User talk:Madeline1805

Correction of percent to percent

Hello, I was wondering why you changed the word «percent» to the same exact spelling which changed absolutely nothing. I may have misread your comment on history but please do not add summaries that make absolutely no sense for these could be misleading and make other editors such as I search for a mistake made without finding anything making us miss other possible mistakes such as typos, incorrect links are faulty code. -Þýskalandí Þýskalandi (talk) 19:49, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They were originally the British English spelling of it, and according to MOS:PERCENT, is spelled "per cent". I have seen my error, and will stride to not repeat said actions.

Aknip (talk) 12:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, for your concern. I hope to find more kind and tespectful wikipedia editors such as you. I'm deeply sorry if i may have been harsh. Please spend a good day.-Þýskalandí (Germany in icelandic) Þýskalandi (talk) 17:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All is good.

Aknip (talk) 19:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Respectful*

Þýskalandi (talk) 17:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

English variation

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 20:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for notifying me of that. I apologize for making that mistake.

I was not aware that British English spelled "percent" different than American English did.

I will make sure to not make that mistake again.

Aknip (talk) 11:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technically the Americans spell it differently to the British :) Canterbury Tail talk 16:47, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Potato, potato.

Aknip (talk) 17:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XO (Eden song) (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XO (Eden song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 16:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aknip! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 16:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TiLP (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TiLP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:XO (Eden song)

Hello, Aknip. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:XO (Eden song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:XO (Eden song)

Hello, Aknip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "XO".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TiLP

Hello, Aknip. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TiLP, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:TiLP

Hello, Aknip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TiLP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Congratulations on your 100th edit!110.145.11.12 (talk) 14:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aknip (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6年目始動記念ミニアルバム「6年目スタート！」 (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:6年目始動記念ミニアルバム「6年目スタート！」 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 14:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:6nenmestart.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:6nenmestart.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:6nenmestart.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:6nenmestart.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. – dudhhr^talk_contribs^she_her 16:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:6nenmestart.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:6nenmestart.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:16, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know this. Thank you.

Aknip (talk) 17:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:6年目始動記念ミニアルバム「6年目スタート！」

Hello, Aknip. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:6年目始動記念ミニアルバム「6年目スタート！」, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:6年目始動記念ミニアルバム「6年目スタート！」

Hello, Aknip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "6年目始動記念ミニアルバム「6年目スタート！」".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]