todd Stephenson, Laura Trask, Cameron Luxton, Tākuta Ferris, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, Casey Costello, Jamie Arbuckle, and Tanya Unkovich? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vanessa Weenink. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rima Nakhle), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.